Comments on: More on Bill 34 http://www.prowomanprolife.org/2009/08/21/more-on-bill-34/ Thu, 18 Mar 2010 02:01:43 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: ProWomanProLife » It’s not about price point http://www.prowomanprolife.org/2009/08/21/more-on-bill-34/comment-page-1/#comment-4018 ProWomanProLife » It’s not about price point Thu, 27 Aug 2009 19:56:19 +0000 http://www.prowomanprolife.org/?p=6689#comment-4018 [...] At least in China abortion providers are honest about the fact that they’re running a business. North American abortion clinics, by contrast, dress themselves up in the robes of feminism, women’s health, and compassion, and sell quick fixes that wreak a lifetime of damage.  If abortion providers marketed themselves as offering a service, rather than women’s saviours, perhaps they would not be so resistant to complying with basic safety regulations. [...] [...] At least in China abortion providers are honest about the fact that they’re running a business. North American abortion clinics, by contrast, dress themselves up in the robes of feminism, women’s health, and compassion, and sell quick fixes that wreak a lifetime of damage.  If abortion providers marketed themselves as offering a service, rather than women’s saviours, perhaps they would not be so resistant to complying with basic safety regulations. [...]

]]> By: Karol http://www.prowomanprolife.org/2009/08/21/more-on-bill-34/comment-page-1/#comment-3992 Karol Tue, 25 Aug 2009 04:42:02 +0000 http://www.prowomanprolife.org/?p=6689#comment-3992 Andrea, Please send me an email at: karol_karolak@yahoo.ca You might wish to have good look at what I got from Germany, re; Dr. Henry Morgertaler. Andrea,

Please send me an email at:

karol_karolak@yahoo.ca
You might wish to have good look at what I got from Germany, re; Dr. Henry Morgertaler.

]]> By: Karol http://www.prowomanprolife.org/2009/08/21/more-on-bill-34/comment-page-1/#comment-3991 Karol Tue, 25 Aug 2009 03:32:11 +0000 http://www.prowomanprolife.org/?p=6689#comment-3991 I have recently received by snail mail certified copies of some very interesting documents dug up in German Archives. These documents list Dr. Morgentaler’s movements in post WWII Europe and they bear Dr. Morgentaler’s signatures on them. What is Dr. Morgentaler going to do now? Is he going to falsify his Medical Diploma from University of Montreal and change year of his graduation from 1953 to 1956? Just asking. In case links exposing Morgentaler stop working Here are back up links to back up copies http://tinyurl.com/hm-cpso-screen1 http://tinyurl.com/rosenfarb-chava I have recently received by snail mail certified copies of some very interesting documents dug up in German Archives. These documents list Dr. Morgentaler’s movements in post WWII Europe and they bear Dr. Morgentaler’s signatures on them. What is Dr. Morgentaler going to do now? Is he going to falsify his Medical Diploma from University of Montreal and change year of his graduation from 1953 to 1956?
Just asking.

In case links exposing Morgentaler stop working
Here are back up links to back up copies
http://tinyurl.com/hm-cpso-screen1
http://tinyurl.com/rosenfarb-chava

]]> By: Karol http://www.prowomanprolife.org/2009/08/21/more-on-bill-34/comment-page-1/#comment-3990 Karol Tue, 25 Aug 2009 03:23:14 +0000 http://www.prowomanprolife.org/?p=6689#comment-3990 Please read biography of Chava Rosenfarb (Dr. Henry Morgentaler’s first wife) written by Goldie Morgentaler, Dr. Henry Morgentaler’s daughter and published by "Jewish Women: A Comprehensive Historical Encyclopedia" at: http://jwa.org/encyclopedia/article/rosenfarb-chava According to Dr. Henry Morgentaler own daughter Goldie, Morgentaler’s family arrived in Canada in 1950, and Dr. Morgentaler “EARNED” his medical degree in 1956, and that would make perrfect sense as it takes 6 years of medical studies in order to get such degree. Why is it than that Dr. Henry Morgentaler claims in all of his submissions to all organisations regulating medcal professions that he graduated from medical school (University of Montreal) in 1953? See: http://www.cpso.on.ca/docsearch/details.aspx?view=1&id= 29962 Please read biography of Chava Rosenfarb (Dr. Henry Morgentaler’s first wife) written by Goldie Morgentaler, Dr. Henry Morgentaler’s daughter and published by “Jewish Women: A Comprehensive Historical Encyclopedia” at:
http://jwa.org/encyclopedia/article/rosenfarb-chava
According to Dr. Henry Morgentaler own daughter Goldie, Morgentaler’s family arrived in Canada in 1950, and Dr. Morgentaler “EARNED” his medical degree in 1956, and that would make perrfect sense as it takes 6 years of medical studies in order to get such degree.
Why is it than that Dr. Henry Morgentaler claims in all of his submissions to all organisations regulating medcal professions that he graduated from medical school (University of Montreal) in 1953?
See: http://www.cpso.on.ca/docsearch/details.aspx?view=1&id= 29962

]]> By: Karol http://www.prowomanprolife.org/2009/08/21/more-on-bill-34/comment-page-1/#comment-3989 Karol Tue, 25 Aug 2009 03:18:54 +0000 http://www.prowomanprolife.org/?p=6689#comment-3989 Andrea, "The abortion distortion." in Canada is even more profound than you reported in your recent article posted in National Post. This “abortion distortion” extends to wilful neglect by medical colleges all across Canada to check academic credentials of people who are performing abortions in this country. Perfect example of such wilful neglect is the case of Dr. Henry Morgentaler, who seem to have some very serious difficulties to account for three years of his medical education that he allegedly completed in Europe. Please read Morgentaler's updated bio at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_Morgentaler Andrea,

“The abortion distortion.” in Canada is even more profound than you reported in your recent article posted in National Post.

This “abortion distortion” extends to wilful neglect by medical colleges all across Canada to check academic credentials of people who are performing abortions in this country.
Perfect example of such wilful neglect is the case of Dr. Henry Morgentaler, who seem to have some very serious difficulties to account for three years of his medical education that he allegedly completed in Europe.
Please read Morgentaler’s updated bio at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_Morgentaler

]]> By: James http://www.prowomanprolife.org/2009/08/21/more-on-bill-34/comment-page-1/#comment-3986 James Mon, 24 Aug 2009 20:03:56 +0000 http://www.prowomanprolife.org/?p=6689#comment-3986 Time for some gender testing for you all.. just like the South African runner, Caster Semenya. I expect to hear the results back from you in about 6 weeks. ;-) Time for some gender testing for you all.. just like the South African runner, Caster Semenya.

I expect to hear the results back from you in about 6 weeks.

;-)

]]> By: Rachel http://www.prowomanprolife.org/2009/08/21/more-on-bill-34/comment-page-1/#comment-3969 Rachel Sat, 22 Aug 2009 03:36:32 +0000 http://www.prowomanprolife.org/?p=6689#comment-3969 Totally inspiring. A great, great argument, clearly and well presented. Bravo for your fearless witness! Totally inspiring. A great, great argument, clearly and well presented. Bravo for your fearless witness!

]]> By: C.L. Dyck http://www.prowomanprolife.org/2009/08/21/more-on-bill-34/comment-page-1/#comment-3968 C.L. Dyck Fri, 21 Aug 2009 17:57:51 +0000 http://www.prowomanprolife.org/?p=6689#comment-3968 I was pleased to see the Post give you a voice. Equal representation for all sides should be available. "The distortion happens when a perfectly valid study showing poor mental health effects for women after abortion is ignored, or worse still, torn apart as was done with the credible work of New Zealand psychologist David Fergusson. It happens when physical side effects post-abortion are kept under wraps, such as the credible link to subsequent pre-term deliveries after an abortion." I have to say, I get tired of hearing aborted women invalidated when they find out the hard way that it wasn't as simple as they were led to believe. I was pleased to see the Post give you a voice. Equal representation for all sides should be available.

“The distortion happens when a perfectly valid study showing poor mental health effects for women after abortion is ignored, or worse still, torn apart as was done with the credible work of New Zealand psychologist David Fergusson. It happens when physical side effects post-abortion are kept under wraps, such as the credible link to subsequent pre-term deliveries after an abortion.”

I have to say, I get tired of hearing aborted women invalidated when they find out the hard way that it wasn’t as simple as they were led to believe.

]]> By: fern hill http://www.prowomanprolife.org/2009/08/21/more-on-bill-34/comment-page-1/#comment-3966 fern hill Fri, 21 Aug 2009 16:10:44 +0000 http://www.prowomanprolife.org/?p=6689#comment-3966 The government backed down because -- surprise, surprise -- in the most pro-choice province in the country, it is political suicide to mess with women's rights. Simple. The government backed down because — surprise, surprise — in the most pro-choice province in the country, it is political suicide to mess with women’s rights. Simple.

]]> By: Alana LaPerle http://www.prowomanprolife.org/2009/08/21/more-on-bill-34/comment-page-1/#comment-3965 Alana LaPerle Fri, 21 Aug 2009 15:13:28 +0000 http://www.prowomanprolife.org/?p=6689#comment-3965 Thanks, as always, ladies for your intelligent and clear argument. You might also have mentioned that the pro-aborts always raise the spectre of the coat hanger and "back alley" abortions whenever the status quo is threatened. Wasn't their (implied) concern that women's health was at risk from the lack of medical standards? How, then, can they argue that abortionists should not be required to meet basic medical standards? They can't have it both ways. Their audacity is breathtaking! Thanks, as always, ladies for your intelligent and clear argument. You might also have mentioned that the pro-aborts always raise the spectre of the coat hanger and “back alley” abortions whenever the status quo is threatened. Wasn’t their (implied) concern that women’s health was at risk from the lack of medical standards? How, then, can they argue that abortionists should not be required to meet basic medical standards? They can’t have it both ways. Their audacity is breathtaking!

]]>