Sep 30 2009

Connecting the dots would be politically incorrect

Published by Andrea Mrozek at 10:49 am

So that’s why I’ll post this item about Canada’s high infant mortality rate…

Prada said Canada’s relatively high infant mortality rate — the rate at which infants die before their first birthday — may be due to a high number of premature births and fertility programs increasing the number of multiple births, along with a variety of socio-economic and environmental factors

…while reminding you of this item, about how abortion is correlated with the subsequent premature delivery of wanted pregnancies.

Related posts:

  1. Infant mortality rates up Right here in Canada, I mean. OTTAWA ­- Infant mortality...
  2. Want to reduce maternal mortality? Here’s something I wasn’t expecting: According to a recent report...
  3. Death rate increasing… in California I find this surprising, to say the least: The mortality...
  4. “One in four pregnancies in Israel ends in abortion” The Central Bureau of Statistics recently released data that showed...
  5. There’s a reason it’s called natural birth And that’s probably because, all else being equal, it’s a...

One response so far

One Response to “Connecting the dots would be politically incorrect”

  1. Suricou Ravenon 01 Oct 2009 at 5:43 am

    http://www.abortionincanada.ca/stats/Annual%20abortion%20rates%20pdfs/Canada%20abortion%20rates,%201988-2005.pdf

    97,000 abortions in 2005. Huh. I was expecting higher. Well, I don’t imagine it’s changed by too much in four years.

    Canada population 33,000,000… probably fair to assume around half of those are women, which is 16,500,000. That comes to an abortion rate of one in 170 women, ignoring the even rarer serial abortions… No, I can’t imagine that having much of an impact. It’s just not enough abortions to be statistically significent on it’s own. At most it’s one of many contributing factors.

Trackback URI

Leave a Comment

Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes