Oct 29 2009

Oh yes, that’s MUCH better than creating children the old-fashioned way

Published by Brigitte Pellerin at 11:44 am

I don’t mean to sound anti-science (no more than usual, I mean), but man oh man, I do find this stuff spooky. And isn’t it amazing to be surrounded by advice on how to have great amazing (yet sterile) sex every day of the month and by stories extolling the virtues of creating eggs and sperm in some lab in part to help understand infertility, all at the same time?

At the risk of sounding overly simplistic (more than usual, I mean), wouldn’t it be easier if we pretty much kept sex for procreative reasons and left it at that?

Oh, I know. We can’t do that. It’s not nearly as sophisticated as turning the inability to control basic hormonal urges into a science.

Related posts:

  1. Getting rid of Down Syndrome children Share A fine post by Paul Tuns. Especially this: The...
  2. Creating mini adults Share The so-called tween years are starting as early as...
  3. Read it and weep (literally) Share Reading this took me right back to my days...
  4. Life sentence for mother convicted of killing her three children Share What a sad, horrible story. A jury in Saguenay,...

3 responses so far

3 Responses to “Oh yes, that’s MUCH better than creating children the old-fashioned way”

  1. Suricou Ravenon 29 Oct 2009 at 2:08 pm

    Easier is debateable. But it’d certinly be a lot less fun! :>

    Besides, humans want to have sex. It’s in their nature. And they will do it, one way or another. Might as well let them do it without risk of intented procreation.

  2. curiouS veRnaon 29 Oct 2009 at 3:19 pm

    @Suricou

    “Easier is debateable [sic]. But it’d certinly [sic] be a lot less fun!”

    Huh??? Brigitte said it would “be easier if we pretty much kept sex (versus complicated science) for procreative reasons”. As a scientist I can corroborate that she is correct. It is far easier to use sex to bring about procreation than trying to produce babies in a test tube.

    And if you think the scientific way is more fun, then might I suggest you are doing it wrong.

  3. Suricou Ravenon 29 Oct 2009 at 4:46 pm

    My spelling really is bad… sorry about that.

    Our interpretations differ. I assumed Brigitte’s mention of keeping sex for procreative reasons was in opposition to the comparatively recent idea of sex for entirely recreative reasons, with procreation inhibited.

Trackback URI

Leave a Comment

Powered by WP Hashcash

Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes