Mar 18 2010

Who are people?

Published by at 7:40 am

If that seems like a dumb question, perhaps take a look at this new web site, launched yesterday.

______________________

Brigitte is back in the 1980s: Now I can’t get this song out of my head. Thanks Andrea!

______________________

And so is Véronique: Gee, thanks Brigitte.

No related posts.

3 responses so far

3 Responses to “Who are people?”

  1. Danon 18 Mar 2010 at 1:31 pm

    Andrea et al.

    Are you going to sign the personhood petition? Why or why not?

  2. Andrea Mrozekon 24 Mar 2010 at 3:13 pm

    Dan,
    Yes, I just signed. Because I believe people are people, in or outside the womb. Sorry about the delay in my response.
    Andrea

  3. Danon 24 Mar 2010 at 6:33 pm

    Andrea,

    Thanks for responding. I agree that logically it makes sense. The law, however, seems to have a logic all of its own, and I’m still grappling with the question of whether legal personhood, in the Canadian context, is the best way to achieve the desired goal of recognizing and defending the natural rights of the unborn, or whether some other way is better.

    I am specifically wondering whether the suggested modification of Section 223 of the Canadian Criminal Code, by itself, would have unintended legal consequences.

    Some things to ponder:
    - should an embryo have the right to inherit property?
    - would the census have to count embryos?
    - if a woman has a miscarriage, will she be protected from undue questioning of her behaviour?

    Perhaps someone with a background in law could comment on this.

    On the other hand, this petition is very far from achieving its objective, so maybe signing it is justified for the purpose of generating some reasoned debate on this issue.

    Dan

Trackback URI

Leave a Comment


− 6 = three

Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes