ProWomanProLife

  • The Story
  • The Women
  • Notable Columns
  • Contact Us
You are here: Home / All Posts / The Pill does not advance women’s rights

The Pill does not advance women’s rights

July 10, 2015 by Andrea Mrozek 7 Comments

Nonetheless, I still say it should be made over the counter:

All this said, yes, please do make the Pill over the counter. Perhaps when it sits beside Tylenol on a drugstore shelf, advocacy groups will stop yammering on about how the Pill is a major component of women’s rights. Or that it is patronizing when doctors show concern. Perhaps then we will stop targeting excellent doctors who won’t prescribe it for very good reasons.

Which gets interpreted by Huff Post commentators as meaning I want to reduce access to all contraception. If you are pro-woman and pro-life, please feel free to leave a reasonable comment, for or against the Pill (so that Huff Post folks can misinterpret and distort what you say, sigh.)

Pills_web

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmailby feather

Filed Under: All Posts, Featured Media, Feminism, Motherhood

Comments

  1. Melissa says

    July 10, 2015 at 8:07 pm

    You’ve changed your tune as to whether or not the Pill should be made available over the counter. What caused you to change your mind?

    Reply
  2. Andrea Mrozek says

    July 10, 2015 at 9:15 pm

    Largely conscience rights for doctors, but I’ll do a bigger response later.

    Reply
    • Melissa says

      July 10, 2015 at 11:17 pm

      I’m looking forward to your response, because I’m torn on this issue. When push comes to shove, the Pill isn’t Tylenol or Aspirin. It seriously changes how a woman’s body functions. And I worry about the fourteen and fifteen yr olds who would have access to this drug without being under a doctor’s supervision.

      I also have mixed feelings about making self-referral available for a procedure or drug, in order to circumvent a doctor having to violate his conscience. That’s one of te reasons we have self-referral for abortions, and I don’t think it is in a patient’s best interest to be able to self-refer for such a life-altering procedure.

      Still thinking this one through…

      Reply

Leave a Reply to Melissa Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow Us

Facebooktwitterrssby feather

Notable Columns

  • A pro-woman budget wouldn't tell me how to live my life
  • Bad medicine
  • Birth control pills have side effects
  • Canada Summer Jobs debacle–Can Trudeau call abortion a right?
  • Celebrate these Jubilee jailbirds
  • China has laws against sex selection. But not Canada. Why?
  • Family love is not a contract
  • Freedom to discuss the “choice”
  • Gender quotas don't help business or women
  • Ghomeshi case a wake-up call
  • Hidden cost of choice
  • Life at the heart of the matter
  • Life issues and the media
  • Need for rational abortion debate
  • New face of the abortion debate
  • People vs. kidneys
  • PET-P press release
  • Pro-life work is making me sick
  • Prolife doesn't mean anti-woman
  • Settle down or "lean in"
  • Sex education is all about values
  • Thank you, Camille Paglia
  • The new face of feminism
  • Today’s law worth discussing
  • When debate is shut down in Canada’s highest places

Categories

  • All Posts
  • Assisted Suicide/Euthanasia
  • Charitable
  • Ethics
  • Featured Media
  • Featured Posts
  • Feminism
  • Free Expression
  • International
  • Motherhood
  • Other
  • Political
  • Pregnancy Care Centres
  • Reproductive Technologies

All Posts

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Copyright © 2022 · News Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in