ProWomanProLife

  • The Story
  • The Women
  • Notable Columns
  • Contact Us
You are here: Home / All Posts / Act now – protect freedom of conscience for health care professionals

Act now – protect freedom of conscience for health care professionals

March 18, 2009 by Brigitte Pellerin 6 Comments

Or at least, try to. Here’s what this is about:

On January 20, 2009, President Bush implemented regulations that would protect health care workers who refuse to participate in abortion-related activities from discrimination. President Obama and his Department of Health and Human Services have published their intent to overturn these regulations. The regulations are intended to educate health care professionals, as well as the general public, about the rights of medical personnel to treat their patients in accordance with their conscience, free from discrimination or intimidation. They also give health care professionals a way to press charges in the event that they experience discrimination. By law the Obama Administration must leave a 30 day period open for the public to comment on his repeal of the right of conscience. Please write into the Department of Health and Human Service today and tell them that you oppose discrimination on account of conscience!

The link above gives you a form you can complete and email, voicing your concerns. Please consider doing so.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmailby feather

Filed Under: All Posts

Comments

  1. Deborah says

    March 18, 2009 at 4:30 pm

    Thanks for posting this!

    Reply
  2. Amalthea says

    March 18, 2009 at 6:18 pm

    “Thank you for telling the Department of Health and Human Services that you support the right of conscience for health care professionals. ”

    Thanks.

    It just astounds me that Obama’s main goal is to make abortion as widely available as possible. His actions from day one in office have made that painfully clear.

    Reply
  3. Julie Culshaw says

    March 18, 2009 at 6:52 pm

    Can Canadians take part in this?

    Reply
  4. Brigitte Pellerin says

    March 18, 2009 at 8:29 pm

    Julie: Yes, absolutely. I did.

    Reply
  5. jr says

    March 23, 2009 at 9:26 pm

    In the U.S, health care professionals already have laws that protect them from having to participate in, or perform abortions. this proposal isn’t about protecting health care providers religious or moral objection to abortion. It’s about allowing them to refuse to prescribe birth control pills or even performing a blood transfusion if it goes against their religious beliefs without even having to at least give a referal.

    Obviously, women will be the most affected by this proposal. I respect other people’s religious beliefs but i will not allow someone’s religious beliefs to affect or put my health in jeopardy. Because of all the reasons above i opposed this proposal and sent Bush an email objecting to it. I’m grateful that Obama is fighting to repeal it.

    Reply
  6. Helen says

    April 6, 2009 at 10:53 am

    Since “freedom of choice” is so important to Obama; I have the solution.
    Leave the Freedom of Conscience” law alone and require that anyone
    running for office or performing a public service be required to list what
    they will and will not perform. Then I, as a tax payer, will have the “freedom”
    to choose who gets my money for services rendered and, likewise, the
    professionals will have the “freedom” to choose what services they will
    or won’t perform. BTW, birth control pills can abort you; something doctors
    fail to tell women.

    Simple solution.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow Us

Facebooktwitterrssby feather

Notable Columns

  • A pro-woman budget wouldn't tell me how to live my life
  • Bad medicine
  • Birth control pills have side effects
  • Canada Summer Jobs debacle–Can Trudeau call abortion a right?
  • Celebrate these Jubilee jailbirds
  • China has laws against sex selection. But not Canada. Why?
  • Family love is not a contract
  • Freedom to discuss the “choice”
  • Gender quotas don't help business or women
  • Ghomeshi case a wake-up call
  • Hidden cost of choice
  • Life at the heart of the matter
  • Life issues and the media
  • Need for rational abortion debate
  • New face of the abortion debate
  • People vs. kidneys
  • PET-P press release
  • Pro-life work is making me sick
  • Prolife doesn't mean anti-woman
  • Settle down or "lean in"
  • Sex education is all about values
  • Thank you, Camille Paglia
  • The new face of feminism
  • Today’s law worth discussing
  • When debate is shut down in Canada’s highest places

Categories

  • All Posts
  • Assisted Suicide/Euthanasia
  • Charitable
  • Ethics
  • Featured Media
  • Featured Posts
  • Feminism
  • Free Expression
  • International
  • Motherhood
  • Other
  • Political
  • Pregnancy Care Centres
  • Reproductive Technologies

All Posts

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Copyright © 2022 · News Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in