ProWomanProLife

  • The Story
  • The Women
  • Notable Columns
  • Contact Us
You are here: Home / All Posts / No more need to raise funds? But not because we found a cure

No more need to raise funds? But not because we found a cure

September 8, 2009 by Andrea Mrozek 5 Comments

My friend muses:

So I was watching the kids out doing the Shinerama today, raising money for cystic fibrosis research when it dawned on me. They are raising money for this cause, to find a cure for an awful disease, while also supporting strongly the death of such children before they are born through their student governments and unfettered access to abortion. CF rates fell from 1/2714 before pre-natal genetic testing to 1/3608 in 2000. It could be even lower now.

I’m grateful to disability rights folks for raising these points–it’s incumbent on the rest of us to connect the dots between abortion and the effects it has on the differently-abled around us. Or not around us, as the case is more and more.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmailby feather

Filed Under: All Posts Tagged With: Cystic Fibrosis, Shinerama

Comments

  1. Jordan says

    September 8, 2009 at 12:46 pm

    That’s one way to eliminate a disease…

    I had never thought of it like that, it’s definitely an interesting point. Smart friend!

    Reply
  2. Suricou Raven says

    September 9, 2009 at 6:38 am

    Given enough time, cystic fibrosis could be eliminated this way. Natural selection is already going about that – having just one of the recessive allele ceased to be an advantage when cholera ceased to be a common disease in developed countries.

    Down’s Syndrome is also in decline due to the availability of prenatal testing – but unlike CF, that one can’t be eliminated from the gene pool. No inherited factor.

    Reply
  3. Cynthia M. says

    September 9, 2009 at 9:34 am

    On the contrary Suricou. I have a PhD in Molecular Genetics. And let me assure you, natural selection has not been getting rid of CF. That’s the whole point of recessive alleles — they can stick around at high frequencies because carriers pass on the mutant alleles, often without ever even knowing they carry the gene.
    CF is not merely implicated in cholera. It is implicated in many diarrheal illnesses — including typhoid, and the very predominant E. coli. I am certain you will agree that E. coli is still very much a factor, even in developed countries. (Canada’s own recent tragedy with Walkerton is testament to this).
    So I would disagree with Suricou’s comment and reiterate that there is a chilling truth to what was posted on PWPL. Natural selection is not making a dent in CF. A decline in the observed incidence of cystic fibrosis is due to prenatal testing.

    And there is nothing “natural” about that.

    Reply
  4. Julie Culshaw says

    September 9, 2009 at 7:51 pm

    I was wondering the very same thing myself, when I saw the college students collecting for CF. How many of them have any idea that these kids are being aborted? perhaps I will have to start talking to them. Thanks for the info.

    Reply
  5. Suricou Raven says

    September 10, 2009 at 11:11 am

    Cynthia, I didn’t say anything about speed :> It’s been perhaps a hundred years here since cholora ceased to be a major disease of the lower classes. That’s a whole four generations. You’re not going to see anything happen in four generations. Give it another few hundred.

    Artificial selection isn’t going to make any significent impact either – it’s just not widely available in population terms. I only meant to say that the CF allele *could* be eliminated, in theory, given enough resources. Not that it would be practical in the immediate future, or even the near future.

    Reply

Leave a Reply to Jordan Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow Us

Facebooktwitterrssby feather

Notable Columns

  • A pro-woman budget wouldn't tell me how to live my life
  • Bad medicine
  • Birth control pills have side effects
  • Canada Summer Jobs debacle–Can Trudeau call abortion a right?
  • Celebrate these Jubilee jailbirds
  • China has laws against sex selection. But not Canada. Why?
  • Family love is not a contract
  • Freedom to discuss the “choice”
  • Gender quotas don't help business or women
  • Ghomeshi case a wake-up call
  • Hidden cost of choice
  • Life at the heart of the matter
  • Life issues and the media
  • Need for rational abortion debate
  • New face of the abortion debate
  • People vs. kidneys
  • PET-P press release
  • Pro-life work is making me sick
  • Prolife doesn't mean anti-woman
  • Settle down or "lean in"
  • Sex education is all about values
  • Thank you, Camille Paglia
  • The new face of feminism
  • Today’s law worth discussing
  • When debate is shut down in Canada’s highest places
  • Whither feminism?

Categories

  • All Posts
  • Assisted Suicide/Euthanasia
  • Charitable
  • Ethics
  • Featured Media
  • Featured Posts
  • Feminism
  • Free Expression
  • International
  • Motherhood
  • Other
  • Political
  • Pregnancy Care Centres
  • Reproductive Technologies

All Posts

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Copyright © 2022 · News Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in