ProWomanProLife

  • The Story
  • The Women
  • Notable Columns
  • Contact Us
You are here: Home / All Posts / Sad news on the human dignity motion

Sad news on the human dignity motion

April 10, 2014 by Faye Sonier 2 Comments

I really shouldn’t read the news before going to bed. But here it is:

During routine procedures at 10:00 AM Eastern time, some Members of Parliament voted “nay” when MP Woodworth asked for unanimous consent.

Under Parliamentary rules Woodworth could not, without unanimous consent, bring this Motion to a vote and his only option was to seek unanimous consent from all Members.

There are no other Parliamentary options for Motion 476. “This marks a dark and dangerous day for Canada,” Woodworth said. “Members of Parliament who voted against this motion have refused to endorse the essential principle of democratic governance which requires legal recognition of the equal worth and dignity of every member of the human family.”

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmailby feather

Filed Under: All Posts

Comments

  1. Jon says

    April 12, 2014 at 7:00 pm

    Make no mistake about it–I am 100% pro-life–but somewhat cantankerously sometimes I play the devil’s advocate. And I also think that religion is a deciding factor in the abortion debate as it is in life in general. The “human family” of which Mr. Woodworth speaks only exists because of the nuclear family in which a man and his wife have children made in their image, half-father and half-mother. As the potter has power over the clay, so parents as authors of their children do have parental rights. I think the primary reason that they do NOT have the right to kill their children is the Christian understanding that man (Adam’s) Father is God, and He as their originator has said–after the Fall, no less–that they were made in His image so that He keeps the authority to decide their length of days. Of course, since He gave His minister, the civil government, the power of the sword (Romans 13), it also has the right to kill in the performance of its responsibility of punishing violence.

    Reply
  2. Dan says

    April 15, 2014 at 5:09 pm

    We need to know which of our MPs voted against this. Does anyone know where we can find that information?

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow Us

Facebooktwitterrssby feather

Notable Columns

  • A pro-woman budget wouldn't tell me how to live my life
  • Bad medicine
  • Birth control pills have side effects
  • Canada Summer Jobs debacle–Can Trudeau call abortion a right?
  • Celebrate these Jubilee jailbirds
  • China has laws against sex selection. But not Canada. Why?
  • Family love is not a contract
  • Freedom to discuss the “choice”
  • Gender quotas don't help business or women
  • Ghomeshi case a wake-up call
  • Hidden cost of choice
  • Life at the heart of the matter
  • Life issues and the media
  • Need for rational abortion debate
  • New face of the abortion debate
  • People vs. kidneys
  • PET-P press release
  • Pro-life work is making me sick
  • Prolife doesn't mean anti-woman
  • Settle down or "lean in"
  • Sex education is all about values
  • Thank you, Camille Paglia
  • The new face of feminism
  • Today’s law worth discussing
  • When debate is shut down in Canada’s highest places

Categories

  • All Posts
  • Assisted Suicide/Euthanasia
  • Charitable
  • Ethics
  • Featured Media
  • Featured Posts
  • Feminism
  • Free Expression
  • International
  • Motherhood
  • Other
  • Political
  • Pregnancy Care Centres
  • Reproductive Technologies

All Posts

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Copyright © 2022 · News Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in