ProWomanProLife

  • The Story
  • The Women
  • Notable Columns
  • Contact Us
You are here: Home / All Posts / Andrea Mrozek, “abortion foe” and “big slice of heaven”

Andrea Mrozek, “abortion foe” and “big slice of heaven”

May 17, 2014 by Faye Sonier 6 Comments

Andrea has been called many things in her years of pro-life work. Today, the Post referred to her as an “abortion foe.”

And she now refers to herself as a “big slice of heaven.” Seriously. I got a text message to that effect last night.

(My husband may or may not have given her a particularly sappy birthday card from us. Which may or may not have referred to her birthday as a “big slice of heaven.” Going forward of course, I (and we?) need to now refer to Ms. Mrozek as a “big slice of heaven.”)

See the Post article here.

_______________

Andrea adds: It was quite a card, I must say!

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmailby feather

Filed Under: All Posts

Comments

  1. Melissa says

    May 17, 2014 at 7:25 pm

    I’ve gotta say, I don’t think I like it that Andrea was juxtaposed alongside Joyce Arthur. I think Andrea is a million times more reasonable than Joyce. (But I would say that, wouldn’t I?)

    Any chance of the mainstream media getting a better spokesperson for the prochoice side than Joyce Arthur? Man, but I wish that those crisis pregnancy centres had continued with their lawsuits!

    BTW, you gotta love how they place pictures of anti- and pro-abortion protesters alongside one another, as if the protests were about the same magnitude and intensity.

    Reply
  2. Brigid says

    May 18, 2014 at 5:57 am

    Two themes in the public sphere must be challenged: the coat hanger narrative, which, from what I have heard, has no basis in reality, but has become a bizarre pro-abortion symbol, and the “woman’s right to choose” mantra, which makes me crazy. If we deconstruct the latter, it (once again) makes women solely responsible for addressing the consequences (or outcome) of sexual activity. Wasn’t that what feminisim railed against back in the day?

    Reply
  3. Andrea Mrozek says

    May 19, 2014 at 8:44 am

    Brigid, good point: “woman’s right to choose” mantra, which makes me crazy. If we deconstruct the latter, it (once again) makes women solely responsible for addressing the consequences (or outcome) of sexual activity. Wasn’t that what feminisim railed against back in the day?”

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow Us

Facebooktwitterrssby feather

Notable Columns

  • A pro-woman budget wouldn't tell me how to live my life
  • Bad medicine
  • Birth control pills have side effects
  • Canada Summer Jobs debacle–Can Trudeau call abortion a right?
  • Celebrate these Jubilee jailbirds
  • China has laws against sex selection. But not Canada. Why?
  • Family love is not a contract
  • Freedom to discuss the “choice”
  • Gender quotas don't help business or women
  • Ghomeshi case a wake-up call
  • Hidden cost of choice
  • Life at the heart of the matter
  • Life issues and the media
  • Need for rational abortion debate
  • New face of the abortion debate
  • People vs. kidneys
  • PET-P press release
  • Pro-life work is making me sick
  • Prolife doesn't mean anti-woman
  • Settle down or "lean in"
  • Sex education is all about values
  • Thank you, Camille Paglia
  • The new face of feminism
  • Today’s law worth discussing
  • When debate is shut down in Canada’s highest places
  • Whither feminism?

Categories

  • All Posts
  • Assisted Suicide/Euthanasia
  • Charitable
  • Ethics
  • Featured Media
  • Featured Posts
  • Feminism
  • Free Expression
  • International
  • Motherhood
  • Other
  • Political
  • Pregnancy Care Centres
  • Reproductive Technologies

All Posts

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Copyright © 2023 · News Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in