ProWomanProLife

  • The Story
  • The Women
  • Notable Columns
  • Contact Us
You are here: Home / All Posts / Hum, that doesn’t look good

Hum, that doesn’t look good

January 27, 2010 by Brigitte Pellerin 4 Comments

I like what James O’Keefe did in the past, especially that famous sting operation on ACORN. I’m not too sure what this is about, but I don’t like what it looks like one bit.

_____________________

UPDATE: Reader Maryann sends this, which suggests the story might be less embarrassing for O’Keefe than the first reports indicated. I certainly hope so.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmailby feather

Filed Under: All Posts

Comments

  1. maryann says

    January 28, 2010 at 8:00 am

    Dear Brigitte, As I thought, please see the latest on O’Keefe

    http://patterico.com/2010/01/27/law-enforcement-official-no-wiretap-attempt-by-okeefe/

    Reply
  2. Lauri Friesen says

    January 28, 2010 at 9:41 am

    So, Brigitte, you still haven’t learned to wait for all the facts before jumping with the MSM to an asinine conclusion? You really thought the WaPo wouldn’t overreach on a law enforcement story involving James O’Keefe? You really thought that someone capable of the ACORN sting would think that wiretapping is a great stunt?

    Reply
    • Brigitte Pellerin says

      January 28, 2010 at 9:54 am

      Well, actually, Lauri, I waited a full day before posting about it. And I did say, quite clearly, that I didn’t know much about the story. I like to practice good political hygiene, and this means I don’t give people I otherwise like a free pass. I do hope there is an innocent explanation, but if there isn’t I don’t want to be complacent about it. I bitch about the Left being complacent when someone on their side does something dumb, I’m not about to start emulating them. Fair’s fair.

      Reply
  3. Lauri Friesen says

    January 28, 2010 at 10:45 am

    I didn’t say anything about giving him a pass. I think the stunts he pulls stray very close to the line between ethical and unethical, if not always that between legal or illegal. My argument is that care should be taken in passing judgment until all the facts are in. I was responding to your comment, “I don’t like what it looks like one bit”, which to my mind gave no credit to the evidence of what we actually know about O’Keefe and too much, considering what we know, to the Washington Post.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow Us

Facebooktwitterrssby feather

Notable Columns

  • A pro-woman budget wouldn't tell me how to live my life
  • Bad medicine
  • Birth control pills have side effects
  • Canada Summer Jobs debacle–Can Trudeau call abortion a right?
  • Celebrate these Jubilee jailbirds
  • China has laws against sex selection. But not Canada. Why?
  • Family love is not a contract
  • Freedom to discuss the “choice”
  • Gender quotas don't help business or women
  • Ghomeshi case a wake-up call
  • Hidden cost of choice
  • Life at the heart of the matter
  • Life issues and the media
  • Need for rational abortion debate
  • New face of the abortion debate
  • People vs. kidneys
  • PET-P press release
  • Pro-life work is making me sick
  • Prolife doesn't mean anti-woman
  • Settle down or "lean in"
  • Sex education is all about values
  • Thank you, Camille Paglia
  • The new face of feminism
  • Today’s law worth discussing
  • When debate is shut down in Canada’s highest places
  • Whither feminism?

Categories

  • All Posts
  • Assisted Suicide/Euthanasia
  • Charitable
  • Ethics
  • Featured Media
  • Featured Posts
  • Feminism
  • Free Expression
  • International
  • Motherhood
  • Other
  • Political
  • Pregnancy Care Centres
  • Reproductive Technologies

All Posts

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Copyright © 2025 · News Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in