Archives for August 2009

I have no idea who Kourtney Kardashian is – I gather she’s famous, but since I don’t watch television I can’t tell you if that’s true or not (I know; I’m hopelessly out of touch, especially when Rebecca fails to keep me updated about this stuff). But that’s not the point. I just wanted to say: Kudos for doing the right thing.

_____________________

Rebecca adds: The Kardashians are a bizarre clan. Their stepdad is former Olympian Bruce Jenner, who has had so much plastic surgery as to look unrecognizable (is this Michael Phelps in 30 years’ time?) and their only other claim to fame, however tenuous, seems to be steatopygianism. I am happy that she is speaking publicly about choosing not to abort. Does it make me a curmudgeon, though, that she needed her hand held to tell her family she was expecting?

It kan’t be easy koping with parenthood if a frank discussion with your siblings is so daunting.

_____________________

Andrea adds: Rebecca, you do know that “can’t”  and “coping” start with “c”? Anyhoo, I heard about this star’s decision to keep her baby and a whole flurry of thoughts went through my head. Why was this agonizing for her? (She’s 30 and must be aware that sex can sometimes lead to pregnancy–even if you are on The Pill.) But then I realized, no, we can’t take this for granted. Our culture is very abortion-friendly. So yes, kudos (with a “k”) to Kourtney for keeping the baby, also for going public with the process.

______________________

Rebecca can’t resist adding to this thread: KK (I really hope her middle name starts with a different letter) on eating while pregnant:

“You know what’s weird? Like, I always thought, like, if I was pregnant I would eat like, McDonald’s or like, Taco Bell all day long or something,” she says. “I’m not craving those things. Like, I’ve been craving, like, cold stuff like frozen yogurt and smoothies and like, I’ve been eating way more fruit then I used to eat before.”

When editors like you, they edit your quotes to make you sound less like a 12 year old.

Oh dear:

The widespread tendency in Brazil for men to remarry women several decades younger–called the “Viagra effect”–is undermining the country’s pension system, researchers warned Tuesday.

The report, by Brazil’s National Social Security Institute, showed that a trend of men in their 60s marrying women half their age was leaving a big pool of young widows collecting benefits for much longer than anticipated.

“The social security system was planned so that the wife receives her husband’s pension for only 15 years or so. With growing life expectancy and remarriages with much younger women, benefits today stretch out over 35 years,” said the author of the study, Paulo Tafner.

I know not every member of the PWPL team agrees with the “show the truth” method of convincing Canadians that abortion is wrong. I do. It’s one method that will change some minds. (And other methods that will change other minds.) Here’s a new video from the Centre for Bio-Ethical Reform, in Calgary, Alberta.  Have a look and see what you think. I think it’s well done, if a bit long for the YouTube crowd.

[youtube:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cl9-MCgmMTg”>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cl9-MCgmMTg]

For those who’ve been following the debate, here’s the update: Quebec retreats on plans to tighten abortion rules.

Quebec’s Health Minister is under fire for a proposal to tighten rules for private abortion clinics, forcing him to retreat on the politically volatile issue amid calls for his resignation.

Clinics threatened to close and others protested after Quebec said it would impose stringent new guidelines on them.

The guidelines, contained in a new law, would subject the private abortion clinics to the same standards as clinics that perform procedures such as cataract or hip-replacement surgery. Critics say the move would be costly and create a less welcoming environment for patients.

But of course. Abortion is an essential health service, they say. Just not one that requires the same kind of stringent rules as, say, health clinics that remove bits of unwanted tissue from some people’s eyes. It’s all perfectly clear.

And you know who you are, you beautiful women you. That’s not just me saying it, it’s actual science:

However, it’s not just the propensity of attractive women to have more kids that is pumping beautiful genes into the female pool. The fairer among us also tend to conceive more daughters than sons. In a government-backed study of 15,000 Americans, the most good-looking couples were 26 per cent less likely to have boys. Evolutionary psychologists Alan Miller and Satoshi Kanazawa explain this trend in in their 2007 book Why Beautiful People Have More Daughters. In part, the sex of a child is dependent, they argue, on the traits its parents have that are most beneficial to survival. And because being good-looking is a more significant factor in the reproductive success of women than men, it follows that pretty people would have more girls.

OK, now I’m ready for a study that says smarter people are more likely to have boys. Wouldn’t that start a nice fight?

__________________________

Véronique – who has 4 very good looking daughters –  is glad to be improving the gene pool. It was nothing at all. Really. You are all welcome.

A study just for me:

Women who drink moderate amounts of beer may be strengthening their bones, according to Spanish researchers.

Their study of almost 1,700 women, published in the journal Nutrition, found bone density was better in regular drinkers than non-drinkers.

But the team added that plant hormones in the beer rather than the alcohol may be responsible for the effects.

Experts urged caution, warning that drinking more than two units of alcohol a day was known to harm bone health.

Me, I like to share a beer with hubby before dinner, and have a small sip of red wine during dinner. I think I’ll keep it up. Cheers!

Remind me again why we’re in Afghanistan? Oh right. So we can make sure only nice moderates like this one are in power:

A controversial bill that Afghan President Hamid Karzai promised to review before implementing quietly became law last month, allowing police to enforce language that stipulates a wife’s sexual duties and restricts a woman’s ability to leave her own home.

Karzai had promised to send the bill to parliament before it was published, but this week women’s rights advocates learned it had already become an enforceable law despite heavy international and national criticism.

The Shiite Personal Status Law which applies to the country’s minority Shiite women, was originally even more pernicious than the final version. In March a western embassy translated a portion of the law as defining a woman’s role as “readiness for sex and not leaving the house without the husband’s permission.”