ProWomanProLife

  • The Story
  • The Women
  • Notable Columns
  • Contact Us
You are here: Home / All Posts / And now for some useful information

And now for some useful information

September 10, 2009 by Brigitte Pellerin 4 Comments

Apparently, there is a science to choosing the fastest checkout lane at the grocery store. I’m going to be trying this one.

Each person in a grocery store checkout lane approximates 48 seconds in addition to whatever is in his/her cart (this average time includes exchanged greetings and the payment process). Each item in a cart is only 2.8 seconds. Therefore, 17 items in someone’s cart is the same as an extra person. So, it is usually better to hop in line behind the one woman with 30 items (132 seconds) instead of the three-person Express Lane (which will be between 153 and 270 seconds).

This assumes clerks are similarly fast (not a rule where I shop). Also, it doesn’t say anything about those U-Scan self-checkout machines. I’d love to know how to spot the clueless before I stupidly park my cart behind them.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmailby feather

Filed Under: All Posts

Comments

  1. Suricou Raven says

    September 10, 2009 at 11:27 am

    The queue system used at supermarkets is mathematically-speaking extremally unfair and unpredictable. I’ve studied queue theory – I’m trained in networking, it’s something we need to know. The optimal queueing stratagy is common-queue. The fact that supermarkets don’t use this is down to a matter of pure practicality: To physically impliment a common-queue system would require a prohibitative amount of floor space. It’d also be more prone to confusion caused by children running around, people running back to pick up an item they forgot, and so on.

    Reply
  2. Deborah says

    September 10, 2009 at 2:01 pm

    You know what doesn’t make sense about the express lane? The supermarket rewards their least valuable customers with their own lane. What’s that all about?

    I’m totally on board with Siricou’s idea. That absolutely make the most sense if it could be implemented.

    Reply
  3. Suricou Raven says

    September 10, 2009 at 7:45 pm

    The designation of an express lane doesn’t actually improve throughput over just making it a non-express lane. Not does it lower the average waiting time. It’s purpose is to improve consistancy – to make everyone wait for a reasonable time, rather than have some people wait a very short time and others a very long time. Express customers screw up the distribution of the main queues, as they are effectively illusionary time-consumers.

    And… there goes my laptop. Goodbuy, £600 for a replacement. I was hopeing it’d last another month or two, but the power input finally packed in while I was typing. Been going for weeks. On batteries now. And no, it’s not the charger.

    Reply
  4. Reid says

    September 18, 2009 at 10:06 pm

    Although sexist, middle age men shopping alone are absolute race cars through the check out. They don’t like to shop, they have their list and just want to get in and get out. No chit chat with the check out clerk, they will have their bags packed efficiently and quickly and with a wallet rather than a purse the size of a small city, payment is also quick. I would take a line with 3 or 4 or these guys holding 10 items each rather than a single matron with a dozen oranges!

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow Us

Facebooktwitterrssby feather

Notable Columns

  • A pro-woman budget wouldn't tell me how to live my life
  • Bad medicine
  • Birth control pills have side effects
  • Canada Summer Jobs debacle–Can Trudeau call abortion a right?
  • Celebrate these Jubilee jailbirds
  • China has laws against sex selection. But not Canada. Why?
  • Family love is not a contract
  • Freedom to discuss the “choice”
  • Gender quotas don't help business or women
  • Ghomeshi case a wake-up call
  • Hidden cost of choice
  • Life at the heart of the matter
  • Life issues and the media
  • Need for rational abortion debate
  • New face of the abortion debate
  • People vs. kidneys
  • PET-P press release
  • Pro-life work is making me sick
  • Prolife doesn't mean anti-woman
  • Settle down or "lean in"
  • Sex education is all about values
  • Thank you, Camille Paglia
  • The new face of feminism
  • Today’s law worth discussing
  • When debate is shut down in Canada’s highest places
  • Whither feminism?

Categories

  • All Posts
  • Assisted Suicide/Euthanasia
  • Charitable
  • Ethics
  • Featured Media
  • Featured Posts
  • Feminism
  • Free Expression
  • International
  • Motherhood
  • Other
  • Political
  • Pregnancy Care Centres
  • Reproductive Technologies

All Posts

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Copyright © 2025 · News Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in