ProWomanProLife

  • The Story
  • The Women
  • Notable Columns
  • Contact Us
You are here: Home / Archives for Andrea Mrozek

13 days

May 6, 2016 by Andrea Mrozek Leave a Comment

13 Days. This is the new length of time that scientists have been able to grow an embryo outside the womb.

On the one hand, this is very cool. It shows the miracle of the embryo, which the scientist comments on herself:

It had been “absolutely unbelievable”, she said, to see the “amazing, self-organising ability” of the cells. “They have to talk to themselves and together they make something more beautiful,” Zernicka-Goetz said.

On the other hand, we were all embryos once, so any experimentation is taking place at cost of someone’s life. I do realize that IVF isn’t terribly successful and that 70 percent of embryos once implanted in a womb don’t make it. That said, 30 percent do, and all of us were once embyros, so this is not something to take lightly. pregnant-393364_960_720

Filed Under: All Posts, Featured Posts

Jennifer Roback Morse summarizes why surrogacy is a bad idea

May 4, 2016 by Andrea Mrozek Leave a Comment

Great article, with all the problems listed in one place.

Whether you are progressive or conservative, feminist or pro-life, straight or gay, surrogacy is not the answer.

JRM

Jennifer Roback Morse of the Ruth Institute http://www.ruthinstitute.org/

 

Filed Under: All Posts, Featured Posts, Feminism

About that documentary Hush

April 29, 2016 by Andrea Mrozek 2 Comments

HUSH is a film by Mighty Motion Pictures that views through both lenses the controversial field of research around abortion’s health risks. Canadian director and pro-choice advocate Punam Kumar Gill collaborates with Canadian producer and pro-life advocate Joses Martin to investigate the long-term effects of having an abortion.

[Tweet “Hush is not pro-choice or pro-life. It’s pro-information”].

Read about the documentary and then download and view it!

hush

 

Filed Under: All Posts, Featured Posts

ProWoman and ProLife: Not a ruse or a PR strategy

April 26, 2016 by Andrea Mrozek 4 Comments

Articles like these do not reflect my sentiment as a pro-life woman. Being pro-life/anti-abortion/whatever-you-want-to-call-it reflects a genuinely pro-woman sentiment, not some rebranding so that my message can be more tenable. Ours is the novel idea that women ought to be accepted in all their reproductive capacities. Certainly my view also partners with the humanity of the preborn–we are not aborting cucumbers, after all–to suggest that there is something of value, a fetus, which is the result (in many instances) of a natural thing called sex. These are facts on the ground that we need to recognize.

The author also adds that pro-life folks lost the battle long ago. I’d argue the presence of his column is evidence that the pro-choice victory has not been complete. In order for a complete pro-choice victory to occur, we would have to wipe out all joy at the prospect of a wanted child being born. When that happens, women might feel entirely unconflicted about the act of abortion.

However, since that won’t happen, we will muddle through with pro-lifers and pro-choicers alike muttering about the matter. It’s just not going to go away quietly into the realm of non-controversial.

Screen Shot 2016-04-26 at 09.00.31

 

Filed Under: All Posts, Featured Posts, Feminism

There ought to be a law…

April 26, 2016 by Andrea Mrozek Leave a Comment

…Well, not always. What is immoral cannot always be illegal, nor should it be. Me in The Federalist on Jian Ghomeshi. My friend Rebecca Walberg, once PWPL blogger, would say this article falls into the “In Defence of Stigma” category.

There is a third way to consider this troubling trial. It is that Ghomeshi is simultaneously guilty in the culture by moral standards, yet not guilty in a court of law. This view encapsulates the idea that what is legal is not always moral and what is moral is not always legal. It should be perfectly feasible to stigmatize a behavior as wrong without taking it to court.

Screen Shot 2016-04-26 at 08.46.57

Filed Under: All Posts, Featured Posts, Free Expression

Ottawa Against Abortion concert

April 19, 2016 by Andrea Mrozek Leave a Comment

What: Ottawa Against Abortion Music for Life Concert

When: April 29th, 7pm (doors open at 6:30pm)

Where: St. Patrick’s Basilica (basement) (281 Nepean St.)

Why: To support OAA’s work

More information can be found on their Facebook page, here. The concert is free but there will be a silent auction and they are gladly taking donations! Come on out and support a group working to make abortion unthinkable in the Ottawa region.

This concert will be way more fun than sitting around with your headphones on!

This concert will be way more fun than sitting around with your headphones on!

Filed Under: All Posts, Featured Posts

Canada Is A Complicit Partner In Sex-Selection Abortion

April 14, 2016 by Andrea Mrozek 3 Comments

My latest, up at Huff Post:

In the middle of writing this piece, I got an urgent email. A woman with an in-utero diagnosis of trisomy aborted her second trimester child. She is now suicidal. Did I know of anyone who could help?

This is the modern face of abortion that few publicize, though suicide and suicidal ideation are known risks when abortion is chosen for wanted pregnancies. (There’s a new documentary coming out called Hush that explains this. It is being pre-screened April 16, 2016.)

Canada loses roughly 280 human beings to abortion every day. Annually, that’s like losing the number of people in Waterloo, Ontario.

What bothers us about this number, what bothers us about the post-abortive suicidal woman is basically… nothing at all. We care only that when abortion happens, females and males die in equal numbers.

It’s not Indo-Canadians alone who have a problem. Cultural change is needed in many more communities and homes across Canada. We can start by re-evaluating our own openness to abortion at any time, for any reason.

mourning-360500_960_720

 

Filed Under: All Posts, Featured Media, Feminism

Sex selection abortion in Canada

April 11, 2016 by Andrea Mrozek 2 Comments

It’s happening, a recent study published in the Canadian Medical Association Journal says.

While the natural odds of having a boy over a girl are slightly higher, they are consistent across the globe: up to 107 boys for every 100 girls. But Indian-born mothers living in Canada with two children had 138 boys for every 100 girls. In Ontario, that number inflated even more among Indian-born women with two daughters, who then gave birth to 196 boys for every 100 girls.

After abortions, the numbers rise dramatically: 326 boys after one abortion, 409 boys after multiple abortions, and 663 boys for every 100 girls following multiple abortions in the second trimester, when doctors can determine the sex of the fetus.

indian-1158807__180

 

Filed Under: All Posts, Featured Posts

#280Today

April 11, 2016 by Andrea Mrozek 4 Comments

Thunderclap_280today_pic280 is the number of abortions in Canada daily.

Watch a video about this new social media campaign from Life Canada here.

It’s amazing to me that this goes unnoticed. We are used to it; we get confused (Person? Fetus? Human being? Child? What is it?)

But regardless of what you think the fetus is in the moment it is aborted, the loss of a city the size of Waterloo every year is a pretty sad fact, a huge loss of potential. It is our downfall that we cannot welcome children into our lives with greater ease. That we see so much else as being more important.

This is an individual tragedy, that many women mourn. It’s also a collective tragedy for which we must all take responsibility.

How easy have I made it for a woman to see her pregnancy through to full term? That’s the question I’m asking myself today.

This isn’t about pointing fingers at women who have had abortions, or the men who took them to the clinic. It’s about all of us and what we desire for this country.

Filed Under: All Posts, Featured Posts

We should be outraged by this

April 7, 2016 by Andrea Mrozek Leave a Comment

I am glad people are outraged by this.

When Felipe Montoya applied three years ago to become a permanent resident of Canada with his wife and two children, he ran into those barriers. One of Montoya’s children, his son Nicolas, has Down syndrome, a condition that prompted Citizenship and Immigration Canada (CIC) to determine that Montoya and family may be inadmissible on health grounds. Montoya, a native of Costa Rica, has been a professor of environmental studies at York University for the past four years. As numerous news stories have reported, on March 3 he received a letter from CIC — signed, “Sincerely, DO877” — saying that “it appears that you or your family member may not meet the requirements for immigration to Canada.”

The letter from D0877, following wording dictated by bureaucratic form letters, continues: “I have determined that your family member Nicolas Montoya is a person whose health condition might reasonably be expected to cause excessive demands on social services in Canada. An excessive demand is demand for which the anticipated costs exceed the average Canadian per capita health and social services costs, which is currently set at $6,387 per year. Pursuant to subsection 38(1) … of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, it therefore appears that you may be inadmissible on health grounds.” The reason: “Your family member, Nicolas Montoya, has the following medical condition: Down’s syndrome.”

We should also be outraged that this same mentality–children who are different are too difficult and too expensive–encourages the vast majority of women to abort their children when they receive a prenatal diagnosis of a genetic abnormality.

down-syndrome-389671_960_720

Filed Under: All Posts, Featured Posts

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • …
  • 279
  • Next Page »

Follow Us

Facebooktwitterrssby feather

Notable Columns

  • A pro-woman budget wouldn't tell me how to live my life
  • Bad medicine
  • Birth control pills have side effects
  • Canada Summer Jobs debacle–Can Trudeau call abortion a right?
  • Celebrate these Jubilee jailbirds
  • China has laws against sex selection. But not Canada. Why?
  • Family love is not a contract
  • Freedom to discuss the “choice”
  • Gender quotas don't help business or women
  • Ghomeshi case a wake-up call
  • Hidden cost of choice
  • Life at the heart of the matter
  • Life issues and the media
  • Need for rational abortion debate
  • New face of the abortion debate
  • People vs. kidneys
  • PET-P press release
  • Pro-life work is making me sick
  • Prolife doesn't mean anti-woman
  • Settle down or "lean in"
  • Sex education is all about values
  • Thank you, Camille Paglia
  • The new face of feminism
  • Today’s law worth discussing
  • When debate is shut down in Canada’s highest places
  • Whither feminism?

Categories

  • All Posts
  • Assisted Suicide/Euthanasia
  • Charitable
  • Ethics
  • Featured Media
  • Featured Posts
  • Feminism
  • Free Expression
  • International
  • Motherhood
  • Other
  • Political
  • Pregnancy Care Centres
  • Reproductive Technologies

All Posts

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Copyright © 2026 · News Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in