The cardinal tenet of the Contraceptive Regime is that The Pill safely sterilizes the sexual act. As a result of this belief, we accept the idea that we can have sex with anyone we want, without regard for potential consequences. We think we can have sex with a person who would be a disaster to parent with. And when the inevitable pregnancy actually occurs, we act surprised every time. Women are then faced with the choice of becoming a single mother, having an abortion or placing the baby for adoption. None of these choices is particularly good for the child, nor in the end, for the woman.
Dear Mary Wollstonecraft
I am writing a book about the sexual revolution with my friend Rebecca Walberg. More accurately, I am researching a book right now, so please don’t ask me how writing is going for I will rapidly begin to hyperventilate and it will be awkward for everyone.
I am using this opportunity to catch up on the women’s studies education I never had. And, quite frankly, never wished I had. I’m starting my reading at the very beginning, with a historical defence of the rights of women. Enter one Mary Wollstonecraft.
As a side comment, I’m intrigued by her description of problems she sees around her, which I would hazard to say, in some instances are not all that different today.
So on I read, and enjoying it more than I thought.
Mary Wollstonecraft is long-winded, yes, even more than I. And so in reading today I flipped forward in the pages to see when the chapter would end and what the next chapter might be about.
The next chapter is called: “Chapter III: THE SAME SUBJECT CONTINUED.”
And there you have it. Who said that a spirited defence of women’s rights had to have creative chapter headings? Not I.
New Brunswick strikes down existing abortion laws
When I read this, I am not thinking “another one bites the dust.”
OK, I kind of am.
Yet, when I think about what it means to be pro-life, it doesn’t fundamentally have to do with two doctors advising on a committee. The chances are very high those doctors were advising in favour of this misogynistic thing called abortion.
My pro-life stand has to do with the creation of a world where life is cherished, women thrive, their babies live, it’s possible to work as a mother in and out of the home and be valued in both roles, there is supportive parenting, fathers are meaningfully involved… sexual assault is severely punished, people help each other in strong communities… and unicorns prance about under rainbows. I added that last one to check if you were still paying attention.
I think people who are pro-choice share my vision for a better world, it’s just they think abortion can be part of that world. I think we face an imperfect world this side of heaven, but I’m ready and willing to fight for that which would move us in a better direction. The eradication of abortion as a solution constitutes one such step. Making abortion unthinkable does not rely on doctor’s committees or laws in general. It has to do with what we believe to be possible and true in our hearts.
Freedom of Choice, T.M.
Products for women…from people who care.
This university bathroom ad on top of a tampon machine is either severely outdated or going for a retro look. (I took the photo this morning.) Note the trademark on freedom of choice, too. Reminds how pro-life or pro-choice, we are all selling an idea, a worldview. People who are activist and pro-choice abuse the word “freedom,” kicking it around and making it meaningless. Freedom, free will gives us the right to make good choices, which leads to more freedom. Freedom that sells bad choices enslaves. I believe we are all free to make bad choices, I just think it’s better to label them as such…instead of tying up horse manure in shiny packaging and putting a bow on it. In any event, a thought-provoking trip to the loo, if I do say so myself.
Can you spot the demeaning?
This article about what makes a man just proves few today actually know.
I read it with great interest because there is a need for men to mentor men in what it means to be masculine. Fathers ideally would be doing this for their sons. However, I recall being at a conference about human sexuality where the speaker asked who had a good, strong, solid relationship with their father and I would say less than ten percent of people put up their hands. So something has gone wrong.
In any event, I think we’ve hit a spot now where we demean men and women equally (hurray?), men have poor or no role models and then we layer on uber-sexualized advertising, pop culture, etc. and it all becomes very problematic.
So this guy can say this without a hint of irony:
I love to have sex, but I don’t put notches on my belt because that’s weird and objectifying. I don’t rape because that’s weird and objectifying. I still consider myself a player, if you can call me something like that, because I still have lots of sex. I just don’t do it in ways that are demeaning to women.”
It’s time for Captain Obvious to step in here. If you call yourself a player the very concept is demeaning to not just women, but perhaps more importantly, yourself. Any man who has lots of sex with many different women is demeaning himself and those women. The same is true for women engaging in the same behaviour.
I’ve been reading some modern feminists lately and mostly I find them to be more than slightly unhinged. BUT there are moments where they describe feeling objectified or offended by sexual comments in public and I relate. It’s as though they are seeking the same standard of decency as I am, whilst expressing that in a weirdly offended and angry way.
Ladies and gentlemen: Expect renewed calls for a Prude Revolution from yours truly. Yes that’s right, we need to take back the word. Embrace it (in the words of an old Saturday Night Live sketch “say it, feel it, mean it, be it!” (said with sass). Everyone is having lots of sex everywhere and all I can see is rising despair, objectification of men and women, violence against women, and rising rates of abuse. Faced with this, I will be proudly prudish and hope to create the space for others to feel the same.
More and more girls engaging in self-harm
Not that the modern world is a hostile environment for young women or anything, you understand.
Girls account for 80 per cent of young people admitted for self-harm injury;
The number of girls admitted for cutting themselves with a sharp object rose to 173 in 2013-14 from 91 five years early, a 90 per cent increase.
And the answer is…not Justin Trudeau
So who is “he” in the quote?
He maintained that politics is about values, starting with moral values. The primary guardians of these values are not states or political organizations but free individuals endowed with a sense of responsibility.
It was actually Vaclav Havel, dissident, writer and former President of the Czech Republic. Hmmmm, I would have thought we were all deeply tuned in to the 25-year anniversary of the Velvet Revolution in Czech Republic. I went to an event in Prague once and heard Havel speak, in person. Amazing memory of Prague Castle. That I should even have a memory of Prague Castle strikes me as amazing. I digress… will save the walking down memory lane for a different post.
Vaclav Havel is someone I want to read more. Moral values are out of style somehow these days. I think he is right–everything is about morality–and we ignore that at our peril.
[Tweet “Madeleine Albright said the west didn’t win the Cold War, but rather that Communism fell.”]
I’m paraphrasing her words from a commemorative event this morning. That is an interesting sentiment, and she may be right, given what we are seeing from Putin in Russia these days.
Does this have anything to do with abortion? Only peripherally. Anytime is a good time to remind you that PWPL is a blog for pro-life women (and women who want to be pro-life but need a little time) who are interested in any manner of different things, including the history of totalitarianism.
(Your friendly PWPL founder is, in any case. She feels comforted at gatherings where a larger than usual percentage of people speak English with a strong Czech accent. In a pinch, any slavic accent will do. True.)
Who is “he” in this quote?
He maintained that politics is about values, starting with moral values. The primary guardians of these values are not states or political organizations but free individuals endowed with a sense of responsibility.”
[Tweet “What politician might say politics is about moral values? Step right up and take a guess!”] (No googling.)
I will reveal the answer shortly.
Why it is good to feel lonely from time to time
I recently saw a Harry Truman quote: “If you want a friend in Washington, get a dog.”
Strikes me as being true in our culture at large. We are busy, busy, busy–going to and from social events of all kinds, but making few meaningful connections.
Being lonely is different from being alone, of course. Being alone can be edifying in many different ways. All too often our culture equates being alone with loneliness. Sometimes there is overlap.
The reason why I think feeling lonely is good is because it reminds us of the plight of those who are more lonely. Happy socializing people rarely stop to ponder whether the person in the drugstore is having a good day or not. Helping someone can stand out in a person’s mind for a long time, particularly if they are lonely.
I remember when I landed in Berlin for the year–and suddenly, after months of planning–wondered just what I was doing there. I wondered who had made this foolish decision. (Of course it was me. Makes it harder to lay blame.)
Working in the library one day, I couldn’t find the stacks I was looking for. So I asked someone. He looked at me, looked at what I was looking for and looked at me again. Then he simply said (in German), “I’ll show you.” He proceeded to take me up and down stairs and down and around long, winding corridors. When we finally landed where I needed to be about ten minutes later, he said a simple, “here.” And left.
That was in 1998 and I still remember, clear as day. I wanted to hug him, but Germans don’t do that sort of frivolous thing.
Loneliness reminds us of our longing for the eternal. Which is actually a longing for God. Which is another reminder that when we think we are alone, we are actually not.
All this to say, feeling lonely reminds us to reach out, and there are always people who need to be reached out to. Those of us who have the capacity ought to do so. To new immigrants, people for whom every last thing is new and strange. To people who live on the streets without a loving home or stable family. And even to people who think they are really busy and important as they hustle about from cocktail party to reception, but in reality live empty lives.
There are lots of people, everywhere, always–who appreciate being shown their way to the right stacks!
The Repeal of Reticence
This thought of the day courtesy of an old interview with Rochelle Gurstein, author of The Repeal of Reticence. The whole interview speaks to me, as I consider how it is that we got to be where we are. (Where are we, you ask? Base reality TV shows as entertainment, lewd advertising and crass lyrics, ramped up sexuality everywhere and what’s worse, some folks advocating for it as freeing.)
Before the turn of the century, people could only speak about sexual intimacy as either lust or love-it had a moral component built into it. What the sex reformers tried to do in the name of freeing people from Freudian neuroses was to split off sex from the valuation of shame or lust or love. This didn’t make sense to the party of reticence. They rejected the notion that we start with a fact of biology and then clothe it with some kind of value. Rather, the value and the fact are one.
- « Previous Page
- 1
- …
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- …
- 279
- Next Page »









