ProWomanProLife

  • The Story
  • The Women
  • Notable Columns
  • Contact Us
You are here: Home / All Posts / British Embryo Research Bill

British Embryo Research Bill

March 22, 2008 by Patricia Egan Leave a Comment

I cannot pretend to begin to understand the science of this, but I’m not sure how much technical background one needs to feel that there is probably something very creepy going on here. 

Among other things, the proposed bill would allow researchers to “create inter-species hybrids by injecting human DNA into a hollowed-out animal egg cell. The resulting embryo is 99.9 percent human and 0.1 percent animal.” The point of creating such an embryo is to give scientists the large number of embryos they need to make stem cells to help find cures for a range of diseases. 

Again, I’m no scientist, but the government’s defence of the bill doesn’t seem to jive with the description of what actually goes on in this kind of research, at least as it is described by Reuters. The British Health Minister, Ben Bradshaw, has defended the bill by saying that it concerns the use of “pre-embryonic cells to do research that has the potential to ease the suffering of millions of people in this country”.  

In another Reuters article, a researcher defends the practice as follows: “The aim of our experiments is to discover ways to make stem cells for anyone that will be invaluable in treating human diseases, not to give birth to some abnormal chimera.” In other words, don’t worry, none of these embryonic “chimeras” (his word, not mine) will actually survive such experiments. How reassuring. 

On the other hand, the Roman Catholic Cardinal in Scotland has denounced the bill as a “monstrous attack on human rights, human dignity and human life”.

Gee, I wonder who’s right?

By the way, according to Reuters, Canada is one of three other countries (besides the UK) where scientists carry out “similar work”. 

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmailby feather

Filed Under: All Posts Tagged With: embryonic stem-cell research

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow Us

Facebooktwitterrssby feather

Notable Columns

  • A pro-woman budget wouldn't tell me how to live my life
  • Bad medicine
  • Birth control pills have side effects
  • Canada Summer Jobs debacle–Can Trudeau call abortion a right?
  • Celebrate these Jubilee jailbirds
  • China has laws against sex selection. But not Canada. Why?
  • Family love is not a contract
  • Freedom to discuss the “choice”
  • Gender quotas don't help business or women
  • Ghomeshi case a wake-up call
  • Hidden cost of choice
  • Life at the heart of the matter
  • Life issues and the media
  • Need for rational abortion debate
  • New face of the abortion debate
  • People vs. kidneys
  • PET-P press release
  • Pro-life work is making me sick
  • Prolife doesn't mean anti-woman
  • Settle down or "lean in"
  • Sex education is all about values
  • Thank you, Camille Paglia
  • The new face of feminism
  • Today’s law worth discussing
  • When debate is shut down in Canada’s highest places
  • Whither feminism?

Categories

  • All Posts
  • Assisted Suicide/Euthanasia
  • Charitable
  • Ethics
  • Featured Media
  • Featured Posts
  • Feminism
  • Free Expression
  • International
  • Motherhood
  • Other
  • Political
  • Pregnancy Care Centres
  • Reproductive Technologies

All Posts

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Copyright © 2025 · News Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in