ProWomanProLife

  • The Story
  • The Women
  • Notable Columns
  • Contact Us
You are here: Home / Archives for All Posts / Feminism

Egg freezing: New employee perk

October 14, 2014 by Andrea Mrozek 1 Comment

I’ve now received this news item three times. This is a subtle cue for me to do a post. The undertone from those sending the item, of course, is that this is strange and/or upsetting.  And it is.

Two major companies, Apple and Facebook, are offering egg freezing as a perk for their female employees.

Two Silicon Valley giants now offer women a game-changing perk: Apple and Facebook will pay for employees to freeze their eggs. Facebook recently began covering egg freezing, and Apple will start in January, spokespeople for the companies told NBC News. The firms appear to be the first major employers to offer this coverage for non-medical reasons.

“Having a high-powered career and children is still a very hard thing to do,” said Brigitte Adams, an egg-freezing advocate and founder of the patient forum Eggsurance.com. By offering this benefit, companies are investing in women, she said, and supporting them in carving out the lives they want.

My take: This sort of “perk” highlights how this working world is very hostile to women. Work now. Work harder. Work more, in offices that are not conducive to having children. Have children, sure, but always later, later, later. But so that you feel better about that, freeze your eggs now.

It is almost exclusively my demographic that will take advantage of this. Younger women believe they can always have kids. It’s not something they question. Most women who are older than me will think it’s too late. But women in their 30s… that’s the demographic. Those women who quietly wonder what the point of the work, work, work is when there’s no family to come home to.

I think it’s insidious, to be perfectly honest. And sadly, some women will do it. Not because they think it’s a great idea, but rather because it’s an insurance policy, or so they think.

Finally, this is a symptom of a bigger problem, not the problem itself. So don’t blame the women who go ahead and do it. Just some random thoughts on the strangeness of our culture that pays lip service to giving perks to women while giving no perks to women.

Screen Shot 2014-10-14 at 3.08.11 PM

Filed Under: Featured Posts, Feminism

The Fathead Minnow on the Pill

October 13, 2014 by Andrea Mrozek 3 Comments

We study the effect of estrogen on the fish populations. I have no problem with that. We are then allowed to say if and when there are problems. Likewise, no problem with that. However, if anyone should assert that the effects of daily synthetic hormones on living, breathing women are problematic, it shall be denounced as heresy.

Here ends today’s lesson in what can and cannot be said publicly. I do hope the Fathead Minnows recover. (Everyone loves a good fishing expedition.)

Screen Shot 2014-10-13 at 8.49.23 PM

 

Filed Under: Featured Posts, Feminism

When you hear about International Day of the Girl…

October 9, 2014 by Andrea Mrozek Leave a Comment

…make sure you speak up in favour of a girl’s right to life.

Across the globe, girls are being killed off at an alarming rate, only because they are girls. This includes infanticide but also abortion.

Because this includes abortion, we tend to hear not-so-much about it.

Getting more politically incorrect, we then don’t hear about the coerced abortions of girls.

Normally, missing women results in calls for more attention, parliamentary committees, general outrage. But not when the girls are missing due to abortion.

On October 11, International Day of the Girl, make sure you remember all girls. Those who were denied education, those who were forced into early marriages, those who were denied life. I will also be remembering the hypocrisy of the United Nations for having a special day honouring girls, whilst simultaneously ignoring millions of missing women the globe over.

(For more on missing women in China, specifically, check back here for compelling presentations from a Chinese dissident Chen Guangcheng and Reggie Littlejohn of Women’s Rights Without Frontiers.)

Littlejohn2-257x300

(Reggie Littlejohn, of Women’s Rights Without Frontiers.)

Filed Under: All Posts, Featured Posts, Feminism

No, conception is not an “accident”

September 22, 2014 by Faye Sonier 8 Comments

During two of my son’s naps today,  I read some academic pro-choice philosophy.

I came across some discussion by professors Laurie Shrage and Elizabeth Brake on “forced fatherhood.” They are addressing the pro-choice tension where mothers are free to abort their children, but if children are born, fathers are not free to walk away from the children. They are forced to pay child support. These men are often referred to as “desperate.”

Quote from professor Laurie Shrage’s New York Times’ piece:

Women’s rights advocates have long struggled for motherhood to be a voluntary condition, and not one imposed by nature or culture. In places where women and girls have access to affordable and safe contraception and abortion services, and where there are programs to assist mothers in distress find foster or adoptive parents, voluntary motherhood is basically a reality. In many states, infant safe haven laws allow a birth mother to walk away from her newborn baby if she leaves it unharmed at a designated facility.

If a man accidentally conceives a child with a woman, and does not want to raise the child with her, what are his choices? Surprisingly, he has few options in the United States. He can urge her to seek an abortion, but ultimately that decision is hers to make. Should she decide to continue the pregnancy and raise the child, and should she or our government attempt to establish him as the legal father, he can be stuck with years of child support payments.

Let’s keep in mind that this tends to be the same crowd that pushes sex education on younger and younger kids, arguably with age inappropriate materials.

It seems that Sex Ed 101 teaches where babies come from. Babies are conceived via sex. Sex = babies.

[Tweet “Babie are conceived via sex. Sex = babies.”]

If that’s the case and if most people in North America are aware of this fact, how in the world can a man “accidentally” conceive a child?

This can only happen in an abortion-promoting culture where we attempt to separate sex from pro-creation. We all know that no contraception is 100% effective. But what is pretty darn effective is abortion.

And this is what leads to an inconceivable quote like this one:

In consenting to sex, neither a man nor a woman gives consent to become a parent, just as in consenting to any activity, one does not consent to yield to all the accidental outcomes that might flow from that activity.

Therefore sex no longer leads to babies, or unwanted babies in any case, therefore men and women can become “accidentally” pregnant, bear no responsibility and the child in the womb is killed or, if he/she lives, may have to do without a “desperate” parent who opted out.

The rabbit hole goes down further, but my son is hungry. Off I go.

Filed Under: All Posts, Featured Posts, Feminism

Deciding what a woman does with her body, long gone?

September 19, 2014 by Andrea Mrozek 25 Comments

…But deciding what a woman must think–now that is totally kosher.

Really ridiculous for Justin Trudeau to tweet this, that the days “when old men get to decide what a woman does with her body are long gone.” Apparently the days of dictating thought are here to stay?

I hope people realize what is happening here, and it has nothing to do with abortion in particular. Freedom of thought is at stake. For this great freedom, my parents left their home and came to this country. Not so someone could tell them what we must believe in order to be “progressive.”

 

Filed Under: All Posts, Featured Posts, Feminism

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10

Follow Us

Facebooktwitterrssby feather

Notable Columns

  • A pro-woman budget wouldn't tell me how to live my life
  • Bad medicine
  • Birth control pills have side effects
  • Canada Summer Jobs debacle–Can Trudeau call abortion a right?
  • Celebrate these Jubilee jailbirds
  • China has laws against sex selection. But not Canada. Why?
  • Family love is not a contract
  • Freedom to discuss the “choice”
  • Gender quotas don't help business or women
  • Ghomeshi case a wake-up call
  • Hidden cost of choice
  • Life at the heart of the matter
  • Life issues and the media
  • Need for rational abortion debate
  • New face of the abortion debate
  • People vs. kidneys
  • PET-P press release
  • Pro-life work is making me sick
  • Prolife doesn't mean anti-woman
  • Settle down or "lean in"
  • Sex education is all about values
  • Thank you, Camille Paglia
  • The new face of feminism
  • Today’s law worth discussing
  • When debate is shut down in Canada’s highest places
  • Whither feminism?

Categories

  • All Posts
  • Assisted Suicide/Euthanasia
  • Charitable
  • Ethics
  • Featured Media
  • Featured Posts
  • Feminism
  • Free Expression
  • International
  • Motherhood
  • Other
  • Political
  • Pregnancy Care Centres
  • Reproductive Technologies

All Posts

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Copyright © 2026 · News Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in