ProWomanProLife

  • The Story
  • The Women
  • Notable Columns
  • Contact Us
You are here: Home / Archives for All Posts

Back off dads, caring for children is a mother’s job

January 31, 2011 by Brigitte Pellerin Leave a Comment

So says this piece. Add your grain of salt in the comments.

Despite the long push for more equality in parenting duties, new research suggests that mothers and fathers may actually get along better when parenting roles are divided along more traditional lines -that is, when fathers back off caregiving duties, such as feeding and bathing, and put more effort into playtime.

Researchers at Ohio State University looked at 112 middle-class couples with four-year-old children. Researchers looked at how involved fathers were in play activities and how much they took part in caregiving.

They also observed parents working together to help their children perform certain tasks, such as building toy structures or drawing pictures.

Families in which fathers were more involved in play activities had more of what researchers called supportive interaction between the two parents.

In contrast, more of what is described by researchers as “undermining behaviour” was seen among families in which fathers do more of the caregiving.

Undermining behaviour was seen in statements such as “that’s a stupid idea” made by one parent to another, or taking separate approaches to helping their children.

It is unclear why the study yielded the results it did, but Sarah Schoppe-Sullivan, a professor of family science at Ohio State University and one of the study’s co-authors, suggested parents may be subconsciously bothered when parenting roles conflict with their pre-conceived ideas.

From the mother’s point of view, it could be a function of “maternal gatekeeping,” she said. “For mothers, maybe, it’s hard to give up some control to the father. That could be a total social effect, but there could some sort of biological underpinning to it.”

The sex of the child did make a difference in the study’s findings.

With boys, the father’s involvement in play proved to be even more beneficial to the parents’ relationship.

On the other hand, fathers’ caregiving did not have a notable negative effect when it came to girls.

“Maybe fathers just feel more confident to participate in rearing their sons,” Prof. Schoppe-Sullivan said.

“If the mother is doing something with the son that he doesn’t like, the father feels like he should say something, or he has more of a role. Whereas with girls, it may be that the father lets the mother do more what she feels is best.”

Anne-Marie Ambert, a retired professor of family studies at York University in Toronto, said it makes sense that relationships would be good between couples where the father plays with the kids.

“Mothers are probably very appreciative when fathers

play with children, because it does take the children off their backs,” she said.

“Also, it’s very good for the children; the children are more active.”

She said it is less clear why having fathers involved in the caregiving would cause problems.

“You would think that caregiving from the father would make mothers much happier.”

Filed Under: All Posts

Why we have children

January 29, 2011 by Brigitte Pellerin Leave a Comment

A longish but extremely touching piece on why we have children. Get a cup of coffee, settle in, and enjoy.

____________________

Andrea adds: What a piece.

We have no choice but to give ourselves for our children, but we learn that in giving ourselves we receive our selves. In the frailty of this little form that called such an immense love out of me, this bundle of winsome life and running legs and embracing arms, I share in the quintessentially human condition of loving recklessly what is fragile, fleeting, and at risk. There is nothing for it; I cannot help myself. Even at thirteen months, my daughter was sweet and vulnerable and of immeasurable sacred worth. She was not perfect, but she was everything that was good in me, and yet so much better, the highest art I had created, my only true thing in a counterfeit world. She was my little girl.

Filed Under: All Posts

In this world nothing is certain

January 29, 2011 by Jennifer Derwey 5 Comments

…but death and taxes. That’s right, it’s tax time again. It’s possibly my least favorite time of year, as I have to file as an ex-patriot not one but TWO tax returns to various scary acronyms (IRS, CRA). Not to pat my own back, but I’ve become something of a North American tax wizard (no, I am not taking requests to file other people’s taxes). But while I don’t fear my own audit, I do hope the accountants have their red pens primed for looking at the tax payouts on a federal level.

Remember that revolutionary slogan, “No taxation without representation!” Well, for many people, that tyranny is just what happens with each and every paycheque. Organizations, like Planned Parenthood, have received billions of tax payer dollars over the past 20 years.

As my pro-choice friend once told me, “It’s okay if you’re pro-life, so long as you don’t object to anyone else having an abortion.” Even with this flawed logic it’s clear, even to pro-choice individuals, that the large population who object in the US and in Canada shouldn’t be paying for the procedure.

From Minnesota,

The people of Minnesota have never voted to pay for abortions with state money, and neither has the state Legislature. Taxpayer funding of abortion was imposed upon us by a wrongly decided court case known as Doe vs. Gomez in the mid-1990s.

Now it is time for the Legislature to represent the will of the people by passing a ban on taxpayer-funded abortions, and for Gov. Mark Dayton to allow the ban to become law. We know that Gov. Dayton supports abortion; he always has. But many who consider themselves “pro-choice” acknowledge that using tax dollars to pay for elective abortions goes too far.

Funding abortion seems especially unwise at a time when the state faces a massive $6.5 billion deficit. Paying abortionists to kill unborn Minnesotans is an expense that we simply cannot afford, and that unborn babies can live without.

According to the Minnesota Department of Human Services, taxpayers bought 50,869 abortions at a cost of $15.6 million between July of 1994 and December of 2008.

[…]

I know the argument will be made by the other side that poor women ought to have the same access to abortion as rich women. But if we really want what’s best for disadvantaged mothers and their babies, we will help them, not offer them abortions.

______________________

Brigitte wonders: Am I the only one who noticed the slogan buried in this story? “Abortion: An expense unborn babies can live without.”

Filed Under: All Posts

That Danish study on abortion and mental health…

January 28, 2011 by Andrea Mrozek 1 Comment

Yesterday I posted about the new Danish study showing that abortion does not cause mental health problems. Today, Dr. Priscilla Coleman, a reputable psychologist who has been engaged in this debate for years, comments. Worth reading the whole thing.

Filed Under: All Posts

Look at us!

January 28, 2011 by Brigitte Pellerin 2 Comments

ProWomanProLife is three years old today. Happy Birthday to us!

___________________

Andrea adds: Not to put a damper on the birthday celebration, but it is hard to uncork the champagne when your founding coincides with a reprehensible, sad and heavy moment in Canadian history, both for women and their unborn children. January 28 is the 23rd anniversary of the Morgentaler decision. However, onwards and upwards, there are more and more of us (by this I mean ProWomanProLife types, and pro-lifers in general) and we are all actively and gracefully (I hope) pushing toward an end to abortion in Canada. Maybe I’ll have a beer after work, after all. (I’m not sure three years warrants champagne. Or even a fine wine. But on many occassions I actually prefer beer. It’s the time spent in Germany…I’m officially digressing now. Happy Birthday ProWomanProLife! Thank you to our readers, and thank you to those who quietly and faithfully do their part in the struggle.)

Filed Under: All Posts

Sigh

January 28, 2011 by Brigitte Pellerin Leave a Comment

Re Andrea’s post from yesterday. Just heard on the radio something about a contest to kill coyotes that didn’t sit well with the authorities because it offers a prize for the best kill (here’s a news story about it, in case you’re curious). The news reader explained that you can’t benefit from killing an animal, even if it’s a pest.

Wish they had a rule like that for killing humans…

p.s. coyotes really are a pest.

________________________

Deborah adds: Tell that to the folks at the University of Victoria. Even the hippies there are okay with a rabbit cull.

Filed Under: All Posts

It’s an animal’s world

January 27, 2011 by Andrea Mrozek Leave a Comment

When your cause is animal rights, apparently all you have to do is mention displeasure and bingo-bango-bongo things change! (No more pigs killed for use in training medical students.) It’s that easy.

People? Not so much.

Filed Under: All Posts

Oh good. Another study to read

January 27, 2011 by Andrea Mrozek 1 Comment

We need a post about this latest study suggesting abortion doesn’t trigger mental illness. I, however, will not let the media tell me what to think about it. SO. I make you aware of this, while commiting to actually read the thing later.

It’s interesting that though the headlines basically allow the reader to think “no mental health problems after abortion” there are more mental health problems among those who have abortions than those who give birth. The headline comes of the fact that there was no increase in mental health problems after abortion–those who had mental health problems after had them before, where having a baby showed an increase in mental health issues:

Researchers compared the rate of mental health treatment among women before and after a first abortion. Within the first year after an abortion, 15 per 1,000 women needed psychiatric counseling — similar to the rate seeking help nine months before an abortion….While first-time mothers had a lower rate of mental problems overall, the proportion of those seeking help after giving birth was dramatically higher. About 7 per 1,000 women got mental health help within a year of giving birth compared with 4 per 1,000 women pre-delivery.

I reserve judgment. And if anyone feels like they have the time and the inclination and wants to send the study along in full, I’d welcome that!

________________________

Brigitte doesn’t have time to read the whole thing, so she’ll just talk through her hat: Seriously. You don’t see me talk about these things very much. Mostly because to me, the reason why abortion is wrong isn’t because it causes (or not) mental-health problems, or breast cancer, or a bad complexion. Abortion is wrong because it kills an innocent human being, often in a most distressfully casual manner.

So a study says having an abortion does not cause women to seek psychiatric help as much as giving birth to a baby does. So what? Of course giving birth to a baby (even a wanted baby) is stressful. Duh. Nobody ever suggested it was a stress-free picnic. Some women just have a touch of baby blues. Others have more serious problems. Most worry about being a good mom. And I’m willing to bet most moms occasionally feel that they’re not up to the job.

But there’s one thing the woman who gave birth to her baby will never feel: guilt at having taken her baby’s life. That’s got to count for something, even if scientists can’t measure it.

___________________

UPDATE: Read Dr. Priscilla Coleman’s assessment of the study, here. Dr. Coleman is a reputable psychologist who has worked on this topic for years.

Filed Under: All Posts

What kind of mother are you?

January 26, 2011 by Véronique Bergeron Leave a Comment

Since we all learn to parent from popular culture, I thought it important to spend a minute of introspection figuring if we are more like “Amy Chua” — of Tiger Mother fame — or “Betty Draper” — Mad Man Don Draper’s long suffering wife. (I’m still in season three so shush already!) 

Where are the positive parenting models asks  this piece from the Huffington Post. Well, I see plenty all around me. But I don’t spend my time in front of a TV screen. Maybe that’s why.

Filed Under: All Posts

Pro-abortion vs. pro-choice

January 26, 2011 by Andrea Mrozek 6 Comments

You can get in trouble for using the term “pro-abortion.” But in the gruesome story from Philadelphia, is there any other word?

But the grand jury found that Pennsylvania authorities knew what was happening at Gosnell’s abortion mill, yet deliberately looked the other way. In 1993, with the accession of a prochoice governor, the Pennsylvania Department of Health stopped inspecting abortion clinics. “Officials concluded that inspections would be ‘putting a barrier up to women’ seeking abortions,’’ the report says, and decided “to leave clinics to do as they pleased.’’

So great is the concern around “access” that standards get tossed aside. The tossing aside of standards happened recently in Quebec, too. Rebecca and I wrote about that, here.

Back to Philadelphia, though. When the goal is unethical (killing babies) is it any wonder that some doctors “cross the line”? From day one of choosing to work in a clinic, they already did.

__________________________

Brigitte adds: Words fail...

Filed Under: All Posts

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 230
  • 231
  • 232
  • 233
  • 234
  • …
  • 480
  • Next Page »

Follow Us

Facebooktwitterrssby feather

Notable Columns

  • A pro-woman budget wouldn't tell me how to live my life
  • Bad medicine
  • Birth control pills have side effects
  • Canada Summer Jobs debacle–Can Trudeau call abortion a right?
  • Celebrate these Jubilee jailbirds
  • China has laws against sex selection. But not Canada. Why?
  • Family love is not a contract
  • Freedom to discuss the “choice”
  • Gender quotas don't help business or women
  • Ghomeshi case a wake-up call
  • Hidden cost of choice
  • Life at the heart of the matter
  • Life issues and the media
  • Need for rational abortion debate
  • New face of the abortion debate
  • People vs. kidneys
  • PET-P press release
  • Pro-life work is making me sick
  • Prolife doesn't mean anti-woman
  • Settle down or "lean in"
  • Sex education is all about values
  • Thank you, Camille Paglia
  • The new face of feminism
  • Today’s law worth discussing
  • When debate is shut down in Canada’s highest places
  • Whither feminism?

Categories

  • All Posts
  • Assisted Suicide/Euthanasia
  • Charitable
  • Ethics
  • Featured Media
  • Featured Posts
  • Feminism
  • Free Expression
  • International
  • Motherhood
  • Other
  • Political
  • Pregnancy Care Centres
  • Reproductive Technologies

All Posts

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Copyright © 2026 · News Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in