Bristol Palin is now a spokesperson for abstinence through the Candie’s Foundation, you can read about that here. But that article led me to an ad they did before–which I thought was kinda funny.
[youtube:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bUL0sEr1Yfo]
Bristol Palin is now a spokesperson for abstinence through the Candie’s Foundation, you can read about that here. But that article led me to an ad they did before–which I thought was kinda funny.
[youtube:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bUL0sEr1Yfo]
A propos nothing in particular (except that reasonably intensive training is always de rigueur this time of year – gotta look good in those new shorts, don’t we): I just got this fabulous book, Women’s Strength Training Anatomy, which describes in almost overwhelming detail the way our bodies work and how we can best improve them. Yes, this means more sweating and groaning. But somehow static forward lunges feel better when you can visualize exactly how your gluteus maximus (that’s the one you’re sitting on) is improving. At any rate, that’s what I’ll be telling myself.
Whatever helps, right?
A couple of comments about this piece in the Globe.
First, I feel like this is as pro-life as that paper is going to get in the near future. Enjoy it.
Secondly, the comments are really interesting–mostly supportive, some angry because the father wanted his daughter to have the baby at all, some angry because he wanted her to have the baby and give it away, not keep it. Altogether, interesting.
Finally, my opinion: It’s hard for me to imagine that he as the father clearly knows what a baby is (and when life begins) and he clearly has a pretty good relationship with his daughter (they are talking, he is involved in her life) and yet she doesn’t appear to really value life.
But perhaps it’s credit to having a good relationship with her that he was able to coax her away from abortion. (Does the daughter sound somewhat flippant about the whole thing to you? “I’m not keeping it.” “Ok, I will.”) But it’s all about the baby steps (so to speak, no pun intended).
In the balance, nice piece, I say.
New, in North Carolina, a sex hotline for teens. An impersonal, faceless text line so confused kids can get–no answers and a total lack of respect and love:
The texted question: “If I was raped when I was little and just had sex was it technically my first time when I was raped or when I recently had sex?” He wrote three drafts. An hour later, he texted back: “Your first time is whatever you make it. There is no ‘right’ answer: I believe your first time can be many things (good, bad, fun, embarrassing, wonderful) but it should never be non-consensual. Your first time is the first time you choose to have sex, not when some horrible person forces you.”
More from the same article:
Some [questions] reveal dangerous chasms of ignorance. “If ur partner has aids,” one teenager asks, “and u have sex without a condom do u get aids the first time or not?”
You know where there’s a dangerous chasm of ignorance? With the “adults” who started this thing up.
_______________________
Brigitte shakes her head in disbelief: To have so much sex ed and know so little… It would be funny if it weren’t so sad.
Katyn, a movie about the Soviet massacre of Polish officers in WWII, is coming out in European cinemas this summer, it seems. Hopefully it comes to Canada too.
The Soviet Union was certainly evil and one its worst moments was Katyn, the massacre of 12,000 Polish officers, policemen and intellectuals in April 1940. The Nazis discovered the bodies in 1943 but for some reason no one believed them when they said they hadn’t done it this time. Our Russians maintained this lie and the West went along with it, as we went along with Stalin’s vicious colonisation of our ally. The massacre, and the subsequent battle for the truth, is the subject of an overwhelming new Polish film, Katyn.
Sometimes people ask me what the link to abortion is in particular posts. I always highlight there need not be one. (We started this thing with the notion that we would blog about whatever struck our fancy.)
So. Blogging about this strikes my fancy for reasons of my interests in history and my family history too. However, it also pertains to a theme that comes up often enough on this blog: that we live in a world where certain truths are ignored, and people go to great lengths to look away.
_________________________
Rebecca adds: “However, it also pertains to a theme that comes up often enough on this blog: that we live in a world where certain truths are ignored, and people go to great lengths to look away.” … and also that we are all too willing to believe a lie, and to avoid examining it closely, when it confirms our assumptions and worldview. An alliance with the USSR to stop Germany was in my opinion necessary; had the Germans been able to dedicate all their resources to Jew-killing and conquering western Europe, they might well have succeeded, and the military accomplishments, personal and collective, of the Soviets on the eastern front are not nearly as well known as they ought to be. The fact that the USSR was a necessary ally at that point, though, does not excuse us from criticizing their tremendous shortcomings at the time, and still less from turning a blind eye to the horrors committed by the Soviets and their fellow travellers then and now.
Here’s a nice story for you, Andrea.
I wonder if we could reverse his idea and sing songs in order to sell t-shirts?
I’m working on a few American history projects and just saw this 1956 video about futuristic designs. I just loooove their automated kitchen and push-button magic. Warning: Extremely cheesy. Viewer discretion is advised.

Like Andrea, I have rather a lot of work to do these days, which explains the light blogging. Unfortunately that means I will also have to miss the Tulip Festival’s opening weekend, where people evidently walk around with flowers in their hair and funny sunglasses. But hey. I will endeavour to take advantage of the sunshine this weekend to plant a few new flowers around the house and see how long they last this year (I am a professional non-gardener, but I’m trying, I’m trying).
Good. There is absolutely nothing controversial about this ad. People who can’t cope with the legal reality in Canada (we allow abortion at any time in a pregnancy at the woman’s sole discretion) really shouldn’t work on getting bus ads taken down. They should work on changing that terrible reality.
On a different note, blogging may be light today and the next couple of days. I know I have a big, mammoth, scary deadline. And speaking of Malkin and threatening death–and whether that is funny or not–if someone were to do away with me right now, that would be a really good excuse for not finishing this project. I’m just saying. “I got tired and couldn’t keep going” = not a good excuse. “Someone shot me, and I’m recovering in hospital” = most excellent excuse. (I’m not asking for trouble, by the way. Just stating the facts about stressful deadlines and good excuses.)
The beauty of being a woman who is pro-life is that it is fairly easy to annoy my opponents simply by showing up. I don’t need to say all that much, when combatting the anachronistic notion that “abortion is a woman’s right.” I simply need to stand there (with shoes on, outside the kitchen!) and ask–hey, why is that self-evident? Because I don’t get it. And I don’t believe it. And by the way–that’s your opinion, not a fact.
Still, this little YouTube snippet reminds all of us not to shut up–whether you call yourself a conservative or a liberal is of no matter–most of our readers are here because they are pro-life. And my strategy on the life issue is two-fold, designed by prominent activist/communications gurus after much research and study. Ready?
One: To show up.
Two: To not shut up.
Brilliant, non? Enjoy.
[youtube:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lWHgUE9AD4s]