ProWomanProLife

  • The Story
  • The Women
  • Notable Columns
  • Contact Us
You are here: Home / All Posts / Dads are, like, so 2005

Dads are, like, so 2005

April 5, 2009 by Andrea Mrozek 5 Comments

I’m trying to think when Dads went out of style:

Iron Chef Cat Cora is cookin’ up a baby — and so is her wife Jennifer! Both expecting boys, Jennifer, 37, will deliver in April, while Cat, 41, is due in July. The couple’s new sons are from the same sperm donor as their older boys, Caje, 23 months and Zoran, 5. Zoran and the baby Cat is carrying are from Jennifer’s eggs, while Caje is from Cat’s. In Jennifer’s current pregnancy, both women’s embryos were transferred, so the biological mother is unknown. The couple do not to plan to conduct DNA testing to determine this. “[Jennifer] carried my embryo and I carried hers,” Cat explains. “It’s like surrogating, but obviously all of our kids are equal. “It’s really crazy! We decided that having them a year apart is harder than having kids as infants together.”

The good news is that in spite of dads being out, apparently babies are still in. No word yet on what’s going to happen to those huge 70s sunglasses people are wearing.

________________________

Tanya wonders: So when these kids are finally old enough to understand how babies are made (which, I’m thinking in this case will take way longer than the average bear) and want to know who their biological mother REALLY is… will the “mothers” cave and do DNA testing? Or will they insist beyond all reason that it’s really not important?

________________________

Brigitte says: I’m so glad the needs of the children always come first!

________________________

Rebecca adds: Call me a cynic, but I’m wondering how spectacularly ugly and complicated the (highly probable) custody suit will be.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmailby feather

Filed Under: All Posts Tagged With: In Style

Comments

  1. Suzanne A. says

    April 5, 2009 at 9:07 am

    So, no need for dads when you have sperm donors. A short while ago Dr. Phil had Nadya Suleman (aka “Octomom”) on the show. She was fielding questions from the audience when someone asked about the rights and responsibilities of the father of all the children. Dr. Phil jumped in and stated that this man was only the “sperm donor” and not the “father”. There we have it. I always thought that the act of sperm donation, whether naturally through intercourse, or artificially through IVF made a man a father. Guess I was wrong.

    Reply
  2. Marauder says

    April 5, 2009 at 10:40 am

    Caje and ZORAN? Oh God…

    I have a whole range of feelings on gay couples having kids. On the one hand, I do think a lot of different types of people can be good parents, but on the other hand, fatherlessness never seems to turn out spectacularly for anyone (though I don’t know if anyone’s come up with statistics about motherlessness). On the whole I wish gay people who wanted kids would adopt them. Then again, there are places where gay people can’t adopt kids…

    Either way, I think Cat and Jennifer’s whole deal with switching embryos and no DNA tests is going to lead to problems down the road.

    Reply
  3. El says

    April 5, 2009 at 1:35 pm

    I’m not sure how homosexuals adopting is any better than having biological children. One could argue that that is even more unfair on the kids. One huge issue to deal with is enough, isn’t it?

    I’m not real big on sperm or egg “donation” (isn’t it really, in most cases, a sale?), whether the recipient is heterosexual or homosexual. There’s something distasteful about selling human reproductive material – which is essentially selling one’s own offspring since that is what the sperm or egg will become. I think this is the bigger issue here when considering the needs of the children.

    Here is an interesting blog by a woman conceived through anonymous sperm “donation”:

    http://childofastranger.blogspot.com/

    Reply
  4. BillyHW says

    April 5, 2009 at 1:58 pm

    And some people don’t believe in the death penalty…

    Reply
  5. Marauder says

    April 6, 2009 at 8:24 am

    “I’m not sure how homosexuals adopting is any better than having biological children.”

    Gay people adopting kids = one parentless kid, already born, who now has a mom or a dad though not both. Gay people having biological kids instead of adopting a kid = two kids who don’t have both a mom and a dad, the biological kid and the kid who could have been adopted.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow Us

Facebooktwitterrssby feather

Notable Columns

  • A pro-woman budget wouldn't tell me how to live my life
  • Bad medicine
  • Birth control pills have side effects
  • Canada Summer Jobs debacle–Can Trudeau call abortion a right?
  • Celebrate these Jubilee jailbirds
  • China has laws against sex selection. But not Canada. Why?
  • Family love is not a contract
  • Freedom to discuss the “choice”
  • Gender quotas don't help business or women
  • Ghomeshi case a wake-up call
  • Hidden cost of choice
  • Life at the heart of the matter
  • Life issues and the media
  • Need for rational abortion debate
  • New face of the abortion debate
  • People vs. kidneys
  • PET-P press release
  • Pro-life work is making me sick
  • Prolife doesn't mean anti-woman
  • Settle down or "lean in"
  • Sex education is all about values
  • Thank you, Camille Paglia
  • The new face of feminism
  • Today’s law worth discussing
  • When debate is shut down in Canada’s highest places
  • Whither feminism?

Categories

  • All Posts
  • Assisted Suicide/Euthanasia
  • Charitable
  • Ethics
  • Featured Media
  • Featured Posts
  • Feminism
  • Free Expression
  • International
  • Motherhood
  • Other
  • Political
  • Pregnancy Care Centres
  • Reproductive Technologies

All Posts

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Copyright © 2023 · News Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in