ProWomanProLife

  • The Story
  • The Women
  • Notable Columns
  • Contact Us
You are here: Home / All Posts / I’m stumped

I’m stumped

April 24, 2009 by Brigitte Pellerin 6 Comments

I need help. I really don’t know what to think of this story. Part of me says it’s creepy, part of me says it’s sweet. Either way, I feel very sorry for this poor woman (and the countless ones in her situation).

A California man has signed papers to symbolically “adopt” and give his last name to his wife’s two aborted fetuses.

Stan Musil said he filed the posthumous “adoption” on Monday as a way to support his wife, Lisa, and help her heal from the pain of having those abortions, Lisa Musil told FOXNews.com.

_______________________

Andrea’s gut reaction: It’s weird, but what he is essentially saying to her is I accept you and your past. She is obviously still very much struggling with herself. In that sense, I don’t have a problem with it. That said, this information is not news; it belongs in a counsellor’s office.

_____________________

Rebecca adds: It’s creepy because it’s, well, a bit ghoulish – and I’d feel the same way about, say, getting a dead adult you were close to in life to “symbolically adopt” you. It’s sweet because this guy is willing to do something weird to bring his wife some peace. And it’s a wonderful story in that it makes it clear that abortion causes suffering and anguish for women, and it also makes it clear that these were babies that were aborted – nobody grieves over (to pick at random) a surgically removed kidney, much less asks her husband to symbolically adopt a destroyed kidney. The legions of counsellors telling women that most women just feel relief after an abortion – what would they say to Lisa Musil? How do they explain that? Are they willing to concede, in this case at least, that her two abortions ended two lives and caused profound suffering in another?

_____________________

Tanya adds: I think the motivation behind this act is what could potentially render it creepy or anything else.  In this case, however, I’m really touched by the couple’s actions.  In giving the children a full name, these are clearly being recognized as people.  The symbolic act of adoption by her husband is the closest these 4 people will ever be to a close family.  It’s not like the man can say, “hey, let’s have your boys over for a barbecue.”  He’s accepting his wife’ past.  He’s recognizing that she loves the children she aborted, and misses them.  He’s loving and missing them along with her.  He’s symbolically taking on the role he would have, were they still alive today.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmailby feather

Filed Under: All Posts

Comments

  1. Dane Richard says

    April 24, 2009 at 7:09 am

    I would say creepy. But that’s just me.

    Reply
  2. Julie Culshaw says

    April 24, 2009 at 10:36 am

    Yup, I find it creepy too, and agree that this belongs in a counsellor’s office.

    Reply
  3. Janette says

    April 24, 2009 at 11:24 am

    I agree that this belongs in a counselor’s office, but I do find this story sweet. I think it seems creepy because it’s a seemingly unnatural thing to do – adopt a dead baby? But abortion is unnatural, so it makes some sense that the healing process might be unnatural. Also, I find this story similar to recommended post-miscarriage healing techniques – naming your baby, buying a toy or outfit as a keepsake, writing a letter to your baby. Yes, this situation takes it to another level, but I can see the merit.

    Reply
  4. El says

    April 24, 2009 at 8:42 pm

    I find it more sweet than creepy, though it might go a bit far for a lot of people (I would think naming the babies would do, but I’m not them). I would imagine the wife was incredibly touched by that gesture after so many years of struggling with grief. Pushing abortion as a way to solve one’s problems is creepy. This is harmless at worst.

    Reply
  5. SUZANNE says

    April 26, 2009 at 3:10 pm

    I don’t get how people can find it creepy.

    The living and the dead are not separate. We will be re-united with all who have past.

    Reply
  6. Lisa says

    May 27, 2009 at 4:06 pm

    Hello all! I just happened to fall upon your correspondence with one another. I love what you all had to say, and may I say, I’m the Lisa Musil in the story. Most of what each of you said was so sweet and truly brought a tear to my eyes.

    Tanya: “In giving the children a full name, these are clearly being recognized as people.” That is exactly what I wanted to do is to show the world that our babies are people. Not a blob of tissue.

    This was just the most loving action that my husband could have made. And Tanya I also loved: “It’s not like the man can say, “hey, let’s have your boys over for a barbecue.” He’s accepting his wife’ past. He’s recognizing that she loves the children she aborted, and misses them. He’s loving and missing them along with her. He’s symbolically taking on the role he would have, were they still alive today.” That is so beautiful and that is exactly how he made me feel.

    When he talked, the first time, about OUR children, it was the first time I’ve ever heard that. You see – I cannot have children today. So to have my wonderful husband acknowledge my children as our children just brought a new level of love in our marriage.

    I’m glad that you each found the level of honor and respect that this now gives to the unborn. I didn’t itend for this to sound ‘creepy’ or anything. 🙂 It was a wonderful act of love from a husband to his barren wife.

    And lastly – the Counselor that healed me … His name is Jesus Christ so I truly have been counseled and healed in the best way!

    Thanks all!

    Reply

Leave a Reply to SUZANNE Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow Us

Facebooktwitterrssby feather

Notable Columns

  • A pro-woman budget wouldn't tell me how to live my life
  • Bad medicine
  • Birth control pills have side effects
  • Canada Summer Jobs debacle–Can Trudeau call abortion a right?
  • Celebrate these Jubilee jailbirds
  • China has laws against sex selection. But not Canada. Why?
  • Family love is not a contract
  • Freedom to discuss the “choice”
  • Gender quotas don't help business or women
  • Ghomeshi case a wake-up call
  • Hidden cost of choice
  • Life at the heart of the matter
  • Life issues and the media
  • Need for rational abortion debate
  • New face of the abortion debate
  • People vs. kidneys
  • PET-P press release
  • Pro-life work is making me sick
  • Prolife doesn't mean anti-woman
  • Settle down or "lean in"
  • Sex education is all about values
  • Thank you, Camille Paglia
  • The new face of feminism
  • Today’s law worth discussing
  • When debate is shut down in Canada’s highest places
  • Whither feminism?

Categories

  • All Posts
  • Assisted Suicide/Euthanasia
  • Charitable
  • Ethics
  • Featured Media
  • Featured Posts
  • Feminism
  • Free Expression
  • International
  • Motherhood
  • Other
  • Political
  • Pregnancy Care Centres
  • Reproductive Technologies

All Posts

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Copyright © 2026 · News Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in