ProWomanProLife

  • The Story
  • The Women
  • Notable Columns
  • Contact Us
You are here: Home / All Posts / Let’s confuse the men

Let’s confuse the men

February 7, 2009 by Tanya Zaleski 4 Comments

cheerios

This is what happens when feminism goes too far. Men become outraged by one of my favorite cereal commercials. (I do prefer this commercial with the British accents, but I digress…)

I believe in the strength of women. I believe we are capable of more than we know. But when we start claiming we can do anything men can do, men start questioning why we don’t have snow globes thrown at our crotch more often.

Now, “if women are the weaker sex, she shouldn’t be secretary of state. She shouldn’t run for president. She should stay home to bake cookies.”  Okay, so O’Reily’s guest is not the most articulate man, and there’s a whole lot that’s offensive to women infused into this one statement. But he’s a great exmple of the monster over-the-top feminism has helped create.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmailby feather

Filed Under: All Posts

Comments

  1. Christy Knockleby says

    February 7, 2009 at 3:09 pm

    Interesting clip.

    I thought that O’Reily was the one looking silly and inarticulate, not his guest. I think his guest has a point, not necessarily about that particular commercial, but about television in general portraying men as dumb.

    That said, that commercial, I think, makes the woman look just as silly.

    I’m not sure I know enough about feminism to understand how feminism gone to far leads to this. Is feminism responsible for men being portrayed as dumb on television? Or is it responsible for men being offended by men being portrayed as dumb? Or… where’s the connection?

    Reply
  2. Julie Culshaw says

    February 7, 2009 at 7:52 pm

    Yes, I agree with O’Reilly’s guest that men are being dumbed-down all over the place by women and I have to agree that results in a bunch of emasculated men, whom women do not want to marry.
    I do think that feminism has had a lot to do with this, but also men have become victims of it, and they should resist. Women do appreciate strong masculine men, and they don’t have to be macho to be that,. Julie

    Reply
  3. Bob Devine says

    February 9, 2009 at 3:34 am

    To many guys with thin skin out there. I saw the adds and thought they were funny. Why do people have to annualize everything to death? Relax, smell the roses, enjoy life, its tough enough by itself without looking for more stuff to fret about.

    Reply
  4. Matthew N says

    February 9, 2009 at 5:56 pm

    I think that guy is over-reacting. I could conceive of myself acting like this if I made some insinuation my wife was doing something about her weight and then was trying to dodge the question of whether I thought she was fat. I think the Cheerios ad is just playing off of that dance.

    Don’t make excuses for men who overreact. There’s really nothing of equivalent comedy value for women compared to a guy getting bean-bagged by a snowglobe. Are we going to say that the Three Stooges was an attack on masculinity because there wasn’t a corresponding female troupe? I’ll agree to the extent that feminism has occasionally inspired a paranoia of a latent anti-masculinity sentiment motivating the movement, but we shouldn’t be appealing to victimization in such trivial cases.

    What I find personally offensive is a tendency in some TV shows where a preponderance of cases treat a man’s claim of faithfulness to his wife as unworthy of trust and to show it to be a lie each time. I find it particularly offensive this notion that my word isn’t to be trusted because I am a man. However, I think it’s mostly men who are largely to blame for this image, not feminists. If men want to get rid of these bad images, they have to earn that trust back again.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow Us

Facebooktwitterrssby feather

Notable Columns

  • A pro-woman budget wouldn't tell me how to live my life
  • Bad medicine
  • Birth control pills have side effects
  • Canada Summer Jobs debacle–Can Trudeau call abortion a right?
  • Celebrate these Jubilee jailbirds
  • China has laws against sex selection. But not Canada. Why?
  • Family love is not a contract
  • Freedom to discuss the “choice”
  • Gender quotas don't help business or women
  • Ghomeshi case a wake-up call
  • Hidden cost of choice
  • Life at the heart of the matter
  • Life issues and the media
  • Need for rational abortion debate
  • New face of the abortion debate
  • People vs. kidneys
  • PET-P press release
  • Pro-life work is making me sick
  • Prolife doesn't mean anti-woman
  • Settle down or "lean in"
  • Sex education is all about values
  • Thank you, Camille Paglia
  • The new face of feminism
  • Today’s law worth discussing
  • When debate is shut down in Canada’s highest places
  • Whither feminism?

Categories

  • All Posts
  • Assisted Suicide/Euthanasia
  • Charitable
  • Ethics
  • Featured Media
  • Featured Posts
  • Feminism
  • Free Expression
  • International
  • Motherhood
  • Other
  • Political
  • Pregnancy Care Centres
  • Reproductive Technologies

All Posts

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Copyright © 2025 · News Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in