ProWomanProLife

  • The Story
  • The Women
  • Notable Columns
  • Contact Us
You are here: Home / All Posts / More from St. Joseph’s

More from St. Joseph’s

February 26, 2009 by Andrea Mrozek 2 Comments

The discussion continues over at this post . Thank you again to one and all for your thoughtful comments.

Today I’m drawing attention to this.

[The mother] explained to London Bishop Ronald Fabbro in a chance meeting on January 20, 2009 that she was pressured to terminate her pregnancy by 5 doctors at the Catholic hospital and by the hospital ethicist Fr. Michael Prieur, despite the fact that neither her life nor health were in danger.

More commentary from me to follow on the weekend.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmailby feather

Filed Under: All Posts Tagged With: forced abortion, inductions, St. Josephs

Comments

  1. rene says

    February 26, 2009 at 1:30 pm

    Worth listening to this

    Palliative Care in Perinatal Medicine as an Alternative Hope to Eugenic Abortion.
    Dr. Sylvie de Kermadec
    Scientific Committee, Lejeune Foundation, Paris, France
    MaterCare International’s 7th International Conference for Catholic and Other Christian/Pro-Life Obstetricians and Gynaecologists
    Nov 2008

    http://www.fertilitycare.net/matercare/PalliativeCareinPerinatalMedicineasanAlternativeHopetoEugenicAbortion.mp3

    Reply
  2. Barb says

    February 26, 2009 at 1:53 pm

    Thank you Andrea for not dropping this very important topic. Thank you for your humility and admitting that you might have got it wrong.

    It is certain that this subtle but very clear sign of eugenics can easily be confused with compassion. I know that Fr. Prieur means well, and is looking at the situation as trying to reflect the sanctity of life for infants who might otherwise have their lives terminated in a brutal fashion through dismemberment.

    In the same way, it is easy to deny a child born with disabilities from life saving treatment on the basis of compassion. (Who would want to be disabled like that?)

    As you reflect on your response, I ask that you please consider the following.

    1. Medical publication by leading American MD/EThicists, entitled Lethal Language, Lethal decisions.
    http://livingwithtrisomy13.org/Koogleretal.pdf

    2. Videos that show the possibilities for these innocent lives. Whether they live for minutes, days or years. They are beautiful and not without incredible value.

    Trisomy 13 lived 35 minutes
    http://www.kansascity.com/static/media/Audio_Photo_Gallery/

    Trisomy 18 lived 99 days. (Shown on Oprah a few weeks ago)
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=th6Njr-qkq0

    Trisomy 18 lived 4.5 years
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q6kf6JJnhFg

    3. The fact is that these babies prevent in a vast range of manifestations. By giving them a genetic label with associated prognosis and treatment plan (termination before birth or palliative after birth) we deny them their unique individuality. It is pure discrimination to treat the label and not the child.

    In this video, the dad of a 7 year old beautiful child with Trisomy 13 describes how the Director of the NICU tried to discreetly withdraw life saving necessities from his newborn so that she would die. He eventually obtained the surgery that she needed after an incredible battle. The video was taken at a conference at Univ of Alberta about eugenics.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UNzJt8fbavo&feature=related

    4. Of course, you know the tragic story of my daughter Annie who was left to suffocate to death over the course of weeks. The doctors told us they would diagnose “later, if symptoms worsen”. To this day, we don’t know how she died or whether she could be helped. We also don’t know where the lethal quantities of narcotics signed out for her or the final medication report went to.

    The coroner and his committee declared that the care was not appropriate and the hospital apologized for communication.

    http://www.anniefarlow.com

    Barb

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow Us

Facebooktwitterrssby feather

Notable Columns

  • A pro-woman budget wouldn't tell me how to live my life
  • Bad medicine
  • Birth control pills have side effects
  • Canada Summer Jobs debacle–Can Trudeau call abortion a right?
  • Celebrate these Jubilee jailbirds
  • China has laws against sex selection. But not Canada. Why?
  • Family love is not a contract
  • Freedom to discuss the “choice”
  • Gender quotas don't help business or women
  • Ghomeshi case a wake-up call
  • Hidden cost of choice
  • Life at the heart of the matter
  • Life issues and the media
  • Need for rational abortion debate
  • New face of the abortion debate
  • People vs. kidneys
  • PET-P press release
  • Pro-life work is making me sick
  • Prolife doesn't mean anti-woman
  • Settle down or "lean in"
  • Sex education is all about values
  • Thank you, Camille Paglia
  • The new face of feminism
  • Today’s law worth discussing
  • When debate is shut down in Canada’s highest places
  • Whither feminism?

Categories

  • All Posts
  • Assisted Suicide/Euthanasia
  • Charitable
  • Ethics
  • Featured Media
  • Featured Posts
  • Feminism
  • Free Expression
  • International
  • Motherhood
  • Other
  • Political
  • Pregnancy Care Centres
  • Reproductive Technologies

All Posts

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Copyright © 2025 · News Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in