ProWomanProLife

  • The Story
  • The Women
  • Notable Columns
  • Contact Us
You are here: Home / All Posts / Not in my name

Not in my name

April 30, 2010 by Andrea Mrozek 153 Comments

Welcome, Judith Timson! Welcome to my world. For years and years the government has funded abortions, supplied abortions, paid for them (since I started paying taxes) with my money. It wasn’t done in my name. And frankly, I don’t love the blood on my hands. In fact, this group was started so that women like you wouldn’t be the only ones to stand up at the time of the Morgentaler anniversary, to make a claim of “victory for women’s rights” as if you spoke for women everywhere. See, here’s the problem. You and your friends have been purportedly “representing” me in politics and the public square for quite some time. But you never did. It was frustrating, yes. So when you write this:

Here is a political question that for me, just won’t go away: In exactly whose name has the Harper government decided to withhold funds for access to safe abortion in their international maternal and child health initiative? Not in my name. And not in the names of countless Canadians who have relied for years on safe access to the procedure at government expense.

…I say, how do you like them apples?

Certainly, I’m glad you have a column, Judith, and can express yourself. You’re welcome to that. The point of this post is simply to highlight that for my entire life a pro-abortion status quo has been forced on me, pushing me to agree to some sort of “women’s right” that doesn’t exist.

Not in my name. Not in my name.

________________________

Brigitte adds: Not in my name.

________________________

Tanya adds: No, not in my name, either.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmailby feather

Filed Under: All Posts

Comments

  1. fern hill says

    May 1, 2010 at 6:30 am

    Polls, polls, polls. All show that Canadians are pro-choice.

    http://www.religioustolerance.org/abopollca.htm

    http://www.lifenews.com/int803.html

    http://www.ekospolitics.com/index.php/2010/04/canadians-decisively-pro-choice-on-abortion-april-1-2010/

    Hey, Andrea — I’m curious. Check your stats. Do any of your commenters click on outside links? Or is this the echo chamber that it appears to be?

    And now I’ve got a message that my comment seems ‘spammy’. Too many links? Let’s see.

    Reply
    • Brigitte Pellerin says

      May 1, 2010 at 6:43 am

      Fern: Yes, too many links. The system flags after two.

      Reply
  2. fern hill says

    May 1, 2010 at 6:31 am

    That’s interesting. Four links were ‘spammy’. Three links and my comment has been sent to the editor and may or may not be published.

    Reply
  3. Andrea Mrozek says

    May 1, 2010 at 8:11 am

    I’d hate to lose the point here which was that the Judith Timsons of the world are funny when they wake up one day and think “wait a second, that doesn’t represent me!” and become all indignant.

    Almost every time I speak in a public place I make the point that I do not speak for every woman. Rather that I speak for those who agree. And of course, I speak with some hopes of bringing others alongside, as I was brought alongside by some other charming and intelligent pro-lifers…

    This post is not about “minority/majority” or “morality/immorality” or even “right/wrong”.

    It’s about asking a simple question: Could those who religiously believe abortion is a woman’s right stop saying they speak on behalf of all women? Because they don’t.

    The Not in My Name Campaign. Catchy.

    Reply
  4. Rosa says

    May 1, 2010 at 8:14 am

    I am a Canadian citizen living in Hong Kong. Unfortunately I am still paying taxes in Canada and funding abortions. My main beef about this is that there are loose living guys who are abusing women. They have sex with women and promise them … but when the woman gets pregnant, they simply dump her for another. I don’t think that this is fair to anyone, nor should Canadian taxpayers have to be involved with terminating the lives of innocent human beings and enabling men to use women sexually one after another for as many women as they can con. I wish that we could stop this.

    Reply
  5. Theresa says

    May 1, 2010 at 9:21 am

    Not in my name.

    Reply
  6. Melissa says

    May 1, 2010 at 11:11 am

    I’m late coming to this, but the pro-choicers definitely do not speak for me!

    Reply
  7. Monica says

    May 1, 2010 at 12:51 pm

    Definitely not in my name.

    Reply
  8. Kerry Kronberg says

    May 1, 2010 at 1:35 pm

    Not in my name, either!

    Reply
  9. Lise says

    May 1, 2010 at 3:00 pm

    Not in my name either. By forcing Canadians to fund abortion, the government forces us to go against our very nature, everything we believe in, all that makes life good, beautiful and worth living. The horror of this coercion cannot be exaggerated.

    Reply
  10. Harold says

    May 1, 2010 at 5:04 pm

    Not in my name,either

    Reply
  11. Irma says

    May 1, 2010 at 6:04 pm

    Not in my name! I’ll be at the March for Life next week. D.V.

    Reply
  12. Monique says

    May 1, 2010 at 6:33 pm

    Not in my name. I don’t think that having a baby ( which required a previous personnal choice of having sex ) is like having a tumor which will need a medical intervention. Our taxes should support Health Care for all canadians. Let people who support abortion fund it out of their own pocket like any other non profit charity.

    Reply
  13. Jean says

    May 1, 2010 at 7:04 pm

    Not in my name.

    Reply
  14. mary says

    May 1, 2010 at 8:12 pm

    Not in my nor my husband’s name either.

    Reply
  15. Alex Lau says

    May 1, 2010 at 8:35 pm

    Not in my name, either.

    Reply
  16. Marie says

    May 1, 2010 at 9:07 pm

    Not in my name.

    However, I am not rooting for our Professional Feminists to wake up to the reality that they don’t speak in anyone’s name but their own, because it’s their arrogance that will be their undoing.

    The more foolish and unreasonable they become in their attempts to silence all dissent, while simultaneously trumpeting that no dissent exists, the more they will be seen for what they are – self-loathing ideologues completely out of touch with reality.

    Take our disingenuous friend Fern – still using that wildly successful newspeak term “pro-choice” in an attempt to lay claim to the country. Sure, when asked to describe themselves using undefined terms, a slim majority choose to say they are “pro-choice” – at least slightly. Of course, 92% of Canadians don’t even know what the “pro-choice” code word really means – that abortion MUST be permitted at any time from conception up to the moment of birth (thanks for the links, babe).

    That’s why they work so hard to silence anyone who dares to disagree with them in the slightest, why they are so driven to cultivate the appearance that they speak for all women. If Canadians were actually allowed to have a national conversation about abortion, the truth might accidentally come out.

    So I say let them throw their little tantrums when anyone dares publicly question the status quo – it creates an opportunity for a little bit more of that conversation to happen, and a little more of that truth to shine through.

    Reply
  17. Andrea Mrozek says

    May 1, 2010 at 10:10 pm

    “it’s their arrogance that will be their undoing”–BINGO. Agreed. Thanks, Marie.

    Reply
  18. DC says

    May 2, 2010 at 1:14 am

    Not in my name either and I agree with Marie. Most Canadians are horrified with the number of killings on their soil in the name of “freedom for women”
    Murder is not freedom and women have been conned by the package they have been sold called freedom..what a lie it is

    When these feminists wake up..they will weep
    A real feminist believes in life, not death.
    A real feminist believes in the power of her own womb and for her sisters womb

    Reply
  19. Tina says

    May 2, 2010 at 11:10 am

    4 in my house and NOT IN OUR NAME EITHER!

    Reply
  20. Hanson LAU says

    May 2, 2010 at 5:48 pm

    NOT IN MY NAME EITHER AND MY WIFE AGREES WITH ME THIS TIME

    Reply
  21. Heather Murray says

    May 2, 2010 at 8:42 pm

    Not in my name!!

    Reply
  22. Jeanne says

    May 2, 2010 at 8:44 pm

    A “Not in My Name” campaign would be great Andrea. Sounds like a perfect slogan. I do like the irony of the pro-choice woman who suddenly finds herself in our position. Ha ha.

    I’m educated, and still, NOT IN MY NAME. My father has a doctor’s degree, my brother is working on his. NOT IN THEIR NAMES EITHER. My family physician (obviously educated) is PRO-LIFE. NOT IN HIS NAME EITHER.

    Thanks to EDUCATION I know that foetuses suffer HORRIBLE pain during an abortion. Thanks to mothers who have suffered abortions, I know that they felt their babies moving in their womb, trying to escape. These women, who thought they had no other choice, have to deal with this for the rest of their lives. NOT IN MY NAME.

    Reply
  23. Maura says

    May 2, 2010 at 9:35 pm

    Not in my name either – not for ANYONe in my household of 7.

    Reply
  24. Chu Wing Wah says

    May 2, 2010 at 10:55 pm

    not in my name either

    Reply
  25. WENDY says

    May 2, 2010 at 11:41 pm

    Not in my name. Not for my husband either.

    Reply
  26. Ruthann A says

    May 3, 2010 at 6:31 am

    Not in my name.

    Reply
  27. Marya M says

    May 3, 2010 at 8:39 am

    Not in my name.

    Reply
  28. Nancy Winslow says

    May 3, 2010 at 9:18 am

    Our government has forced me to be a party to killing our precious unborn Canadian babies. Must we all stop paying taxes to make the point that we abhor this holocaust?

    Reply
  29. Tim says

    May 3, 2010 at 10:36 am

    Not in my name…

    Reply
  30. Mel says

    May 3, 2010 at 11:31 am

    50 years ago, when the now widely discredited “recapitulation theory” of human embryonic development was pervasive in our education and media institutions, one could understand why the public could be duped into accepting abortion as a reasonable choice.

    But not any more. Not with the knowledge we have today. Not with ultra-sound, laser technology and modern science. Today we know what and who the fetus is. It is NOT an appendage of the woman. It is NOT an inferior life form evolving into a human being. It is, in every sense — human life. And it is innocent of any crime. To casually kill any innocent human life is an unspeakable crime. For years I and my entire family have STRONGLY resented having to pay for this senseless and barbaric killing through our tax dollars. It is a travesty of justice and an imposition of tyranny!!!

    DEFINITELY NOT IN MY NAME!

    Reply
  31. Sarah says

    May 3, 2010 at 11:56 am

    Not in my name either…

    Reply
  32. Barb says

    May 3, 2010 at 12:37 pm

    Definitely NOT in MY name either!!

    Reply
  33. Kirsten says

    May 3, 2010 at 1:02 pm

    Definately not in my name!!

    Reply
  34. Heather White says

    May 3, 2010 at 1:04 pm

    Not in MY NAME EITHER!

    Reply
  35. Karen says

    May 3, 2010 at 2:03 pm

    Not in my name.

    Reply
  36. Sharon says

    May 3, 2010 at 3:48 pm

    Not in my name either!

    Reply
  37. Mae Pirc says

    May 3, 2010 at 6:53 pm

    Not in my name anymore!!

    Reply
  38. Ed & Anita Hardison says

    May 4, 2010 at 9:42 am

    not in our names either

    Reply
  39. Charles & Jackie says

    May 4, 2010 at 11:38 am

    Most definately NOT in our names or our 3 sons & 4 grandsons.

    Fern, one day you will have to answer to a higher power for your pro abortion views. Good luck.!!!

    Reply
  40. Barbara says

    May 5, 2010 at 10:25 am

    Definitely not in my name!

    Reply
  41. Barra says

    May 5, 2010 at 11:03 am

    Certainly not in my name!

    Reply
  42. Jojo Ruba says

    May 5, 2010 at 11:58 am

    Everyone,

    Judith Timson will be on a Globe and Mail discussion that is happening right now (11 am MST on May 5th):

    http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/ottawa-notebook/should-pms-critics-shut-up-about-maternal-health/article1557698/

    Reply
  43. Ann and Lloyd says

    May 5, 2010 at 2:01 pm

    Not in our name nor our six children and seventeen grandchildren

    Reply
  44. Pauline says

    May 5, 2010 at 8:54 pm

    Not in my name!!

    Reply
  45. Sharen Frewing says

    May 6, 2010 at 12:42 am

    Not in my name either! While I can sympathize with feeling overwhelmed by a pregnancy, killing the baby is never a solution. Abortion has changed the face and morals of our nation. A society is only as resilient as its treatment of its most vulnerable members – and who is more vulnerable than a child in the womb. For a woman to kill her own flesh and blood goes against the very core of her being, as women who have had abortions will attest.

    Feminism, in all its rabid forms has destroyed the family. I am not talking about equal pay for equal work here, but the attitude that women can have it all at the same time and others must not only accommodate that, but also pay for it. Children are left in daycares, ala the Soviet Union – a failed experiment. Men are robbed of their natural inclinations to provide and protect.

    Do not ever think that you speak for all woman, or that abortion is a “right”. No, life is a right, and you will never speak for me as our worldviews are dramatically different.

    Reply
  46. Hanam says

    May 6, 2010 at 9:49 am

    Thank you Sharen for your comment.
    I couldn’t agree more.

    Reply
  47. Mel says

    May 6, 2010 at 11:56 am

    The argument that educated people are more likely to support abortion is specious! It is sophistry at its worst….especially given the extent to which our institutions of higher education and media elite are locked into a rut of political correctness which stymies free thinking and imprisons the mind. Just look at the dreadful rise in anti-semitism on our campuses.

    But more importantly, the winds of academic fashion change constantly. Those who led and supported the Third Reich were among the most educated minds in the world at that time. They believed sincerely that they were doing what was scientific and logical according to their firm belief in evolution and the need for mankind to eliminate those with disabilities and those of inferior race. It was all sold as high science and academic superiority. But just like abortion, it was pure evil and served to cause untold suffering.

    Its time the truth about abortion is told. And we who regard it as morally repugnant should NEVER have to pay for it.

    Mel

    Reply
  48. Janet Jones says

    May 7, 2010 at 11:15 pm

    Not in my name!

    Reply
  49. Veronique says

    May 11, 2010 at 10:41 am

    5 in our household, not, not in our name either!

    Reply
  50. Julie Douglas says

    May 13, 2010 at 5:57 pm

    Not in my name, nor for anybody in this household!

    Reply
« Older Comments
Newer Comments »

Leave a Reply to Sharon Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow Us

Facebooktwitterrssby feather

Notable Columns

  • A pro-woman budget wouldn't tell me how to live my life
  • Bad medicine
  • Birth control pills have side effects
  • Canada Summer Jobs debacle–Can Trudeau call abortion a right?
  • Celebrate these Jubilee jailbirds
  • China has laws against sex selection. But not Canada. Why?
  • Family love is not a contract
  • Freedom to discuss the “choice”
  • Gender quotas don't help business or women
  • Ghomeshi case a wake-up call
  • Hidden cost of choice
  • Life at the heart of the matter
  • Life issues and the media
  • Need for rational abortion debate
  • New face of the abortion debate
  • People vs. kidneys
  • PET-P press release
  • Pro-life work is making me sick
  • Prolife doesn't mean anti-woman
  • Settle down or "lean in"
  • Sex education is all about values
  • Thank you, Camille Paglia
  • The new face of feminism
  • Today’s law worth discussing
  • When debate is shut down in Canada’s highest places
  • Whither feminism?

Categories

  • All Posts
  • Assisted Suicide/Euthanasia
  • Charitable
  • Ethics
  • Featured Media
  • Featured Posts
  • Feminism
  • Free Expression
  • International
  • Motherhood
  • Other
  • Political
  • Pregnancy Care Centres
  • Reproductive Technologies

All Posts

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Copyright © 2026 · News Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in