ProWomanProLife

  • The Story
  • The Women
  • Notable Columns
  • Contact Us
You are here: Home / All Posts / Now there’s a doctor I won’t be seeing

Now there’s a doctor I won’t be seeing

January 13, 2012 by Andrea Mrozek 4 Comments

In reading the other letter to the editor, I missed this one:

Re: It’s Primarily A Medical Matter, letter to the editor, Jan. 11.
Dr. Philip Ney states that there is “no scientific basis for abortion” — he couldn’t be further from the truth. Many years ago here in Ontario we introduced maternal serum screening, a blood test that allows us to screen for birth defects such as Down’s syndrome and Spina Bifida. If a test comes back positive, we offer the patient amniocentesis. If that also confirms the presence of either of these conditions, the patient is counselled on options — one of which is to terminate the pregnancy.
It is a difficult and anguishing decision for many patients to make — but it is a decision based on science, not whimsy.
Dr. Susan Piccinin, Ancaster, Ont.

Let those words sink in. To this doctor, taking the life of a Down’s child is a matter of science. As they say, science tells us what we can do, but it never tells us what we ought to do. And for this doctor to be so cold-hearted in the presence of disability makes me shudder.  At least she’s honest.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmailby feather

Filed Under: All Posts

Comments

  1. lwestin says

    January 13, 2012 at 12:43 pm

    ‘progressive’ with all its ‘tolerance’ hanging out

    Reply
  2. Melissa says

    January 13, 2012 at 11:12 pm

    Especially since Dr. Ney didn’t say that there was no scientific basis for abortion. Rather, said that a) “there is no medical necessity for abortions”, and b) [abortion is] “a medical procedure that provides the patient no scientifically established benefit”.

    Unless Dr. Piccinin seriously wants to contend that aborting a child with Down Syndrome is a scientifically-established benefit…

    Reply
  3. Squander Two says

    January 17, 2012 at 7:45 pm

    The screening itself carries a risk of miscarriage, so there’s simply no point even having the screening unless you’ve already decided to abort if the kid has Down’s. So offering the parents options AFTER the test comes back positive is dishonest. The whole “options” discussion should be taking place before the testing even starts.

    Reply
  4. Dr jibberjabber says

    March 18, 2020 at 4:09 am

    Everything she is saying makes perfect sense, if you had the option why would you want to bring something into this world which will be hindered and most likely come to an end shorter than others? Take your emotions out of the equation and think logical.

    Reply

Leave a Reply to Dr jibberjabber Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow Us

Facebooktwitterrssby feather

Notable Columns

  • A pro-woman budget wouldn't tell me how to live my life
  • Bad medicine
  • Birth control pills have side effects
  • Canada Summer Jobs debacle–Can Trudeau call abortion a right?
  • Celebrate these Jubilee jailbirds
  • China has laws against sex selection. But not Canada. Why?
  • Family love is not a contract
  • Freedom to discuss the “choice”
  • Gender quotas don't help business or women
  • Ghomeshi case a wake-up call
  • Hidden cost of choice
  • Life at the heart of the matter
  • Life issues and the media
  • Need for rational abortion debate
  • New face of the abortion debate
  • People vs. kidneys
  • PET-P press release
  • Pro-life work is making me sick
  • Prolife doesn't mean anti-woman
  • Settle down or "lean in"
  • Sex education is all about values
  • Thank you, Camille Paglia
  • The new face of feminism
  • Today’s law worth discussing
  • When debate is shut down in Canada’s highest places
  • Whither feminism?

Categories

  • All Posts
  • Assisted Suicide/Euthanasia
  • Charitable
  • Ethics
  • Featured Media
  • Featured Posts
  • Feminism
  • Free Expression
  • International
  • Motherhood
  • Other
  • Political
  • Pregnancy Care Centres
  • Reproductive Technologies

All Posts

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Copyright © 2026 · News Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in