Reproductive choice or environmentalism? How does a progressive mind choose between the two? Another news story about the effects of hormones on males:
Half the male fish in British lowland rivers have been found to be developing eggs in their testes; in some stretches all male roaches have been found to be changing sex in this way. Female hormones – largely from the contraceptive pills which pass unaltered through sewage treatment – are partly responsible, while more than three-quarters of sewage works have been found also to be discharging demasculinising man-made chemicals. Feminising effects have now been discovered in a host of freshwater fish species as far away as Japan and Benin, in Africa, and in sea fish in the North Sea, the Mediterranean, Osaka Bay in Japan and Puget Sound on the US west coast.
There are many bad things in the environment besides female hormones from contraceptive pills. If you read the whole story, you’ll find lots to be afraid of. But my question remains: If the choice is between continuing the use the Pill and demasculinizing fish, which one will we choose?
______________________________
Andrea corrects Brigitte: Oh dear, Brigitte, you should know this by now. “Women’s rights”, especially “women’s reproductive rights”, no matter how broadly or narrowly defined are THE trump card. Of course they win. The fish don’t stand a chance. (Unless this damages female fish too. In which case, this remains an open question. Hmmmm.)
______________________________
Rebecca is enlightened enough to realize there is no problem, since gender is a social construct: if the fish were secure in their own identity and not marginalized by a phallocentric hegemonistic culture, they would not mind feminising effects.
by 
Haha, Rebecaa’s answer is dead on! Did you leave out her degree in women’s studies from her biography?
Thanks so much for posting this. My husband and I practice NFP, and I feel very strongly that many secular people would be attracted to it on environmental grounds. There is increasing press coverage of the negative health and environmental consequences of polluting our bodies with industrial grade chemical hormones. I also believe that once secular people practice chastity in real life, they may come to see its value in their marriage and for the common good. The “green” movement might even end up saving some marriages!! I think it would be very effective to market NFP in this way.
But first and foremost, of course, we have got to get Catholics out of mortal sin and off of artificial contraception!! I love your blog and I pray that it will change hearts and minds.
Ummm… fish aren’t the only ones:
http://thespec.com/News/Local/article/479223
Oh my. This is very distressing! Jennifer’s comment was very well put. Their are many other forms of birth control besides the pill which is not only harmful to the environment, but I have heard nasty things about its effect on human bodies. As I have often said many things about the current Women’s movement is more detrimental to us than helpful.