byLONDON — Feeding solid food earlier and not relying solely on breastfeeding for the first six months might benefit babies, a team of researchers say in a new study.
Waiting to wean a baby could increase the occurrence of food allergies and iron deficiency, the BBC reported, citing the study in the British Medical Journal.
The researchers said weaning could begin as early as four months, instead of the current recommendation of six months adopted by many countries, the BBC report said.
The World Health Organization issued the six months guideline nearly a decade ago, and the research team said this recommendation should stand for mothers in developing nations, as access to clean water and appropriate baby food can be limited.
“When you look at the figures, there are a lot of babies being weaned before six months anyway – and that’s probably the most important thing in terms of hard evidence,” lead researcher Dr. Mary Fewtrell, of the University of London Institute of Child Health, was quoted as saying by the BBC.
SUZANNE says
People who are on the outside may not know this but…mothering issues like breastfeeding can be highly political and controversial.
Elizabeth says
Definitely, Suzanne. My baby is 9 mo. old, and we started introducing solids at 5 months, even though public health, etc. was saying 6 mo. I think she was ready earlier. The grandmothers thought it was tantamount to child abuse to wait until 6 months (apparently my husband had steak at 6 weeks old, lol!). But, neither of the grandmothers nursed either of us.
I think parents should see how your individual baby is doing. Ours is in the 99th percentile for weight and height and was watching us feed ourselves like a hawk, so we made the determination that she was ready.
Although technically starting solid foods is “weaning”, babies still get nursed as well. If you wean completely before 1 year, they need formula to supplement their diet.
Guggie Daly says
What’s up with this old, outdated, dismissed, single study being revived and dragged around once again?
It’s cycled through several mainstream outlets as if it is new research. It’s not.