ProWomanProLife

  • The Story
  • The Women
  • Notable Columns
  • Contact Us
You are here: Home / All Posts / Over the counter

Over the counter

August 28, 2010 by Jennifer Derwey 4 Comments

Why do women still need a prescription for the birth-control pill?

When I was 21, I went to my local walk-in clinic to get birth control. The experience began just like any other doctor’s visit. The nurse, wearing a blue plastic ring looped onto a string around her neck, asked me a few basic questions to start the process. She asked me when my last exam had been, I told her I had never had one. She then requested I come back to the clinic in a few weeks to have one. I did not have a pelvic exam during this appointment.

I expected her to explain birth control pills to me, but as she pulled on the blue ring with her index finger she told (sold) me about a product called NuvaRing (new on the market at that time). I looked around and saw a NuvaRing calendar hanging on the wall, a NuvaRing clipboard she was jotting notes on, and a NuvaRing clock hanging in the waiting room as I left the building. I left the clinic, with a 1 year prescription for NuvaRing in hand, a NuvaRing CD case (my free gift with purchase) and two packets of PlanB that the nurse told me to use after intercourse if I had any within the first two months of using my new prescription “Just in case.” She did not explain to me what PlanB was or what it did, it was simply described as a back-up birth control.

Today, I feel very ignorant of having not known what I was putting in my body, but I still believe a health care employee has a duty to explain these things before writing a prescription. This is why I am against over the counter birth control access, because even with so-called educated medical staff at our side, we’re still very much in the dark when it comes to contraception. I don’t want the responsibility of education to be left to pharmaceutical companies, because they might take the job even less seriously.

But the prospect of women gaining unfettered access to the pill has some doctors and sexual health counsellors uneasy. Would women still see their doctor for Pap smears? Could they safely screen themselves for contraindications – conditions under which the pill should not be used? Would it unleash a marketing bonanza for drug-makers and a huge increase in users?

Nevertheless, a Canadian leader in reproductive medicine and editor of the Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada says it seems wrong and paternalistic that, half a century after the pill’s debut in the U.S. and 41 years after coming to Canada, women still cannot get access to the most effective, self-administered birth control on the market without a doctor’s blessing.

Men aren’t required to have a testicular or prostate exam before using condoms, Dr. Tim Rowe has argued in the pages of his own journal.

Condoms, for better or for worse, aren’t chemical contraception. Men don’t gain weight, have mood swings or get blood clots from wearing a condom (regardless of what your boyfriend tells you). I wish the process of obtaining birth control, for myself, had been more in depth than it was.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmailby feather

Filed Under: All Posts

Comments

  1. Suricou Raven says

    August 28, 2010 at 5:59 pm

    Very active drug marketing is quite common in all areas of medicine now, not just contraception. Less so here in the UK than in the US, as we don’t allow direct-to-consumer advertising. I’m not sure of the situation in Canada. But either way, pharmacutical companies spend a lot of money convincing those who make the purchasing decisions of the need for their products.

    A hormonal contraceptive for males has been one of the holy grails of medicine for decades. It has so far proved undoable. The female reproductive system is a delicate interplay of hormones easily disrupted, but males prove far more durable against chemical interference. Conversely, their comparatively exposed anatomy makes surgical contraception much more practical.

    Reply
  2. Luke says

    August 28, 2010 at 11:46 pm

    Condoms aren’t Class 1 Carcinogens either, unlike the birth control pill (see IARC’s monograph from 2007 at http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Monographs/vol91/mono91-6E.pdf). Dr. Rowe’s logic is faulty on many fronts, and as a health care provider, it concerns me that others are trying to give these powerful medications out without supervision.

    Reply
  3. Briana says

    August 27, 2011 at 9:49 pm

    I had read in a book about the development of the birth control that when they were developing the birth control pill that it was originally developed for men and that it worked but caused a certain amount off “shrinkage” – if you get my meaning. And so they stopped there – we just couldn’t have that now could we?
    I looked into natural family planning and I started doing it and I can tell you my cycle down to the hour. I actually can tell you when I am releasing an egg (I did earlier this afternoon around 2). It is amazing that I know, and actually KNOW, how my body functions and can then control my fertility that way.

    Reply
  4. Jennifer Derwey says

    September 7, 2011 at 6:32 pm

    Briana thanks for your comment, it’s very encouraging. I’ve got my hold placed on a NFP book at the library (I guess all the women in Nova Scotia are fighting over the only 2 copies the library has!).

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow Us

Facebooktwitterrssby feather

Notable Columns

  • A pro-woman budget wouldn't tell me how to live my life
  • Bad medicine
  • Birth control pills have side effects
  • Canada Summer Jobs debacle–Can Trudeau call abortion a right?
  • Celebrate these Jubilee jailbirds
  • China has laws against sex selection. But not Canada. Why?
  • Family love is not a contract
  • Freedom to discuss the “choice”
  • Gender quotas don't help business or women
  • Ghomeshi case a wake-up call
  • Hidden cost of choice
  • Life at the heart of the matter
  • Life issues and the media
  • Need for rational abortion debate
  • New face of the abortion debate
  • People vs. kidneys
  • PET-P press release
  • Pro-life work is making me sick
  • Prolife doesn't mean anti-woman
  • Settle down or "lean in"
  • Sex education is all about values
  • Thank you, Camille Paglia
  • The new face of feminism
  • Today’s law worth discussing
  • When debate is shut down in Canada’s highest places
  • Whither feminism?

Categories

  • All Posts
  • Assisted Suicide/Euthanasia
  • Charitable
  • Ethics
  • Featured Media
  • Featured Posts
  • Feminism
  • Free Expression
  • International
  • Motherhood
  • Other
  • Political
  • Pregnancy Care Centres
  • Reproductive Technologies

All Posts

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Copyright © 2026 · News Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in