ProWomanProLife

  • The Story
  • The Women
  • Notable Columns
  • Contact Us
You are here: Home / All Posts / Possible autism detection and treatment in utero

Possible autism detection and treatment in utero

November 12, 2013 by Natalie Sonnen 3 Comments

It is always encouraging to be reminded of the good that can be done when we use our modern medical capabilities the right way.

Due to the rise in autism over the past few years, researcher Gary Steinman, MD, PhD, is attempting to do something about it.  He has found that depressed levels of a protein called insulin-like growth factor (IGF) could potentially serve as a biomarker that could anticipate autism occurrence, meaning that blood tests from new-borns can indicate whether these levels are low and hence whether the child has a propensity for autism.  He proposes that increasing levels of IGF can easily be done (mother’s or bovine milk) and will prevent the onset of this debilitating disease. He is suggesting that in future, we can test amniotic fluid for the same levels and supplement the baby in utero to prevent the onset of autism.

If future research were to confirm a connection between IGF and autism, Dr. Steinman recommends a new phase of research focused upon the detection of possibly depressed IGF levels in amniotic fluid during the second trimester of pregnancy. This might be followed by supplementation of the growth factor before symptoms of autism develop.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmailby feather

Filed Under: All Posts

Comments

  1. Melissa says

    November 12, 2013 at 9:03 pm

    I wonder if this IGF will become the new folic acid, recommended that all women of childbearing age supplement with it, in order to reduce problems with the babies. It is really nice to see the idea of prenatal testing correspond wih potential ways to reduce he effects of the disorder, rather than a reflexive offer of abortion.

    Reply
  2. SUZANNE says

    November 13, 2013 at 1:02 am

    My fear is that this could become a biomarker for abortion.

    Reply
  3. Faye Sonier says

    November 15, 2013 at 12:35 pm

    Yeah, that was my first thought too, Suzanne.

    Reply

Leave a Reply to Faye Sonier Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow Us

Facebooktwitterrssby feather

Notable Columns

  • A pro-woman budget wouldn't tell me how to live my life
  • Bad medicine
  • Birth control pills have side effects
  • Canada Summer Jobs debacle–Can Trudeau call abortion a right?
  • Celebrate these Jubilee jailbirds
  • China has laws against sex selection. But not Canada. Why?
  • Family love is not a contract
  • Freedom to discuss the “choice”
  • Gender quotas don't help business or women
  • Ghomeshi case a wake-up call
  • Hidden cost of choice
  • Life at the heart of the matter
  • Life issues and the media
  • Need for rational abortion debate
  • New face of the abortion debate
  • People vs. kidneys
  • PET-P press release
  • Pro-life work is making me sick
  • Prolife doesn't mean anti-woman
  • Settle down or "lean in"
  • Sex education is all about values
  • Thank you, Camille Paglia
  • The new face of feminism
  • Today’s law worth discussing
  • When debate is shut down in Canada’s highest places
  • Whither feminism?

Categories

  • All Posts
  • Assisted Suicide/Euthanasia
  • Charitable
  • Ethics
  • Featured Media
  • Featured Posts
  • Feminism
  • Free Expression
  • International
  • Motherhood
  • Other
  • Political
  • Pregnancy Care Centres
  • Reproductive Technologies

All Posts

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Copyright © 2026 · News Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in