ProWomanProLife

  • The Story
  • The Women
  • Notable Columns
  • Contact Us
You are here: Home / All Posts / Sex-selection abortion motion deemed non-votable

Sex-selection abortion motion deemed non-votable

March 21, 2013 by Faye Sonier 1 Comment

Motion M-408, the motion introduced by MP Mark Warawa, was deemed non-votable by the Subcommittee on Private Members’ Business this morning. By a unanimous vote.

I’ve examined the votability criteria in the past and I’m astonished that the Subcommittee found that M-408 failed to meet the standards.

This is the entirety of the motion’s text: “That the House condemn discrimination against females occurring through sex-selective pregnancy termination.”

What happens next?

As a result, the government has won the first in what will likely be a series of procedural battles that will be waged in pursuit of its ultimate goal: avoiding a reprise of the internal caucus divisions brought on by Stephen Woodworth’s bid to strike a committee on the legal definition of ‘human being,’ which did, of course, eventually go down to defeat — but not before garnering the public support of a majority of backbenchers, as well as several high profile ministers, including Jason Kenney and, most unexpectedly, Rona Ambrose.

In any case, Warawa has the right to appeal the decision of the subcommittee — which, I’m told, he will all but certainly do — by making the case for reconsideration before the full procedure and house affairs committee within five days of the subcommittee report being tabled thither.

If he fails to persuade the committee to overturn the ruling, Warawa can put the question to the House of Commons as a whole — provided, that is, that he has the support of at least five MPs — by filing a motion with the speaker, who will then proceed to call for a vote, which is conducted via secret ballot over the next two days.

Read more here and here. Learn more about M-408 here.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmailby feather

Filed Under: All Posts

Comments

  1. Doris G. says

    March 22, 2013 at 11:02 am

    The same committee deemed M-312 votable.

    I guess it’s easier to throw unborn girls under the bus.

    Shameful!

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow Us

Facebooktwitterrssby feather

Notable Columns

  • A pro-woman budget wouldn't tell me how to live my life
  • Bad medicine
  • Birth control pills have side effects
  • Canada Summer Jobs debacle–Can Trudeau call abortion a right?
  • Celebrate these Jubilee jailbirds
  • China has laws against sex selection. But not Canada. Why?
  • Family love is not a contract
  • Freedom to discuss the “choice”
  • Gender quotas don't help business or women
  • Ghomeshi case a wake-up call
  • Hidden cost of choice
  • Life at the heart of the matter
  • Life issues and the media
  • Need for rational abortion debate
  • New face of the abortion debate
  • People vs. kidneys
  • PET-P press release
  • Pro-life work is making me sick
  • Prolife doesn't mean anti-woman
  • Settle down or "lean in"
  • Sex education is all about values
  • Thank you, Camille Paglia
  • The new face of feminism
  • Today’s law worth discussing
  • When debate is shut down in Canada’s highest places
  • Whither feminism?

Categories

  • All Posts
  • Assisted Suicide/Euthanasia
  • Charitable
  • Ethics
  • Featured Media
  • Featured Posts
  • Feminism
  • Free Expression
  • International
  • Motherhood
  • Other
  • Political
  • Pregnancy Care Centres
  • Reproductive Technologies

All Posts

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Copyright © 2026 · News Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in