This writer claims she is so very rational and logical and reasonable. Methinks she doth protest too much.
She responds to someone who says she wants to broaden the discussion about The Pill, asking:
If you’re just asking questions and broadening the discussion, why is it so wrong to come to the conclusion that you want to be on the pill? Why the self-flagellation, if this is about broadening the discussion?
The answer to that, I think, is pretty simple: A very high percentage of women are on The Pill and unaware of side effects of The Pill. They are unaware of any effective replacements for The Pill. I think statistics say 90 per cent of women will be on The Pill at some point in their lives. Therefore, any broadening of the discussion ain’t going to start with getting more women on it.
She’s allowed to rant and defend The Pill and call it natural and do whatever she wants… it’s her web site. I just somewhat resent her doing so as an ambassador of logic. She’s just as emotional as the rest of us.
by 
Leave a Reply