Couldn’t have put this one better myself:
The default position of pro-choicers, whether or not they frame it this way themselves, amounts to a belief that abortion is always the right choice for women who have given it even a moment’s consideration. Once a woman has so much as considered the possibility of abortion, any effort to change her mind – or even just to give her more information to consider – is an attempt to limit her freedom of choice. A woman who doesn’t go through with her impulse to abort is a woman who has fallen victim to some sort of pro-life plot against her rights.
by 
He may be correct, but it sure sounds cynical. In essence, then pro-choice is really only one choice that is correct.
He may be correct, but it sure sounds cynical. In essence, then pro-choice is really the only choice that is correct.
Sorry, that line made no sense. I was put off by the code which didn’t go through correctly. So abortion is the only choice that pro-choicers support. They may “tolerate” someone’s choice to have her baby, but they would “applaud” her choice to abort it.
There is a laser clinic a few blocks from my home. I had a mole on my back that I wanted to get rid of, so I set up an appointment.
Would you believe, the doctor had the nerve to ask me why I wanted that mole removed?
I gave him a couple of reasons, he thought about them for a bit and concurred that they were good reasons, so he decided that he would ply his trade and remove that mole for me. But first he had to go throught ht litany of possible side effects from the laser surgery (which ranged from a sunburn-like rash all the way up to and including death) and I couldn’t have the treatment that day, oh no, I had to go home and htink it over for a week.
All over a little mole. Would that they would go through the same level of informed consent when someone wants to remove a fetus.