ProWomanProLife

  • The Story
  • The Women
  • Notable Columns
  • Contact Us
You are here: Home / All Posts / There’s Andrea making sense again

There’s Andrea making sense again

September 6, 2010 by Brigitte Pellerin 3 Comments

Amazing that we need to keep saying things like this, but apparently we do. And here’s Andrea saying it very well indeed, in today’s Ottawa Citizen:

Dr. Tim Rowe, a British Columbia-based doctor and editor of the Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada, calls having doctors prescribe the pill “paternalistic,” comparing this to the fact that men don’t have to see a doctor to get condoms. It’s almost as if he wants the pill available at gas stations in coin operated dispensers next to cheap perfumes.

For his sake, let’s compare and contrast: Condoms are not ingested and they don’t contain synthetic hormones. They don’t need to be taken at a particular time of day and won’t have their use continued even when there’s no sexual activity. They don’t change the makeup of a man’s body or alter the release of sperm. The World Health Organization did not classify condoms as a known carcinogen. (Yes, you read that right. WHO classified the pill as a carcinogen in 2005.) Virtually all men will acknowledge they’d never stand to take something as body altering as the pill. Not so with women: The late Barbara Seaman, an investigative journalist, wrote a book about treating women with hormones called The Greatest Experiment Ever Performed on Women. In it she documents how the pill came to be and at what cost.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmailby feather

Filed Under: All Posts

Comments

  1. Julie Culshaw says

    September 6, 2010 at 7:22 pm

    My son-in-law showed me this article this morning and said “read this, it’s pretty good”. Indeed it is. well done, Andrea, proud of you.

    Reply
  2. Jennifer Derwey says

    September 7, 2010 at 8:55 am

    Thanks for the book suggestion Andrea! PWPL book club?
    A great article, I hope women really do start to educate themselves about hormonal medications and this is a good step in direction of getting women to question their treatment.

    Reply
  3. Andrea says

    September 7, 2010 at 10:40 am

    Thanks, Julie.
    Could be a good book club, Jennifer, yes. I know I was surprised to learn all I did. Been a while since I read the whole thing, too.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow Us

Facebooktwitterrssby feather

Notable Columns

  • A pro-woman budget wouldn't tell me how to live my life
  • Bad medicine
  • Birth control pills have side effects
  • Canada Summer Jobs debacle–Can Trudeau call abortion a right?
  • Celebrate these Jubilee jailbirds
  • China has laws against sex selection. But not Canada. Why?
  • Family love is not a contract
  • Freedom to discuss the “choice”
  • Gender quotas don't help business or women
  • Ghomeshi case a wake-up call
  • Hidden cost of choice
  • Life at the heart of the matter
  • Life issues and the media
  • Need for rational abortion debate
  • New face of the abortion debate
  • People vs. kidneys
  • PET-P press release
  • Pro-life work is making me sick
  • Prolife doesn't mean anti-woman
  • Settle down or "lean in"
  • Sex education is all about values
  • Thank you, Camille Paglia
  • The new face of feminism
  • Today’s law worth discussing
  • When debate is shut down in Canada’s highest places
  • Whither feminism?

Categories

  • All Posts
  • Assisted Suicide/Euthanasia
  • Charitable
  • Ethics
  • Featured Media
  • Featured Posts
  • Feminism
  • Free Expression
  • International
  • Motherhood
  • Other
  • Political
  • Pregnancy Care Centres
  • Reproductive Technologies

All Posts

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Copyright © 2026 · News Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in