Obviously, since we’re prepared to support a woman’s right to choose despite the fact some women (and men) will choose to have abortions because, for example, they forgot to use birth control, we’re prepared to permit women (and men) to abort fetuses because they’re female.I think it’s pro-choicers who are morally uncomfortable with this reality, who tend to lash out at Ambrose and others, accusing them of having a hidden agenda to bring back laws restricting abortion.
What they’re really saying is Ambrose is guilty of thought crime.
Pro-“choice” irony number 2867: Pro-choicers say they stand for freedom to do what you want to do. But when a Minister says something that disagrees with their supposed freedom-loving stand, they ask for her to be canned. I am not sure they have ever adequately addressed this problem, other than to say again and again and again that “it’s about choice.” Then I say, “but what is the choice? Because if it’s killing then it’s not a choice, and if it’s not, I don’t care.” And then they launch ad hominem attacks about how dumb I am.