Since abortion is currently socially acceptable, a “woman’s right,” an “easy, safe procedure,” bla bla bla, graphic photos are offensive, possibly doctored and must not be shown. But once there is a consensus that something is bad? Well then, bring on the graphics!
The federal government is announcing new, larger explicit warning photos on cigarette packages.
(This article wonders whether graphic photos might not decrease the number of abortions, something many who are pro-choice claim to want to do.)
Graphic images are permitted as long as the subject doesn’t judge anyone’s morals, especially sexual morals. Graphic images of abortion won’t be accepted until society realises that their sexual morals are in the pits. And that will take major conversion of heart.
I have a question before I click the link; does the article that wonders whether graphic photos might decrease the number of abortions contain any graphic pictures, because I won’t click if it does.
Hannah: No it doesn’t. Just text.