ProWomanProLife

  • The Story
  • The Women
  • Notable Columns
  • Contact Us
You are here: Home / 2011 / Archives for July 2011

Archives for July 2011

More education? More contraception?

July 5, 2011 by Jennifer Derwey 7 Comments

“More education and more contraception” has long been the rally cry of abortion advocates. In turn, they blame pro-lifers for increasing abortion numbers, as most pro-lifers disagree with contraception as a solution to ending abortion. Turns out that’s for good reason.

More than a thousand girls a year aged under 15 have an abortion [in the UK], figures revealed.

Terminations are being carried out on youngsters aged just 12 or 13 who have only just started secondary school. […]

Norman Wells, director of  the Family Education Trust charity, said: ‘Every abortion involves a personal tragedy for a mother and a child, and none more so than where the mother herself is a child.

‘But these figures are just the tip of the iceberg. For every child who has had an abortion under the age of 16, there will be many more who are engaging in illegal sexual activity and suffering physical and emotional harm as a result.’

Mr Wells pointed to research  showing it was not ignorance of contraception that leads to high rates of teenage abortions, and said instead the ‘contraceptive culture’ was to blame.

‘Those who imagine the answer lies in more sex education and more contraceptive schemes are sadly mistaken,’ he said. ‘As a result of the contraceptive culture we have tended to separate sexual activity from childbearing in our minds. There is always the possibility intimacy will result in the creation of a new life – that is not something to be done lightly.’

The Rev Joanna Jepson, who campaigned against terminations for minor deformities, warned abortions were being offered without any concern for the gravity of the procedure. She said: ‘The figures for underage girls suggests we have to have a debate about the kind of society we’re creating that leads to so many abortions on demand.

Filed Under: All Posts

Ovulation is sexy

July 5, 2011 by Jennifer Derwey 1 Comment

I can testify that there is something “different” about me during ovulation, and this is no individual quirk. Evolution has crafted women to desire intercourse more during this fertile period, and a new study suggests that women might even be able to detect which man is most likely to desire her as well.

They buy sexier clothing, are more likely to stare at attractive men and — if they are strippers — they get better tips.

And now science has identified yet another characteristic of the elusive ovulating woman: she is better at picking out straight men from the gays.

A new study led by researchers at the University of Toronto suggests that ovulation significantly improves a woman’s ability to judge a man’s sexual orientation.

[…]

A slew of strange ovulation phenomena have been uncovered in recent years as scientists track how the female cycle impacts mating practices. Other research has suggested that ovulating women emit a scent that is more attractive to men, get better tips as lap dancers andbuy sexier clothing in an unconscious attempt to outdo rivals.

[…]

“That suggests they’re not hyper attentive to everything, just men and sex essentially,” Rule says.

In terms of practical application of the findings, Rule says it may be useful for women to know that they appear to be better at picking partners — at least sexual partners — when they are ovulating.

FYI, if you’re on birth control, you can’t ovulate.

_____________________

Andrea adds: Splitting hairs, perhaps, and I know this wasn’t the point of this post, but if you are on birth control, you most likely don’t ovulate. (I believe the Pill first and foremost attempts to stop ovulation, but if that fails, it makes the womb inhospitable to a fertilized egg.)

Filed Under: All Posts

Here comes The Sun

July 4, 2011 by Andrea Mrozek 1 Comment

I’ll be on Ezra Levant’s show tonight discussing Dominique Strauss-Kahn and the general decline of sexual mores in our society and Brian Lilley’s show to discuss gendercide.

Don’t know whether that makes me a sunshine girl, but I can assure you I remain appropriately attired in a business suit! You can watch online, here, if you feel so inclined.

Filed Under: All Posts

Guilt free…

July 4, 2011 by Jennifer Derwey 2 Comments

…doesn’t mean it’s good for you, or society, or your unborn baby. I’ve written before about how a lack of remorse isn’t necessarily a sign that something is “healthy”. This is as true for abortion as it is for other acts of violence.

Now those who commit abortion don’t yet see it as a crime, and because it’s legal, the rest of us are told we ought not view it that way either. But I can only hope, for this woman’s sake, that one day she will better understand that a feeling of “euphoria” is not an indicator of whether or not something is inhumane:

Though I was raised in a Catholic family and apparently encouraged to participate in a “Right to Life” poster contest as a child, I can’t remember a time in my life when I wasn’t pro-choice.  I remember thinking and even saying aloud that I would abort if I got pregnant as a teenager.  Then, as a young twenty-something, I became eager to have children – and I welcomed two very wanted, well-loved babies into the world.  Once things began to deteriorate between their father and I, I knew without a doubt that any future pregnancy we faced would be terminated.

In October of last year, I made good on that promise to myself…

I felt momentarily guilty when one of the other patients in recovery asked me if I ever stopped smiling, but I quickly reminded myself that it was senseless guilt.  After all, smiling is a natural reaction to happiness, and I was happy sitting there.  When they released me to go home fifteen minutes later, I was gladder still.

Keep in mind this woman had an abortion “to do good on a promise to herself.” If the tone sounds calculating and cold, maybe that’s because what she did and how she experienced it is just that. We as a culture recognize the lack of remorse in other acts as “cold-blooded” and contradictory to humanity. Take for example this article,

“How long do I have to live in prison?”

45-year-old Kim Su-cheol, arrested for brutally sexually assaulting a second-grader, asked that question at the Yeongdeungpo Police Station in Seoul on the 10th. He spoke calmly without inquiry about the condition of his victim. It was a moment that showed he is truly an animal with a human face.

According to a member of the Yeongdeungpo Police Sation, he had spent three days in prison since being arrested on the 7th and had slept well and not missed a single meal.

Kim congratulated the investigators on a job well done and made a full confession but while confined he has shown no signs of a remorseful attitude, caring only about the punishment he is to receive.

An employee of the prison said, “Kim asked us how long he has to stay in prison, thinking only about himself, and doesn’t care at all about the victim or show any sense of guilt.”

Kim, who had jus sexually assaulted an eight-year old-girl, told investigators “I feel good, I slept really well” and made other dumbfounding statements which show what a cold-blooded person he is.

Filed Under: All Posts

Inconvenient truths

July 3, 2011 by Andrea Mrozek Leave a Comment

On sex selection abortion, from one Mark Steyn:

Indeed, given the decline in sex ratios in Asia and elsewhere, if daughters had feathers or four legs, they’d be on the endangered species list.

His title is “Killing her softly,” which does nicely as a description of abortion in general. Abortion is a kind of quiet, soft killing, not quite a killing at all, really, or so we are told. When pressed those who actually believe this immediately become unsure as to when it does become a killing, it’s all so very confusing. But until they figure it out, they certainly aren’t working on the precautionary principle, are they.

(h/t)

Filed Under: All Posts

Happy Canada Day!

July 1, 2011 by Andrea Mrozek Leave a Comment

To all the readers/supporters/antagonists of ProWomanProLife, enjoy the day. Happy Canada Day!

Filed Under: All Posts

Rachel Maddow: Spare me (please)

July 1, 2011 by Andrea Mrozek 1 Comment

[youtube:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vPwbVTj8syU”>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vPwbVTj8syU]

Rachel Maddow lambasts anyone of a Republican (conservative) persuasion because generally, we are against more red tape. I say “we” because I am one such person who is against more red tape. I’m also pro-life. And apparently what Republicans in Kansas are doing is regulating the heck out of abortion clinics, so that they are forced to close.

Here’s the thing: I’m also very firmly in favour of the will of the people aka democracy. And what Roe v. Wade did was overrule every state on the matter of abortion and tell so many: Your vote doesn’t count. In the United States there are a great many states who would outlaw abortion, based on a free vote. Roe v. Wade doesn’t let them. It comes down from on high and dictates what will be.

My point then, is this: where the government through the legislative arm acts corruptly, it engenders corruption. People try to get around it in different ways. More red tape to outlaw abortion clinics would be one such tactic.

My second point is this: Oftentimes these regulations merely bring abortion clinics up to the existing standards for every other health-related clinic. In some states, so fearful were feminists of losing abortion rights, that they failed to regulate abortion clinics at all. The end result is what Mark Steyn calls Big Government’s Back Alley. From Philadelphia:

Furniture and blankets were stained with blood. Instruments were not properly sterilized. Disposable medical supplies were not disposed of; they were reused, over and over again. Medical equipment – such as the defibrillator, the EKG, the pulse oximeter, the blood pressure cuff – was generally broken; even when it worked, it wasn’t used. The emergency exit was padlocked shut. And scattered throughout, in cabinets, in the basement, in a freezer, in jars and bags and plastic jugs, were fetal remains. It was a baby charnel house.

Pretty gross, hey? Wait, there’s more. From New Jersey:

The Department of Health and Senior Services investigated the abortion facility and found dirty forceps, rusty crochet hooks used to remove IUDs, and a quarter-inch of dirt and debris under an examining table.

So long as those abortion clinics remain open…

But finally, it all comes down to what we think abortion is. And Rachel Maddow, let me take a wild and crazy guess, thinks it is an inoffensive procedure. Whereas, (I’m also guessing) the majority in the state of Kansas think it is murder. Roe v. Wade doesn’t let people think what they want to think, so we come to a strange place whereby Republicans act like Democrats, trying to place more red tape over abortion clinics, to put them out of business.

But Maddow: please spare me the pain of likening this to trying to put honest small businessmen out of work, or making it hard to do interstate trade. This isn’t about freedom. It’s about the injustice that is abortion, it’s about special state-sanctioned clinics where we try to make a despicable procedure normal and don’t even subject them to the same regulations as other outpatient procedures. And it’s about an unjust law (Roe v. Wade) that tells all Americans they have to like abortion, even where they don’t.

Filed Under: All Posts

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

Follow Us

Facebooktwitterrssby feather

Notable Columns

  • A pro-woman budget wouldn't tell me how to live my life
  • Bad medicine
  • Birth control pills have side effects
  • Canada Summer Jobs debacle–Can Trudeau call abortion a right?
  • Celebrate these Jubilee jailbirds
  • China has laws against sex selection. But not Canada. Why?
  • Family love is not a contract
  • Freedom to discuss the “choice”
  • Gender quotas don't help business or women
  • Ghomeshi case a wake-up call
  • Hidden cost of choice
  • Life at the heart of the matter
  • Life issues and the media
  • Need for rational abortion debate
  • New face of the abortion debate
  • People vs. kidneys
  • PET-P press release
  • Pro-life work is making me sick
  • Prolife doesn't mean anti-woman
  • Settle down or "lean in"
  • Sex education is all about values
  • Thank you, Camille Paglia
  • The new face of feminism
  • Today’s law worth discussing
  • When debate is shut down in Canada’s highest places
  • Whither feminism?

Categories

  • All Posts
  • Assisted Suicide/Euthanasia
  • Charitable
  • Ethics
  • Featured Media
  • Featured Posts
  • Feminism
  • Free Expression
  • International
  • Motherhood
  • Other
  • Political
  • Pregnancy Care Centres
  • Reproductive Technologies

All Posts

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Copyright © 2026 · News Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in