I plan on getting the scoop from my Polish cousin, but for now, we’ll rely on this web site for the news from Poland:

[L]awmakers in Poland have cast an initial vote in favor of legislation that would ban all abortions in that country…

In an open letter to the country’s lawmakers, a group of Polish “women journalists” said that the measure would help to restore moral order to the nation, adding that a vote for the bill “would be a vote for the protection of women, and the protection of their relationship with their children. It would also be a vote for the restoration of dignity and respect for motherhood. It would be in the interest not only of women and children, but also of fathers, families, and all of society.”

I’ll be on Ezra Levant’s show tonight discussing Dominique Strauss-Kahn and the general decline of sexual mores in our society and Brian Lilley’s show to discuss gendercide.

Don’t know whether that makes me a sunshine girl, but I can assure you I remain appropriately attired in a business suit! You can watch online, here, if you feel so inclined.

On sex selection abortion, from one Mark Steyn:

Indeed, given the decline in sex ratios in Asia and elsewhere, if daughters had feathers or four legs, they’d be on the endangered species list.

His title is “Killing her softly,” which does nicely as a description of abortion in general. Abortion is a kind of quiet, soft killing, not quite a killing at all, really, or so we are told. When pressed those who actually believe this immediately become unsure as to when it does become a killing, it’s all so very confusing. But until they figure it out, they certainly aren’t working on the precautionary principle, are they.

(h/t)

To all the readers/supporters/antagonists of ProWomanProLife, enjoy the day. Happy Canada Day!

[youtube:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vPwbVTj8syU”>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vPwbVTj8syU]

Rachel Maddow lambasts anyone of a Republican (conservative) persuasion because generally, we are against more red tape. I say “we” because I am one such person who is against more red tape. I’m also pro-life. And apparently what Republicans in Kansas are doing is regulating the heck out of abortion clinics, so that they are forced to close.

Here’s the thing: I’m also very firmly in favour of the will of the people aka democracy. And what Roe v. Wade did was overrule every state on the matter of abortion and tell so many: Your vote doesn’t count. In the United States there are a great many states who would outlaw abortion, based on a free vote. Roe v. Wade doesn’t let them. It comes down from on high and dictates what will be.

My point then, is this: where the government through the legislative arm acts corruptly, it engenders corruption. People try to get around it in different ways. More red tape to outlaw abortion clinics would be one such tactic.

My second point is this: Oftentimes these regulations merely bring abortion clinics up to the existing standards for every other health-related clinic. In some states, so fearful were feminists of losing abortion rights, that they failed to regulate abortion clinics at all. The end result is what Mark Steyn calls Big Government’s Back Alley. From Philadelphia:

Furniture and blankets were stained with blood. Instruments were not properly sterilized. Disposable medical supplies were not disposed of; they were reused, over and over again. Medical equipment – such as the defibrillator, the EKG, the pulse oximeter, the blood pressure cuff – was generally broken; even when it worked, it wasn’t used. The emergency exit was padlocked shut. And scattered throughout, in cabinets, in the basement, in a freezer, in jars and bags and plastic jugs, were fetal remains. It was a baby charnel house.

Pretty gross, hey? Wait, there’s more. From New Jersey:

The Department of Health and Senior Services investigated the abortion facility and found dirty forceps, rusty crochet hooks used to remove IUDs, and a quarter-inch of dirt and debris under an examining table.

So long as those abortion clinics remain open…

But finally, it all comes down to what we think abortion is. And Rachel Maddow, let me take a wild and crazy guess, thinks it is an inoffensive procedure. Whereas, (I’m also guessing) the majority in the state of Kansas think it is murder. Roe v. Wade doesn’t let people think what they want to think, so we come to a strange place whereby Republicans act like Democrats, trying to place more red tape over abortion clinics, to put them out of business.

But Maddow: please spare me the pain of likening this to trying to put honest small businessmen out of work, or making it hard to do interstate trade. This isn’t about freedom. It’s about the injustice that is abortion, it’s about special state-sanctioned clinics where we try to make a despicable procedure normal and don’t even subject them to the same regulations as other outpatient procedures. And it’s about an unjust law (Roe v. Wade) that tells all Americans they have to like abortion, even where they don’t.

It’s summer. Good times. For me this means being outdoors as much as humanly possibly. The other day I biked from work to the swimming pool (outdoors) and did laps (did I mention the pool is outdoors? Love it.) After doing laps I went to play beach volleyball. Changing out of my swimsuit, I put on workout attire, applied no makeup, did precisely nothing to my wet hair (forgot my brush) and got back on my bike.

By the time I was almost there, I realized I was hungry and so pulled over at a concession stand to purchase dinner, which was a hotdog.

Because I was late, I started walking my bike and eating the hotdog as quickly as I possibly could.

Just as I hit the beach area, I scarfed down the last (big) bite of the hotdog. I just want you to have the complete picture as I saw myself: wet from the pool, sweaty from the bikeride, possibly with mustard dripping down my chin and unable to speak because I had just taken too large a bite. Classy!

At the point at which I could not speak for chewing the hotdog, two guys approached me. Here I thought, oh great, they are going to want directions somewhere and they will have to watch me chew for five minutes before I can answer.

But no, they approached so that one could say, “You are the prettiest girl I have seen all day.”

My actual thought was: He must be drunk.

I recount this on this blog for the following reasons. A) It’s nice when men pay women random compliments that are not lecherous and well meant. B) It’s nice in particular when they pay me random compliments, I’m not gonna lie. C) I can’t stress enough to you how modest my attire was, and these fellows were leaving a beach filled with less-than-modest ladies. D) The immediate female thought is I can’t possibly look good, so they must be visually impaired, or they must be drunk where apparently the male thought is more simple: she looks pretty, and I’m going to tell her.

Some random thoughts after a random moment.

This interview with Robert P. George is about marriage in response to New York legalizing same sex marriage. But it more than touches on sexuality and I find it aptly describes the culture we are currently living in. Here in Ottawa, a conservative talk radio station recently asked listeners to respond to the New York decision. When one listener called in to express a view in support of traditional marriage, the host steamrolled him with his own view in support of same sex marriage.

Now Robert P. George is no dummie and I don’t think he’s a homophobe, either. I do buy into his arguments; they make sense to me, though they didn’t always. But even as I read this piece, I realize I probably couldn’t convey the depth of what he is saying to the average person on the street. “Sexual liberation” no matter the fact that it was initially championed by the likes of Hugh Hefner, sounds like freedom to people, and freedom, we rightly think, is good. So explaining that “sexual liberation” is actually the opposite of freedom, that it binds and constrains and takes human beings further from their potential, is a tough sell.

What I’m saying here, in a convoluted way, is that I agree with Robert P. George. He’s smart and he knows what he is talking about. But I don’t think we’re going to win this particular battle over same sex marriage because we are poorly educated, it’s a sound bite culture, and arguments in favour of traditional marriage fit better into academic journals, rather than on the nightly news.

From Ohio:

Across the country, Republicans and Democrats are wrangling over proposed changes to state abortion laws. On Tuesday, the Ohio House of Representatives voted on a measure that has the power to transform the state’s — and the nation’s — abortion dialogue. In a landmark move, the House voted 54 to 43 to ban abortions after a fetal heartbeat becomes detectable to doctors.

The measure, known as the “Heartbeat Bill,” has been touted by Republicans in the state, with the majority of them voting affirmatively for its passage. There has been no shortage of controversy surrounding the proposal, as a heartbeat can be detected as early as six weeks (by some accounts, it can be found even earlier). Also, the measure does not include exemptions for rape or incest, but it does include one for the health of the mother.

I could have written this, so wholeheartedly do I agree with it. The one section I might add is the physical repercussions for many women of taking said pill every day, effects which are not liberating by a long shot. This section on how the Pill increased abortions is something we have yet to fully grasp hold of. It’s very counter-intuitive:

Originally, the Pill was expected to reduce abortion by reducing unwanted pregnancies. However, this “iron curtain” between sex and the possibility of babies had the unintended consequence of dramatically boosting the rate of abortion, which spiked dramatically around 1968-70, well before 1973’s Roe v Wade. This was because of the growing sense of having a “right not to be pregnant” if a sexually active woman didn’t want to be. She could also face pressure toward abortion from her partner who didn’t want his sexual partner hampered by pregnancy.

Things to think about and talk about, to be sure, since every woman gets on the Pill at one point or another.

I don’t know what to say:

Girls as young as one are being forced into sex change operations in India by parents desperate for a son. Surgeons in the city of Indore are reported to be ‘converting’ hundreds of girls a year, who are subsequently pumped full of hormone drugs.