ProWomanProLife

  • The Story
  • The Women
  • Notable Columns
  • Contact Us
You are here: Home / Archives for Andrea Mrozek

What a gal (sarcasm alert)

August 27, 2015 by Andrea Mrozek 1 Comment

Huh. I knew Margaret Sanger said some racist things, but I didn’t realize she, the founder of Planned Parenthood, actually attended Ku Klux Klan rallies.

A bunch of pro-life folks are protesting her bust, sitting alongside Rosa Parks in the National Portrait Gallery in DC. (Which is, incidentally, my favourite DC museum.)

Sanger, a proponent of eugenics, founded the American Birth Control League in 1921, which became part of the Planned Parenthood Federation of America in 1942.

In an article titled “Birth Control and Racial Betterment,” published in 1919, Sanger wrote that the “diseased and incompetent masses” threaten to “overwhelm all that eugenics can do among those whose economic condition is better.”

“Birth Control, on the other hand, not only opens the way to the eugenist, but it preserves his work,” Sanger wrote.

Sanger wrote in her book “Woman and the New Race” that the population control methods she advocated would bring about the “materials of a new race.”

“Birth control itself, often denounced as a violation of natural law, is nothing more or less than the facilitation of the process of weeding out the unfit, of preventing the birth of defectives or of those who will become defectives,” Sanger wrote.

What a legacy.

margaret-sanger-2

Margaret Sanger, founder of Planned Parenthood

 

 

Filed Under: All Posts, Featured Posts, Feminism

Just say no to a “women’s issue” debate

August 25, 2015 by Andrea Mrozek 1 Comment

Women

I was against a women’s issues debate in the Canadian federal election because it tends to be that people drastically opposed to what I believe pretend to represent me, and I’m just supposed to stand there, smiling, nodding, and saying things like, “I do love little kittens.” So it’s a relief that there won’t be one. Huzzah. There is of course the additional hypocrisy that the group claiming to want a debate doesn’t actually want to debate. On abortion, their talking point has consistently been that abortion is a right not up for debate. So when pro-lifers ask them to defend their views publicly, they say no.

[youtube:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LS37SNYjg8w]

 

 

Filed Under: All Posts, Featured Posts, Feminism

The folly of the FDA

August 19, 2015 by Andrea Mrozek 2 Comments

Today, “female viagra” was approved by the FDA.

If you want to read about how and why this happened, click here.

Flibanserin, a serotonergic drug, was initially in clinical trials as an antidepressant. Despite its history of being a “thrice failed antidepressant,” Sprout persevered and used the “finding” that some women in the drug trials said they experienced a slight increase in sexual desire as the reason to repackage the drug. Flibanserin was soon in clinical trials for Hypoactive Sexual Desire Disorder (HSDD), an indication listed in the previous edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders). Sprout now maintains that HSDD is comparable to the DSM-5’s “Female Sexual Interest/Arousal Disorder,” and that women deserve a drug to treat this disorder.

As part of the attempt to gain approval for its drug, Sprout  initiated an ingenious marketing campaign, “Even the Score,” claiming that there was a sexism inherent in the number of FDA-approved treatments for sexual disorders: 26 for men and “zero for women.” However, this claim was false. There are only 8 drugs that treat male sexual dysfunction, and none are FDA-approved for low libido.

However, the “Even the Score” campaign worked. Sprout was able to get women’s groups to sign on to the idea that getting this drug approved was almost akin to getting Title IX passed.

Keep reading. It’s pretty fascinating stuff about the politics of drug approval for conditions that don’t exist, with no proof they do anything over and above a placebo.

Filed Under: All Posts, Featured Posts, Feminism

When Godwin’s Law doesn’t apply

August 11, 2015 by Andrea Mrozek 1 Comment

I generally adhere to Godwin’s Law, which states that the first person to compare to Hitler or the Nazis in an online debate has lost the argument. I believe the Holocaust is a uniquely terrible event in history. Therefore, it ought rarely be compared to anything.

When might I diverge from this? When people kill other people, take the body parts, call them trash, and then declare it’s better that this trash be used for research rather than just be thrown out.

Human tissue can be used for research. That’s not the point. It’s all about intent: When we purposefully kill, and the person killed never gave consent to be used for research, then it’s a crime, whether or not the state recognizes it as such.
Over time, the state has recognized immoral actions as legal. What is legal isn’t what is right by a long shot. People get confused about this.
When we use baby body parts and express a callous disregard for that life and those parts then we have indeed entered criminal, and yes, I’d argue, Nazi territory. Most of even the most strident pro-choicers get it, because some of the folks in the blogosphere who never miss a beat blogging about any and every abortion-related story have fallen quite silent this time. That, by the way, is a hopeful sign.

Filed Under: All Posts, Ethics, Featured Posts, Feminism

One woman’s experience with the abortion pill

August 6, 2015 by Andrea Mrozek 5 Comments

Since everyone is saying RU-486 is so super safe and easy, it is important to at least mention/warn women of what they might experience. I’m going to post these things periodically, because it’s one thing to read about the abortion pill being legalized, and it’s another thing altogether to take it.

Two things, no wait, three, that really bother me. 1) the voices of these women are never heard 2) it appears that so many of those women who love, luv, luuuuuuv the abortion pill are at an age when they would never have to take it 3) the media never report with any concern for the fact that this can be very damaging to women. They never ask any tough questions. Wait, I’m not done with things that really bother me here. 4) Men, who due to biology can but rarely understand what it means to have a painful menstrual cycle, will now begin to associate the abortion pill with, oh say, taking a Tylenol. 5) Women encourage other women and men to see it that way.

Gonna be a rude awakening.

Read one woman’s experience:

It was around midnight and I had been in the bathroom for a good 12 hours. I knew I couldn’t leave yet. I didn’t want to lay in the bed…the bleeding was too heavy. And the clots were still coming; not as often, but they were still coming.

Sick young woman in bathroom by toilet hugging knees

 

Filed Under: All Posts, Featured Posts

Alabama, Louisiana, New Hampshire

August 6, 2015 by Andrea Mrozek 4 Comments

What do they have in common? They have all de-funded Planned Parenthood. I’d call that success.

Alabama has become the third state to de-fund the Planned Parenthood abortion business in the wake of five videos exposing how the abortion giant sells the body parts of aborted babies for research. The state follows Louisiana, which is revoking a contract with Planned Parenthood using state Medicaid dollars, and New Hampshire, which zapped $650,000 in state taxpayer funding.

alabama-sign

Filed Under: All Posts, Featured Posts

Mark Steyn on Planned Parenthood

August 6, 2015 by Andrea Mrozek 2 Comments

All of it is worth reading:

~After I discussed the matter with Sean Hannity on Fox News last week, I got a barrage of abuse from abortion absolutists with a familiar talking point: abortions are “only three per cent” of what Planned Parenthood does. This statistic is very curiously formulated: The group said that abortions account for three per cent of the 10.9m services its provides in nearly 700 clinics.

Even if you know what that actually means, the correct response is: So what? Do American liberals listen to what they’re saying: What percentage of a business model does selling baby parts have to be for it to disturb you? Any murderer could make the same defense: Murderers actually spend very little time murdering. For 99.99 per cent of the time Major Hasan was providing psychiatric services to US military personnel, and standing on the table, opening fire and yelling “Allahu Akbar!” was only 0.01 per cent of his business model. So what?

That dentist in Minnesota everyone wants to string up: C’mon, give the guy a break. Ninety-seven percent of his time is devoted to cavities and root canals. The lion-killing portion of his schedule is minimal.

If you were told that the fellow at the convenience store devotes 97 per cent of his time to selling groceries and gasoline but once in a while he likes to go down to the seedy part of town, chop up a hooker and leave the pieces in a trunk at the airport, but don’t worry, it’s only three per cent of what he does, would you still want to buy a quart of milk from the guy? American liberals say: What’s the problem? They’re so used to looking the other way, they’ve immobilized their moral compass.

Reid

Steyn’s caption: “Senator Harry Reid and taxpayer-funded baby-parts mogul Cecile Richards.”

 

Filed Under: All Posts, Ethics, Featured Media

It’s time for a Vaclav Havel quote

August 4, 2015 by Andrea Mrozek Leave a Comment

Yes indeed.

The real test of a man is not how well he plays the role he has invented for himself, but how well he plays the role that destiny assigned to him.” –Vaclav Havel

Vaclav_Havel_cropped

Filed Under: All Posts, Ethics, Featured Posts

Surrogacy has grave risks

August 3, 2015 by Andrea Mrozek Leave a Comment

And this article talks about what they are:

All of these procedures to which the egg provider and surrogate are subjected pose devastating short- and long-term health risks. The short-term risks include ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS), characterized by difficulty breathing, excruciating pelvic pain, swelling of the hands and legs, severe abdominal pain and swelling, nausea, vomiting, weight gain, low urine output, and diarrhea. OHSS can be fatal. Other short-term risks are ruptured cysts, ovarian torsion, blood clots, chronic pelvic pain, premature menopause, infection, difficulty breathing, allergic reaction, bleeding, kidney failure, stroke, and even death.

The long-term risks include cancer, especially reproductive—ovarian, breast, or endometrial—cancers, and (in a sad irony) future infertility. Both surrogates and egg providers are typically given Lupron, a drug that is not approved by the FDA for fertility use (it is used to treat men with advanced prostate cancer) to produce the onset of menopause with potentially incapacitating and long-lasting effects. Lupron and Synarel are used off-label and are Category X drugs, meaning that if a woman gets pregnant while taking the drug, the fetus will be harmed. Lupron also puts women at risk for intracranial pressure.

Brittany Maynard, the young woman who killed herself in Oregon after learning she had a terminal brain tumor, was also an egg donor.

This information came to me from a source who wished to remain anonymous, and who, because she was very close to Brittany, knew that Brittany had been an egg donor. My source reached out to me because she was aware of my work exposing the risks, known and unknown, to young women who make the decision to donate—or considerably more often, sell—their eggs, which is what Brittany did. I was contacted because this person was worried that this decision might have played a role in Brittany’s developing a glioblastoma.

To me, these things are tragic, because full information is not out there, women do not make informed choices, and also because the human tendency when you are young and healthy is to say “it won’t happen to me and I don’t care if it does.” This is the same mentality around abortion. Women may hear of possible health risks, mental or physical, but in the short term, they don’t care. Until they do. At which point, it’s too late.

Maggies-Story-Poster-wide-300x169

Filed Under: All Posts, Featured Posts

Cecil and the Planned Parenthood scandal

July 31, 2015 by Andrea Mrozek 2 Comments

Exactly.

Consider the views of those who care deeply about animal rights. What drives them? Animals are helpless creatures, often subject to terrible violence, and they cannot speak for themselves. Their dignity and value are quite inconvenient for those who want to exploit them, and their needs are pushed to the margins of our culture. Indeed, we are rarely forced to confront the dignity of animals, especially animals we eat. This is what drives the passion of activists in their attempts to speak for voiceless animals. And in their zeal to bring us face to face with animal suffering, tellingly, they regularly use undercover videos. These videos have been quite successful in bringing some terrible realities to light – for example, the conditions of chickens in the worst factory farms.

Anti-abortion activists are driven in similar ways. Prenatal children are also helpless and often subject to terrible violence. They obviously cannot speak for themselves. Their dignity and value are inconvenient for those who want abortion to be broadly legal and who want to use fetal tissue for research. They too are largely invisible, though this is changing because of ultrasound imagery and smartphone applications that can listen to a baby’s heartbeat in the womb. Words like “fetus,” “tissue” and “products of conception” help keep the reality of abortion at bay. But as we have now seen with the Planned Parenthood story, anti-abortion activists have also been successful in using undercover videos in bringing terrible reality to light – what in one setting is called the “products of conception” in another is a “baby bump,” and the antiseptic “tissue” means functioning organs.

Cecil

Filed Under: All Posts, Ethics, Featured Posts

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • …
  • 279
  • Next Page »

Follow Us

Facebooktwitterrssby feather

Notable Columns

  • A pro-woman budget wouldn't tell me how to live my life
  • Bad medicine
  • Birth control pills have side effects
  • Canada Summer Jobs debacle–Can Trudeau call abortion a right?
  • Celebrate these Jubilee jailbirds
  • China has laws against sex selection. But not Canada. Why?
  • Family love is not a contract
  • Freedom to discuss the “choice”
  • Gender quotas don't help business or women
  • Ghomeshi case a wake-up call
  • Hidden cost of choice
  • Life at the heart of the matter
  • Life issues and the media
  • Need for rational abortion debate
  • New face of the abortion debate
  • People vs. kidneys
  • PET-P press release
  • Pro-life work is making me sick
  • Prolife doesn't mean anti-woman
  • Settle down or "lean in"
  • Sex education is all about values
  • Thank you, Camille Paglia
  • The new face of feminism
  • Today’s law worth discussing
  • When debate is shut down in Canada’s highest places
  • Whither feminism?

Categories

  • All Posts
  • Assisted Suicide/Euthanasia
  • Charitable
  • Ethics
  • Featured Media
  • Featured Posts
  • Feminism
  • Free Expression
  • International
  • Motherhood
  • Other
  • Political
  • Pregnancy Care Centres
  • Reproductive Technologies

All Posts

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Copyright © 2026 · News Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in