ProWomanProLife

  • The Story
  • The Women
  • Notable Columns
  • Contact Us
You are here: Home / Archives for Patricia Egan

“Yes we can.”

February 17, 2008 by Patricia Egan Leave a Comment

I have to admit that I find Barack Obama charming. But then, the author Rumer Godden described her first husband as “charming”, adding “I have mistrusted charm every since”.

In the same way, I find something compelling and catchy about this “yes we can” video.  If nothing else (and I’m pretty sure there is nothing else), it’s catchy. At the same time, the rhythmic chanting of glassy-eyed, “I’m too cool to have facial expressions” celebrities is faintly creepy. 

[youtube:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jjXyqcx-mYY]

My seven-year old summed the whole message up after about 5 seconds of viewing: “Yes, we can what? That’s dumb.” 

But I have discovered a way of increasing  the entertainment factor of the video exponentially: every time one of the celebrity-automatons echoes “Yes we can”, answer “No you can’t”. This provides good training for dealing with politicians with grand ideas for “change” and, incidentally, small children. After all, if you have to say a phrase eighty times a day, it’s good to have a catchy beat to go with it.

_______________________

Andrea adds: “Yes, we can” look profoundly serious and important while saying nothing of substance. Yes, we can. (From time to time I consider whether I could join a political party. Just when I start to think perhaps I could, I see something like this…and it’s back to square one. No, I can’t.)

Filed Under: All Posts Tagged With: "yes we can", Barack Obama, Rumer Godden

Bella

February 6, 2008 by Patricia Egan Leave a Comment

[youtube:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mJ9AkTrbxgk] 

I’m so very curious about this movie: Bella won the People’s Choice Award at the Toronto International Film Festival.  I won’t pretend to understand whether that’s significant or not, but it sounds impressive. 

Bella now has a Canadian distributor. According to the movie’s producer, the plan is to open in Toronto, Calgary and Vancouver in March.  I could not get any information as to specific dates but watch your newspaper listings. 

Filed Under: All Posts Tagged With: Bella

By any other name

February 1, 2008 by Patricia Egan Leave a Comment

A few days ago, a woman named Renate Lindeman wrote an opinion piece in the Ottawa Citizen. She is the mother of two children with Down Syndrome. She is also the president of the Nova Scotia Down Syndrome Society. Over the last year, she noticed a startling development.  Registrations with the Society declined significantly. She didn’t have to look far for an explanation: The drop in registrations coincided with the province’s introduction of an expanded prenatal screening program.  

Now, I would describe myself as pro-life and Renate describes herself as pro-choice. To me, this situation, and our discomfort with the eugenics of it, highlight the “hollowness” of choice rhetoric – the “freedom” to abort very quickly becomes the duty to abort. (See my feticide post; I am also assuming that eugenics makes most of us a little uncomfortable.) Renate sees the situation more as a failure to provide women with meaningful choice. She writes: 

Many hospitals across Canada do not bother to inform about living with Down syndrome, but instead limit information on their information to the prenatal screening — and prevention — process.  This isn’t offering a choice to women; this is leaving women no choice…

With only negative or misinformation available it is a sad but true statistic that over 90 per cent of parents in Canada choose abortion when faced with a prenatal diagnosis of Down syndrome. As president of the Nova Scotia Down Syndrome Society I have seen the number of registrations of new babies drop an astonishing 85 per cent…

Is this the aimed objective? 

I’m not sure what other objective there can be that would justify over-strained provincial health budgets being extended to include enhanced prenatal screening. In Ontario, doctors are required by law to offer maternal serum screening, even when the pregnant woman has indicated no interest whatever in prenatal screening. I’m cynical enough to wonder if somewhere a bureaucrat has justified the cost of prenatal screening by the savings incurred by the elimination of “defective” infants who might otherwise weigh heavily on the health system. 

Renate isn’t waiting for provincial health department or the hospitals that “care” for pregnant women to take the initiative to provide accurate information on living with Down Syndrome. She and the Nova Scotia Down Syndrome Society have an excellent website, wonderfully titled “Down Home”. I recommend it highly. 

Renate has also initiated an online petition asking for a Prenatal Diagnosed Condition Awareness Act. This legislation

would ensure provinces and territories … set aside appropriate resources for the establishment of educational and awareness campaigns that will enhance knowledge about diagnosed conditions and allow organizations to create and distribute balanced and accurate information to women and prospective parents.

Filed Under: All Posts Tagged With: Down Syndrome, Eugenics, Nova Scotia, Ottawa Citizen, Renate Lindeman

“We commit feticide”

January 28, 2008 by Patricia Egan Leave a Comment

Those aren’t my words but those of Liberal MP and former B.C. premier Ujjal Dosanjh in Saturday’s National Post. He was asked to comment on the questions raised by the death of a toddler in Delta, B.C., allegedly at the hands of her father. The Post article concerns the speculation that the two-year old was murdered for the crime of being a girl and her parent’s third daughter. The tradegy raises the ugly issue of gender selection and it was in this context that Mr. Dosanjh made these comments: “What does it say about us as human beings? You have a situation in India and here, where we commit feticide and we kill girls when they’re of tender age. Then we kill them and abuse them after marriage. And it has to stop.” 

It seems that Mr. Dosanjh is otherwise pretty firmly pro-choice …  except when parents are choosing not to have a daughter. At one level, that kind of makes sense. It’s pretty obvious that gender selection abortions devalue the sex selected for elimination. And Mr. Dosanjh, and many others otherwise committed to “choice”, recognize that effect and are repelled by it. 

But doesn’t this mean that a woman’s freedom to choose isn’t unlimited after all?

If we don’t want to send a negative message about the value of girls in our society by allowing them to be aborted, what are we content to say about the disabled, the “less than perfect” fetus, which seems to be such an acceptable target for abortion? What are we saying about children in general with an unrestricted abortion license?

I guess my question for Mr Dosanjh is, why aren’t these things feticide also?   

Filed Under: All Posts Tagged With: sex-selection abortions, Ujjal Dosanjh

Where’s Sesame Street’s The Count when you need him?

January 26, 2008 by Patricia Egan Leave a Comment

Did you know that the estimated crowd at the March for Life in Washington, D.C. earlier this week was 225,000? Yeah, neither did I, until I checked on Lifesite. And I had checked the entire front section of the National Post every day. Nothing, not even a paragraph on the sidebar on the World/US page. Now, admittedly, the crowd estimate came from the Convention Director for the March for Life. The Washington Post‘s coverage (on page 3) stated that “tens of thousands” participated in the March. Not bad, but AP’s coverage described the crowd as numbering “thousands” and then went on to mention, in paragraph 2 of their story, no less, that “[a] smaller crowd of several dozen abortion-rights supporters held their own rally later”. The New York Times’ brief coverage did not even include a number, although they had published the organizer’s estimate of attendance in a (much longer) article covering an anti-war rally that took place last January.   

Filed Under: All Posts Tagged With: crowd, estimates, March for life, Washington

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • 2

Follow Us

Facebooktwitterrssby feather

Notable Columns

  • A pro-woman budget wouldn't tell me how to live my life
  • Bad medicine
  • Birth control pills have side effects
  • Canada Summer Jobs debacle–Can Trudeau call abortion a right?
  • Celebrate these Jubilee jailbirds
  • China has laws against sex selection. But not Canada. Why?
  • Family love is not a contract
  • Freedom to discuss the “choice”
  • Gender quotas don't help business or women
  • Ghomeshi case a wake-up call
  • Hidden cost of choice
  • Life at the heart of the matter
  • Life issues and the media
  • Need for rational abortion debate
  • New face of the abortion debate
  • People vs. kidneys
  • PET-P press release
  • Pro-life work is making me sick
  • Prolife doesn't mean anti-woman
  • Settle down or "lean in"
  • Sex education is all about values
  • Thank you, Camille Paglia
  • The new face of feminism
  • Today’s law worth discussing
  • When debate is shut down in Canada’s highest places
  • Whither feminism?

Categories

  • All Posts
  • Assisted Suicide/Euthanasia
  • Charitable
  • Ethics
  • Featured Media
  • Featured Posts
  • Feminism
  • Free Expression
  • International
  • Motherhood
  • Other
  • Political
  • Pregnancy Care Centres
  • Reproductive Technologies

All Posts

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Copyright © 2026 · News Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in