Great points about how we are losing our value on human life. He is mentioning those who advocate for post-birth abortion/infanticide.
When did women become persons?
Excellent point, Mr. Anderson makes. About how women were once not considered persons. Every person has inherent human dignity. Hear, hear.
David Anderson continues on M-312
It’s a decent speech. However, I must admit, I am merely grateful that Irene Mathyssen is no longer speaking; still recovering. It was like listening to a preaching school marm.
David Anderson on M-312
He supports it. He says he has received many letters on the topic and many from young women. Hear hear.
Wow, the drama
Irene is a drama queen, I have decided. Impressive performance in the category of conjuring up offense.
However, she has just done something useful by highlighting all the legislation she dislikes from backbenchers on the life issue. It shows how this issue is never going away and we are going to face more and more attempts to restore justice to Canada.
Irene Mathyssen continues on M-312
“They turn pregnant women into lesser citizens whose rights are subordinated to the rights of a fertilized egg,” she says. Apparently if we discuss the issue of when life begins we are no longer a sustainable, just society. Or a world leader in women’s rights.
A lot of her speech is spoken in very huffy tones.
Now she is spouting the myths about how abortion saves women’s lives. Wish I could show her the data.
Irene Mathyssen is offended
She is offended that someone would classify a fertilized egg as a person.
But why do I care if she is offended? I care about what is true. Her offense means absolutely nothing, no matter how passionately she expresses it.
Irene Mathyssen is up
She mentions that women have fought hard for the right to choose when they have children. Which of course alludes to the fact that the fetus is a child.
Wonderful speech from Stella Ambler
This debate is about fundamental, universal human rights and about a 400 year old law frozen in time.
I join Stella Ambler in supporting M-312. What a woman. Great speech.
Why would anyone oppose a respectful dialogue?
On M-312, Ambler asks why you would oppose debate and dialogue.
Refusing to discuss the issue is letting down the vast majority of Canadians who believe in honest and just laws.
Yes.
- « Previous Page
- 1
- …
- 146
- 147
- 148
- 149
- 150
- …
- 480
- Next Page »