This kind of story bugs me. I’m all for children, and children-friendly institutions. But not everyone has to be. If you want your restaurant, or movie theatre, or campground, or what have you, to be an adult-only place, you should be able to do so. (You should also be allowed to operate a smoking restaurant or bar or what have you.) Maybe your business won’t work, and maybe it will. It should be up to you, to business owner, to decide whether the benefits outweighs the costs. Just make the rules clear to everyone, and be nice about it, is all. Sometimes, you pay good money to eat a fancy meal at a fancy restaurant and you want to be able to enjoy that without children running around (that’s why parents hire babysitters every now and then).

If you talk to almost any woman long enough, you’ll uncover an incident of violence (physical or emotional) somewhere in her past. While men are victims of violence just as often, the aggressors of women are most often male. It comes as no surprise then that the new study from Statistics Canada reveals that the majority of dating violence victims are female.

While teenage girls experienced 10 times as much violence as boys their age, a Statistics Canada study released Tuesday says that rates of police-reported dating violence are highest for those in their 30s. Between 2004 and 2008, rates of reported violence rose 40 per cent for women and 47 per cent for men. Women were victims of dating violence 80 per cent of the time, with a majority of incidents occurring after the relationship ended.

Unfortunately, under-reporting may mean the actual rates are much higher.

I’m having a hard time caring what pro-choice “feminists” think:

Leaving aside the undefined and rather pretentious notion of authenticity, “pro-life feminism” makes no sense. Feminism is about equality, about a woman’s right to make her own choices in life, including whether to continue a pregnancy. Without that right, women lose control over their lives. Women who run on a platform that includes denying other women the right to choose how many children they will have or whether they have any are not feminists. They can call themselves whatever they want — pro-family, anti-tax, small government — but not feminists. Feminism means more than individual success in the workplace or in politics. Feminism is also about more than reproductive rights, but it most certainly includes that.

Janet Bagnall will feel good about the fact that I don’t call myself a feminist, no. That’s because the feminists I’ve met who strongly self-identified as such are some of the most bitter, ill-informed, out of touch, boring, whining, unhappy lot of old women I’ve ever met.

Just so we’re clear on why I’m not one.

Planned Parenthood of the Heartland has been having a difficult time lately. Following the introduction of telemedical abortion pill administration, the organization has been accused of patient neglect and an investigator has been assigned to the case.

Roughly two years ago, Iowa became the first state in the nation to carry out the telemedicine program, which uses “modern technology and telecommunications” to connect a patient from a rural area with a doctor at a remote location.

Planned Parenthood has telemedicine programs in 16 locations throughout the state, including Iowa City.

If a woman chooses a telemedical procedure, the medical staff provides her with an examination and an ultrasound.

Results are then sent to a doctor who meets with the patient via a closed-circuit video conference to discuss any concerns.

Once the doctor has determined the woman is medically eligible to take the abortion pill, a medication dispensing unit is unlocked and the patient has access to the pill, misoprostol or mifepristone.

The doctor observes the patient take the pill and provides her with additional instructions for follow-up care.

But Planned Parenthood is not a group that rests on its laurels. Concurrently, the organization is suing the state of Nebraska for law LB 594, a law which requires abortion providers to evaluate and inform patients of possible complications and risk factors based on information that has been published in accepted “peer reviewed journals” and to determine that the patient has not been coerced prior to the procedure. Obligations not easily fulfilled in a telemedical situation and that will slow down the process with a thorough review of patient history.

The possible penalties? $10,000 per uninformed patient and recovery sums for women who were the victims of coerced abortions that providers knowingly (or negligently) preformed.

The legislation, which was passed in April and is scheduled to go into effect on July 15, has been controversial for several months. According to Planned Parenthood, which services portions of Iowa, Illinois and Nebraska, the law in question seeks to “ensure that women are ‘informed’ before consenting to an abortion, [but] actually imposes requirements that are both impossible to meet and require physicians to flood their patients with false and misleading information.”

With money no object for legal fees, I’ll be watching this case as it climbs the judicial ranks.

…doesn’t mean you’re not alive.

When the study from the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists delivered the message that a fetus feels no pain prior to 24 weeks gestation, the conclusion became a line in the sand which will effect abortion limitations on both sides of the argument. In places where abortion is illegal prior to 24 weeks based on the possibility of fetal pain (like Nebraska where the procedure is barred after 20 weeks), activists are now pushing to move the limit forward based on this new research. In places where abortion is illegal only after 24 weeks, the study comes as a blow to pro-life advocates pushing for restrictions.

The situation illuminates the problem with gestational timelines as a basis for abortion law. When did pain become the determining factor for whether or not a person or animal is deserving of life (I blame Peter Singer personally)? After all, there are adults who don’t feel pain…

Physicians ultimately diagnosed Julie, now 28 and living in Manchester, with a rare form of congenital insensitivity to pain.

She has no sensation of touch, temperature, deep pressure or vibrations in her limbs and parts of her chest and back.

She does have sensation in her head and portions of her trunk. Julie’s motor nerves work correctly. She can move her arms and legs and turn her head at will.

The disorder is caused by a gene mutation that disrupts the development of sensory nerve fibers – those that carry sensations such as touch, pain, temperature to the brain.

With Lorna Dueck. You can watch online here. Yours truly is featured in one of the segments.

There is an assumption in sections of our culture that abortion is progressive, that history is moving inevitably towards greater acceptance of abortion globally. But legalized abortion is not in any way a new or a recent phenomenon. Abortion was legal in many ancient societies, including that of Rome. Not simply abortion, but infanticide. The killing of babies was common.

An extensive study of a mass burial at a Roman villa in the Thames Valley suggests that the 97 children all died at 40 weeks gestation, or very soon after birth.

The archaeologists believe that locals may have been killing and burying unwanted babies on the site in Hambleden, Buckinghamshire.

At this particular site, Sheppard Frere claims in his work Britannia that these children were not only victims of infanticide but were the unwanted female offspring of the slave-run establishment. The site is now believed to have been a brothel. There are interesting parallels between these gruesome practices and those of today, as Roman infanticide led to the deaths of many more girls than boys, boys being considered more valuable. So to consider abortion as progressive, when it is a legislative regression to a time when the value of life was bound up with a perceived worth based on gender, wealth and power, is incorrect.

Infants were not considered to be human beings until about the age of two and were not buried in cemeteries if they were younger than that.

…pregnancy doesn’t have to change your A game. In fact, it may just get you to the majors.

The stork can’t stop Ashley Crain.

Crain, 26, is 8 ½-months pregnant but that didn’t prevent her from teeing off Tuesday in a 120-woman field for the Toronto Star Women’s Amateur golf tournament at Weston Golf and Country Club, scene of Arnold Palmer’s 1955 Canadian Open victory.

The Toronto native, now living near Detroit, said her game has actually improved now that she’s expecting her first child, a girl.

She recently finished second in the Michigan Mid-Amateur tournament and has beaten her father, Paul Davis, a former Ontario amateur champion, for the first time.

Crain is playing so well, in fact, that her putting style, which she had to adjust, has actually been sharper, she said.