ProWomanProLife

You are here: Home / Archives for All Posts

So cool

by Leave a Comment

Angelina Jolie with Maddox 

There are rumous Angelina Jolie is pregnant again, perhaps with twins. I have no idea whether to believe this or not, but one thing I know for sure: I find the couple’s ambition to raise a large family awfully cool. Not that we all should aim for our very own soccer team, but hey, if you’ve got the resources, why not?

The abortion coverage continues

by Leave a Comment

The Post continues their series. Today we have Karen Selick. I like her. She’s so libertarian it hurts, but the position is sincerely-held and well-reasoned and very often, quite creative. Like today.  She has an interesting technological solution to abortion, and she writes that she can’t understand why no one has caught on to it. 
I can. Because that option acknowledges the humanity of the fetus and what it will become. Also, when you have abortion on demand, there is a decided lack of creativity and interest in looking into other options. And an inability to fund those options too. 
Can’t be so charitable towards Colby Cosh, that’s for sure, who writes this. I’d have much more to say–er, yes, a lot more–if I were not off now to go and see/meet? the man himself. I’ll be at this Morgentaler/Law conference in downtown Toronto today, and if they have a hot spot you’ll hear from me throughout the day. 

Yes!! Thank you!

by Leave a Comment

Lorne Gunter has a fine piece in today’s National Post about pro-life clubs on campus and how difficult life can be for them. The open-minded and tolerant, we are now discovering, are only open-minded and tolerant of opinions they already agree with. The same is happening all over the United States, as Evan Maloney has documented in his splendid Indoctrinate U (the film is playing in Ottawa Feb. 18).

But what really got my attention in Lorne’s piece is the advice to pro-lifers at the end of the column.

I have read scores of anti-abortion pamphlets of the kind given out by campus pro-lifers, and while I passionately defend their right to distribute them, I have a friendly word of advice: Get new tactics.

Your efforts to use graphic photos of mutilated fetuses and claims of “genocide” aren’t winning you any mainstream supporters.

INDEED! While I would encourage people to see those pictures at least once – it’s important to understand what it is we’re talking about – I really don’t like the way some activists display the pictures without warning. These are deeply offensive and disturbing images (as offensive and disturbing as the procedure itself), and as such should not be thrust in anybody’s face. If pro-lifers want to hold such exhibits, they should have the right to do so. But not right where people (including children) will just stumble upon them.

In the pocket of pro-choicers

by Leave a Comment

As the late Madam Justice Bertha Wilson wrote in the judgment, a woman has a right to continue or terminate a pregnancy, free of state interference

Hello incomplete reporting in this Globe article today. Justice Wilson was the only justice to say that. One of seven. It wasn’t the majority view, although, thanks to reports like this, many Canadians think it was the majority view. What we need to know about the Morgentaler case is this:

The court was not asked whether or not the Charter recognizes a constitutional right to abortion and therefore has not rendered an opinion on this specific question.

Still waiting for freedom

by Leave a Comment

Margaret Somerville in the Globe and Lorne Gunter in the Post today on a similar theme: We don’t have real freedom of expression on abortion. Therefore, we don’t have real choice.  Especially appreciate Margaret Somerville saying the risks of abortion are routinely downplayed–this is something I’ve heard from medical doctors as well.

In talking with people I find they don’t quite believe me when I say freedom of speech on abortion is severely curtailed. Two articles in one day goes at least a little way toward proving my point.

20 years of silence

by Leave a Comment

This has been a major beef of mine: silence on abortion. Have a read of Barbara Kay in today’s Post. Only I’m not sure pro-life zealots deserve the blame….

…In today’s second instalment, Barbara Kay argues that most Canadians believe abortion should be restricted in some cases –but have been silenced by pro-life zealots.

In my experience, the blame lies with pro-choice zealots. Then again, I grew up in very pro-choice social circles. Perhaps if you grew up ensconced in the pro-life side of things you might feel your freedom of speech was curtailed in a different way. What’s your experience? And if we need to lay blame for the silence–where should it go?

My opinion? No need to lay blame, just break the silence.

Celebrating abortion on Parliament Hill

by 2 Comments

There’s a gala event next week to celebrate the 20th anniversary of the “decriminalization of abortion in Canada.” Didn’t that happen in 1969? And “celebrate” is an odd choice of words. Women don’t celebrate abortion. We can only imagine what fun this gala will be. What do you wear to an abortion party? Go with black, I’d say. All black.   

The Honourable Senator Lucie Pépin is hosting the event, alongside the usual suspects: Abortion Rights Coalition of Canada (ARCC), Action Canada for Population and Development (ACPD), Canadians for Choice (CFC), Canadian Federation for Sexual Health (CFSH), Fédération du Québec pour le planning des naissances (FQPN) and the National Abortion Federation Canada (NAF). Henry Morgentaler will do a video presentation and Judy Rebick will speak. There’s entertainment too, provided by Lesley Hoyles and the Asinabika Women’s Drumming Circle. Who knows what Judy Rebick will say, but she told a crowd in Calgary in June 2005 this:

If you think about if for a minute these are people [pro-lifers] who really believe that abortion is murder. So if you believe that you would be a fanatic about it. Because you would think there is mass murder going on all the time in this country and what could be more important than that, to stop that. … so it is important to understand where they are coming from. …but the thing about that is that just like other elements of the right they have a very powerful story to tell which is that a fetus is a human being and they walk around with these big mangled fetus pictures…

Rebick must be very, very sure that the fetus is not a human being. Otherwise, that would be a bad mistake to make.    

Cross-posted to The Shotgun.

Try to keep up, will ya?

by Leave a Comment

Stories about young pro-lifers abound. There’s this one, and Paul Tuns also points to this in a post on his blog today.  

 

Pew Research Center polls dating back a decade show that 18- to 29-year-olds are consistently more likely than the general adult population to favor strict limits on abortion. A Pew survey over the summer found 22% of young adults support a total ban on abortion, compared with 15% of their parents’ generation.

__________________________________

Brigitte adds: I have to say I find the idea of kids “spiritually adopting” fetuses growing inside unknown women more than a little creepy. But yes, I’m glad teenagers are starting to oppose unrestricted abortion. I guess the Roe Effect was more than just a theory. Egad!

Meta