ProWomanProLife

  • The Story
  • The Women
  • Notable Columns
  • Contact Us
You are here: Home / Archives for Featured Posts

“No one has the right to a child”

March 20, 2017 by Andrea Mrozek Leave a Comment

This is refreshing. From feminists, no less. It’s an article about a conference that aims to shed light on the harms of surrogacy. 

The rights of the women who are carrying their baby, who are selling their eggs, aren’t considered at all,” Bindel said. “No one has the right to a child. And there are [already] plenty of babies and children who really do need care.”

I’m reminded of a poignant line from The Hunt for the Wilderpeople (a movie I cannot recommend highly enough) where the main character, a child in foster care, muses about how some people who want kids can’t have them, and others who don’t want kids, can and do have them. It’s one of life’s unfair basic truths. 

Jennifer Lahl planned the conference and is the creator of a documentary about surrogacy called Breeders. Worth watching if you get the chance.

Filed Under: All Posts, Featured Posts, Reproductive Technologies

There is a plan for our lives that is not of our making

March 12, 2017 by Andrea Mrozek 2 Comments

Recently I’ve encountered a few more folks saying they are Christian and pro-choice. They will tell you the Bible never mentions abortion so this issue certainly ought not be as important to Christians as it is to some. They will go on to tell you what is truly important to God (no less), based on the number of biblical references. It is its own kind of legalism, but I’ll return to that a bit later in this post. 

These folks have caused me to consider both what they are getting wrong and also–and more importantly–what I am getting wrong as a somewhat public pro-life advocate who is also a practicing Christian. This post is for Christians–though of course if you found us and aren’t one–you are a welcome reader. 

First then, what am I getting wrong?

I’m putting too much emphasis on abortion. Let me explain.

Abortion is an outcome of a host of other aspects of life gone (or going) wrong. In a purely practical way, abortion is the result of pregnancy when birth control fails, when relationships are not firmly established or not truly loving. It is the result of the egregious abuse of rape. It is a result when we don’t value mothers and we don’t value children as a society and therefore having a child stands as a barrier on a pathway to success. 

Going a bit deeper, and turning toward Christianity, abortion is the outcome when we do not rely on God. We do not trust He is good in all circumstances. He might be good in some circumstances, but not all, and not this one. This circumstance is unwanted and God clearly did not understand or see just how unwanted, therefore, this abortion (aka my abortion) is not wrong. 

I’ve always believed women know exactly why they are getting abortions. They are not confused about what is going on, particularly not today in an age of fetal medicine and in utero photography. We know why timing is of the essence in abortion–because the baby grows more self-evidently child-like every day. Women know that if they wait too long for abortion, they will have a baby. 

Where abortion is made into a valid option, it stems from the idea that I control my life and that certain circumstances have no purpose. Extending from this, certain people have no purpose.  [Tweet “Does my life only have the purpose that I give it?”] For non-Christians, depending on their worldview, this may be true. But for people who believe in God, it is not. Purpose is found in everything, regardless of whether it was precisely wanted or chosen.

The world finds purpose in degrees, money and power, not babies. I therefore am not likely to find any purpose in an unplanned pregnancy. By the world’s standards, purpose is commensurate to how I feel about my purpose and what I am told grants me purpose. 

This thinking is not Christian–and more broadly, it is not a faith worldview at all. Where we can justify abortion as a valid option, or see it as valid in some circumstances, we are essentially saying our own lives do not have purpose, value or meaning with a pregnancy that we did not plan. Yet the Christian worldview is that God gives us our identity and our meaning and, of course, that each and every human being is valuable, seen and planned, always. God is not scrambling; he does not think the pregnancy is unplanned. He is not saying: oh for crying out loud! I wanted her to get a PhD in biology! Someone, quick, do something! 

If I, as a pro-lifer, who happens also to be Christian spoke more of the value of each unique human being and if I were able to convince people, especially women, on this point, I  believe we would see fewer abortions. 

So my mistake is speaking about abortion which is a surface level manifestation of a much deeper problem, when I should be speaking of the infinite worth of each human life simply because it is. We are meeting eternal human souls in each and every human being–with the image of God in each and every human being. This is as true of born people as it is of unborn people. And if born people realized it, they would have more time for the unborn people. 

This is my mistake. Onwards to the mistake of pro-choice Christians, parsing the Bible to tell us that abortion isn’t in it. “Thou shalt not kill” is good enough for me on the abortion front. (If anyone wants to get into why I am not a pacifist I’m happy to engage that also, but for now, this would make an already too long post longer.) But for those Christians who see abortion as different or more complex, my question would be this: I’d like for you to show me the place in the Bible where God speaks of an unwanted soul. An unplanned person who therefore has no role to play. I’d argue there is no such person in the Bible. The biblical story is one where all play a role.  

Parsing the Bible to find proof texts is a bit of a teenager’s game. My teenager search, if you must know, was to see whether sex before marriage was actually wrong. It’s not there! It’s nowhere in the Bible! Hurray! Clearly, sex before marriage is OK. Parsing the Bible for proof texts means missing the point. Today, I see how sex before marriage is obviously prohibited for Christians, in a subtle way. It is interwoven into many texts, but specifically into Jesus’ extreme teaching on what marriage is–the one flesh union of a man and a woman. We can accept or reject this, but for Christians to claim sex without marriage is licit is a problem.  

Of course, the Bible has much to say on other issues. On poverty, the outsider, the marginalized. I’ve said it many times before but I’ll say it again: Abortion is not the only issue and I truly am grateful when others address other issues. I try to, as well, mostly by including those issues in my charitable portfolio.

But when it comes to our time, which is an important resource, alongside money, most people can only choose one cause to be truly active in. No one should denigrate those who have chosen as their main cause to give a voice to the voiceless in the preborn, just as I would never denigrate those who give a voice to the voiceless in fighting poverty amongst those already born. 

Long story short: I don’t think it’s possible to call yourself Christian and not think abortion is wrong. The Bible may not mention abortion, but it does have other prohibitions against killing and it doesn’t mention “forced pregnancy” or “unwanted people,” either. 

 

“The soul is healed by being with children.” –Dostoevsky

Filed Under: All Posts, Featured Posts

Almost six in ten Canadian women believe you can be feminist and pro-life

March 8, 2017 by Andrea Mrozek Leave a Comment

Feminism is far more inclusive than we are led to believe by the media and government. My workplace, Cardus commissioned a poll and asked: Can you be a feminist and pro-life? 57% of women said yes. 

What is the nature of feminism today? Who is a feminist? Is there room for a diversity of views? The good news is yes, there is. We asked: Can you be a feminist and pro-life? Only 18% of Canadians, less than two in ten, said this is not possible. A slim majority of Canadians believe you can be a feminist and pro-life at 52%. Fully 30% of Canadians were not sure. Of note is that more women than men say that you can be a feminist and be pro-life. Fully 57% of women, that’s almost six in ten Canadian women, believe this is possible. Contrasting with men, only 47% of men believe you can be a feminist and pro-life.

Filed Under: All Posts, Featured Posts

Being pro-life is pro-woman

March 8, 2017 by Andrea Mrozek Leave a Comment

Love it when other women say what I am thinking. Happy Women’s Day! 

What is concerning is how we came, as a society, to a place where disagreements about the nature of life and the rights of the unborn are seen as so divisive that it can lead groups of women to ostracize one another. The growing narrative in the media, entertainment world, and certainly in many academic circles, is that acceptance of abortion is standard (It isn’t.), that pro-lifers are only interested in unborn children and don’t work to support them past birth (Both false.), and that the pro-life movement does not care about women (We absolutely do).

We should be helping each other over the wall, not ostracizing those we disagree with.

Filed Under: All Posts, Featured Posts

Women’s health and the Pill

March 6, 2017 by Andrea Mrozek Leave a Comment

The Pill, meaning oral contraceptives, aka the birth control pill, is a bit of a sacred cow. It’s supposedly the greatest thing and a necessity if you want to reduce abortions. The facts don’t tell this story, namely, 80% of women are on the Pill at some point in their lives and we still manage to have a high abortion rate. 

Then, on the women’s health angle, more women are going public with how the Pill caused them pain, either mental or physical. That’s what makes this little bit of satire biting, courtesy of The Onion. 

Saying that she had been using birth control pills since she was a teenager, 30-year-old Claudia Spencer told reporters Friday that she was now thinking about switching to an entirely new set of debilitating side effects.

Some folks won’t be happy til the whole world is sterilized. We definitely don’t live in a culture that wants children when the Pill has all these side effects and women insist on taking it.

Filed Under: All Posts, Featured Posts

Living the revolution

March 3, 2017 by Andrea Mrozek Leave a Comment

She was just beginning her career as a physician and wasn’t ready to be a parent, she said in her lawsuit. “She wanted to meet a man, fall in love, get married, enjoy his life as wife with her husband and then, when she and her husband thought the time was ‘right,’ to have a baby.”

I have personally, to my own ears, not second hand, heard the above as a reason for getting an abortion. That child is long gone–the woman got it. (She wasn’t a physician, but otherwise the quote stands.)

 This is legit when a woman chooses it.

However, the quote above is actually this: 

He was just beginning his career as a physician and wasn’t ready to be a parent, he said in his lawsuit. “He wanted to meet a woman, fall in love, get married, enjoy his life as husband with his wife and then, when he and his wife thought the time was ‘right,’ to have a baby. The deceptions by DD deprived PP of the benefit of that choice.”

This is actually the story of a man who doesn’t want to be a dad and feels deceived into it. In other words, he would have aborted if he could. The courts are telling him he has to pay support and suck it up. 

Please make no mistake: I think the man is a cad and a fool. But only in the way we all are, these days, as most everyone believes pregnancy and sex are totally unrelated. The courts have to force him into payments and fatherhood because they can’t afford to set any precedent where parents are not responsible for their children–someone must pay. 

But this is a sad statement on our society when it comes to relationships. Viva la Revolucion. 

Living the revolution: Having our cake and eating it, too

Filed Under: All Posts, Ethics, Featured Posts, Feminism

Fertility awareness

March 1, 2017 by Andrea Mrozek Leave a Comment

Fertility awareness methods of birth control and family planning will continue to take off in spite of negative media reports because women like them. The oral contraceptive pill doesn’t work for all women–for some it has terrible side effects, for others it is unethical. It is empowering for women to know their bodies better and this is what fertility awareness achieves. It’s too bad that this new fertility awareness app got bad press but I don’t think it matters much. If my chosen method of fertility awareness (Creighton) had an app, I’d be thrilled. In fact, that’s the one and only shortcoming with the system right now–they make you use this old-fashioned thing called paper. 

Elina Berglund at a conference. Courtesy of LeWeb 2014 / Flickr

Filed Under: All Posts, Featured Posts

Rest in peace, Norma McCorvey

February 21, 2017 by Andrea Mrozek Leave a Comment

Norma McCorvey was Jane Roe, of Roe v. Wade. She became pro-life later in life and died on February 18 at age 69. 

Her conversion from pro-choice to pro-life activism was roughly simultaneous with her religious conversion and followed the same pattern: She did not plunge into those waters but waded, a step at a time. “I still believe in a woman’s right to an abortion,” she told an interviewer two days after her baptism, “but only in the first trimester.” On a local radio station only hours earlier, she said, “I’m pro-life. I think I have always been pro-life. I just didn’t know it.”

I chose this quote because rare is the person who has a complete and total conversion of heart in one “road to Damascus” moment. 

Photo credit: LifeSiteNews

Filed Under: All Posts, Featured Posts, Free Expression

Crying wolf for so many years

February 3, 2017 by Andrea Mrozek 1 Comment

I sign up deliberately for a lot of email lists where I disagree with the outlook and messaging. For example, I get many Guttmacher emails about “attacks on reproductive rights.” I’ve never believed the outraged headlines. I simply wanted to see what those folks are researching. 

I’d assume they would want to ramp up the rhetoric right now. But how? It’s been so over the top for so long. 

Pro-lifers, too, need to watch out on this file. If we are outraged all the time, we cannot alert people to true dangers. It’s getting harder and harder in a world of fake news. It takes facts and figures. Like yesterday, Pat Maloney from Run With Life let us know that where CIHI (Canadian Institute for Health Information) reported 23,746 abortions in Ontario for 2014, the number is actually 45,471 abortions, based on OHIP billings. 

This is news you can use and also, news you cannot dispute. This can be simply stated, no outrage required–make of it what you will. 

I know I have outrage fatigue. Here’s my commitment to not add unnecessary outrage to the world. 

This guy doesn’t like it when people cry wolf.

 

Filed Under: All Posts, Featured Posts

Gorsuch, the new US Supreme Court nominee

February 2, 2017 by Andrea Mrozek 1 Comment

This is a blog about why being anti-abortion is a pro-woman position. I am concerned with restoring a life-friendly approach in the culture, of which politics and the courts are a part. 

So let me say this: the Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch looks very good. And in tumultuous, troubled times, it is good when good people are seated at the highest court. Pro-life people can and should celebrate selection.  

Abortion isn’t the only issue of our day. There are so many to be concerned about. But I firmly believe that when we get the big things wrong, which we are today, by killing at the beginning and the end of life, then we get a multitude of other things wrong flowing from that. I also believe, and this should be the subject of a much longer post, that when we get life wrong, we get a host of other stupid, wrong laws in something of an attempt to cover up for other sins or alternatively, simply because when you get life wrong, other bad things happen. You can’t kill babies and/or elderly and disabled folks without ramifications somewhere. (Question: If we had a thriving and growing population, aka, if we actually had babies, would anyone really care where our immigrants came from?) I’ll try and expand this point later.

For now, let me say only this: I applaud Gorsuch’s nomination. He’s not a nominee Hillary Clinton would have chosen. 

Filed Under: All Posts, Featured Posts, Political

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • …
  • 44
  • Next Page »

Follow Us

Facebooktwitterrssby feather

Notable Columns

  • A pro-woman budget wouldn't tell me how to live my life
  • Bad medicine
  • Birth control pills have side effects
  • Canada Summer Jobs debacle–Can Trudeau call abortion a right?
  • Celebrate these Jubilee jailbirds
  • China has laws against sex selection. But not Canada. Why?
  • Family love is not a contract
  • Freedom to discuss the “choice”
  • Gender quotas don't help business or women
  • Ghomeshi case a wake-up call
  • Hidden cost of choice
  • Life at the heart of the matter
  • Life issues and the media
  • Need for rational abortion debate
  • New face of the abortion debate
  • People vs. kidneys
  • PET-P press release
  • Pro-life work is making me sick
  • Prolife doesn't mean anti-woman
  • Settle down or "lean in"
  • Sex education is all about values
  • Thank you, Camille Paglia
  • The new face of feminism
  • Today’s law worth discussing
  • When debate is shut down in Canada’s highest places
  • Whither feminism?

Categories

  • All Posts
  • Assisted Suicide/Euthanasia
  • Charitable
  • Ethics
  • Featured Media
  • Featured Posts
  • Feminism
  • Free Expression
  • International
  • Motherhood
  • Other
  • Political
  • Pregnancy Care Centres
  • Reproductive Technologies

All Posts

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Copyright © 2026 · News Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in