ProWomanProLife

  • The Story
  • The Women
  • Notable Columns
  • Contact Us
You are here: Home / All Posts / It’s time for something a little lighthearted

It’s time for something a little lighthearted

May 17, 2012 by Andrea Mrozek 8 Comments

Seriously! When ProWomanProLife was started, it wasn’t supposed to be all serious, all the time. Just Say No.

So here’s a Slate article I do agree with. I’d add you should just say no to any wedding gown that doesn’t allow you free movement to dance. Or walk, as is sometimes the case.

I personally also believe you should say no to the dress pictured above, which, based on less than extensive “research” was the only non-strapless wedding dress photo I could find on short notice. But that’s totally personal.

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmailby feather

Filed Under: All Posts

Comments

  1. JoAnna says

    May 17, 2012 at 1:49 pm

    What about Kate Middleton’s wedding dress? Not strapless and, I thought, absolutely gorgeous! http://www.styleite.com/media/kate-middleton-wedding-dress-display/

    Reply
  2. Jean says

    May 17, 2012 at 4:11 pm

    I was just going to mention Kate Middleton’s dress, too!

    Reply
  3. Megan says

    May 17, 2012 at 6:56 pm

    The dress pictured above is reminiscent of something Arwen Evenstar would wear. Passionate Tolkien fans would thus issue a vehement “yes” to it!

    Reply
  4. Julie Culshaw says

    May 17, 2012 at 7:16 pm

    Is there a reason that you needed to find a wedding dress on short notice? are you holding something back from us? or is this just a hypothetical question?

    Reply
  5. Andrea Mrozek says

    May 17, 2012 at 7:50 pm

    Sorry, Julie, a friend just sent this link, that’s all. (A friend, perhaps surprisingly, a male.) Not holding any events of significance back. I thought Yes! this resonates, because I’ve been to too many weddings where the bride could barely move. I hereby make a vow to never choose a wedding dress I can’t move around in, when the time comes.

    Megan, I actually did think of that. I have no problem with Tolkien. I would still say no to this dress. 🙂

    Reply
  6. Kevin Jackson says

    May 17, 2012 at 9:06 pm

    Do an image search for mormon wedding dresses. We have a thing about the shoulders being covered, so strapless is not an option.

    Reply
  7. Deborah Mullan says

    May 18, 2012 at 2:57 am

    Okay, BIG SIGH. This dress is imitating the Eowyn dress from The Two Towers. Come on, people, get your nerd on! I may or may not have a photo of myself wearing a dress that is nearly identical to this one. Ahem. (So what if one of my best friends is into costuming and likes dressing me up like a barbie doll?) 😉

    Anyway . . . it’s interesting what the Rentillo says about women wanting to feel like princesses and wanting to wow everyone, but if you think about it . . . princesses almost never go strapless (do they?). Not even in Disney movies.

    This is the one I got: http://ceallaighgirl.smugmug.com/Weddings/My-wedding/Wedding-Gowns/wedding-gown/291199392_crrga-X3.jpg . I just couldn’t do strapless. I tried on a few, but even though the bodice and down was beautiful, the top with bare shoulders AND arms was so boring. I’ve grown very tired of that look. It always reminds me of someone who has just gotten out of the shower and wrapped a white large white bath towel around herself.

    I agree with everybody about how beautiful Kate Middleton’s gown was. Very elegant.

    Oooh, and Kevin is right, the Mormons have come up with some very nice wedding gowns too. I’ve seen quite a few wedding photos from some of my Mormon friends whose weddings I couldn’t attend, and they all looked so nice. Really classy, I think.

    I just love wedding gowns, they’re so much fun!

    Reply
  8. Rachel says

    May 26, 2012 at 7:56 pm

    Kate Middleton’s dress was a disappointment. Just lace over a regular strapless gown. Sure it had sleeves, but it was not original enough to set off a new trend. Girls with heavy arms and shoulders look terrible in strapless dresses. And the popular shoulder tattoos clash with the aspirations to glamour. A dressmaker is the only solution.

    Reply

Leave a Reply to Julie Culshaw Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow Us

Facebooktwitterrssby feather

Notable Columns

  • A pro-woman budget wouldn't tell me how to live my life
  • Bad medicine
  • Birth control pills have side effects
  • Canada Summer Jobs debacle–Can Trudeau call abortion a right?
  • Celebrate these Jubilee jailbirds
  • China has laws against sex selection. But not Canada. Why?
  • Family love is not a contract
  • Freedom to discuss the “choice”
  • Gender quotas don't help business or women
  • Ghomeshi case a wake-up call
  • Hidden cost of choice
  • Life at the heart of the matter
  • Life issues and the media
  • Need for rational abortion debate
  • New face of the abortion debate
  • People vs. kidneys
  • PET-P press release
  • Pro-life work is making me sick
  • Prolife doesn't mean anti-woman
  • Settle down or "lean in"
  • Sex education is all about values
  • Thank you, Camille Paglia
  • The new face of feminism
  • Today’s law worth discussing
  • When debate is shut down in Canada’s highest places
  • Whither feminism?

Categories

  • All Posts
  • Assisted Suicide/Euthanasia
  • Charitable
  • Ethics
  • Featured Media
  • Featured Posts
  • Feminism
  • Free Expression
  • International
  • Motherhood
  • Other
  • Political
  • Pregnancy Care Centres
  • Reproductive Technologies

All Posts

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Copyright © 2026 · News Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in