ProWomanProLife

  • The Story
  • The Women
  • Notable Columns
  • Contact Us
You are here: Home / Archives for Andrea Mrozek

Respecting cultures

April 10, 2010 by Andrea Mrozek Leave a Comment

Back to maternal health: Dr. Leiva in today’s Ottawa Citizen:

Proper choice should include options for those methods that respect the social, cultural and religious values of the people in the developing world. Abortion is certainly not one of them.

The only other G8 story I’ve seen is about nuclear partnerships. If I were Prime Minister, I’d be tired of the whole maternal health saga by now too. That said, people on our side should tire him out more by sending friendly letters in support of his position not to include abortion in a maternal health mandate.

If we profess certain principles, now is the time to voice them privately to the Prime Minister’s office, and publicly, too.

Filed Under: All Posts

Make that two pro-lifers in jail

April 9, 2010 by Andrea Mrozek 6 Comments

For all the ridiculous frothing from feminists about how pro-lifers want to put women in jail, I’m now aware of two people in jail over the abortion issue, and they are both pro-life. There’s Linda Gibbons, put in jail because of a law which curtails our freedom of movement and speech, which she refused to obey as she peacefully engaged women on the sidewalks in front of abortion clinics.

And now there’s this New Brunswick man, David Little, who has this to say:

I’m prepared to die in jail, if necessary. I can no longer cope with the hypocrisy of praying for life … and paying for death.”

For the record, I’m just in the process of filing my taxes ahead of the deadline. But I do wonder about the place of orchestrated civil disobedience to evil. I’ve always thought I wouldn’t mind going to jail for the right reason. I’m not looking for it, I hasten to add, but I suppose jail has a time and place for the conscientious objectors of the world.

Filed Under: All Posts Tagged With: David Little, New Brunswick

Double standard or reality?

April 8, 2010 by Andrea Mrozek Leave a Comment

I like this ad, and I disagree with the criticism. We have way too many Hollywood starlets breaking up their families, for example, as if it works out hunky dory for everyone, when the reality is that wealth does smooth over some (not all) of the difficulties. Since personal trainers/make-up artists/nanny support etc. aren’t available to everyone, why shouldn’t we stare those facts in the face? Bristol Palin is in a unique situation. And it would be wrong not to acknowledge that.

That said, the next ad could address all the difficulties for a child, whether rich or poor, privileged or not, of growing up fatherless…

Filed Under: All Posts

From the UK

April 8, 2010 by Andrea Mrozek Leave a Comment

David Cameron, Conservative leader in the upcoming election, says he would support a reduction in the abortion limit from 24 to 22 or 20 weeks.

The usual suspects chime in. It’s so rare! And it’s only for those who are really disadvantaged! And our position is so precarious, we can’t suffer the smallest change.

Filed Under: All Posts

It doesn’t take an expert to know this

April 7, 2010 by Andrea Mrozek 1 Comment

I don’t think it takes a doctrinal expert to know that Catholics for Choice is a bit like Vegetarians for Meat. Come on. Really? You guys have been spending too much time with Nancy Pelosi. And on that note, I think it bears adding that this isn’t an active Canadian group, so far as I can tell.

Anyway, they are criticizing the maternal health mandate. I think it serves their purposes to do so, as part of the healthcare debate south of the border.

Filed Under: All Posts

The art of political compromise

April 7, 2010 by Andrea Mrozek 1 Comment

This is a reasonable proposal on the maternal health initiative, sure. It’s like this: If someone wants to kill their spouse, but decides they don’t actually want to do the dirty deed, then it is reasonable to hire someone else to do it. You see? Reasonable.

Filed Under: All Posts

“Womanliness first—afterwards what you will”

April 7, 2010 by Andrea Mrozek 2 Comments

If you are even just the smallest bit interested in this idea called “feminism”–read this article. It identifies “social feminism” as contrasted with “egalitarian feminism.” Most to all of the totally wacked out (inside voice, Andrea!) feminists in today’s public square, in academia and in politics are “egalitarian feminists.” This means they downplay or don’t believe in gender differences. Those feminists are trying to erase social feminists from history, says the author Christina Hoff Sommers. Or they villify them, because they stood up in favour of women’s rights whilst expecting that women still could conduct themselves as ladies. Hence the post title from one such social feminist, Frances Willard, who said that “with the vote, women could protect the homes they dearly loved. Indeed, Willard referred to the vote as ‘the home protection ballot.'” Interesting.

Whereas social feminists ask for an even playing field–equality of opportunity–while allowing women and men to turn toward their natural inclinations.

This is where my moment of eureka came in. Because egalitarian feminists don’t appreciate women’s natural inclinations (or men’s, but that we already knew). They want me (and the rest of you, too) to be an engineer “just like my mom.” Where a woman’s inclination is more inclined toward hearth and home, where women’s inclination takes them out of the business/political (public) world, then an egalitarian feminist can’t support that, because this would perpetuate the idea that the world is “run by men.”

Exposés on feminist theory that are reasonable (as opposed to shrill or bitter) are hard to come by. I recommend this (long-ish) article.

Filed Under: All Posts Tagged With: Christina Hoff Sommers

The $27,400 question

April 6, 2010 by Andrea Mrozek 4 Comments

Why did Status of Women Canada fund a pro-abortion group to do a disinformation campaign about crisis pregnancy centres?

Your tax dollars at work.

Filed Under: All Posts

Take a pill

April 6, 2010 by Andrea Mrozek Leave a Comment

This writer claims she is so very rational and logical and reasonable. Methinks she doth protest too much. 

She responds to someone who says she wants to broaden the discussion about The Pill, asking:

If you’re just asking questions and broadening the discussion, why is it so wrong to come to the conclusion that you want to be on the pill?  Why the self-flagellation, if this is about broadening the discussion?

The answer to that, I think, is pretty simple: A very high percentage of women are on The Pill and unaware of side effects of The Pill. They are unaware of any effective replacements for The Pill. I think statistics say 90 per cent of women will be on The Pill at some point in their lives. Therefore, any broadening of the discussion ain’t going to start with getting more women on it.

She’s allowed to rant and defend The Pill and call it natural and do whatever she wants… it’s her web site. I just somewhat resent her doing so as an ambassador of logic. She’s just as emotional as the rest of us.

Filed Under: All Posts

How do we show care?

April 5, 2010 by Andrea Mrozek Leave a Comment

This letter by a doctor in Oregon about euthanasia and assisted suicide is interesting. It made me think of those women I’ve heard of who wished they hadn’t had a choice because they felt like they were a burden, and were pressured into having abortions:

[The patient] acknowledged that multiple sclerosis was a major challenge and told me that if he got too much worse, he might want to “just end it.” “ It sounds like you are telling me this, because you might ultimately want assistance with your own suicide- if things got a worse,” I said.  He nodded affirmatively, and seemed relieved that I really understood what he was feeling. I told him that I could readily appreciate his fear and frustration and even his belief that assisted suicide might be a good option for him. At the same time, I told him that should he become sicker or weaker, I would work to give him the best care and support available. At the same time, I told him that no matter how debilitated he might become, that, at least to me, his life was, and would always be, inherently valuable. As such, I would not recommend, nor could I participate in his assisted-suicide.  In response, he simply said, “Thank you.”

Point being, I don’t think offering abortion offers too much hope or love to too many, in particular the very many who feel pressured into not keeping their babies in the first place, be it by boyfriends, spouses, parental expectations or self expectations.

Filed Under: All Posts

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 180
  • 181
  • 182
  • 183
  • 184
  • …
  • 279
  • Next Page »

Follow Us

Facebooktwitterrssby feather

Notable Columns

  • A pro-woman budget wouldn't tell me how to live my life
  • Bad medicine
  • Birth control pills have side effects
  • Canada Summer Jobs debacle–Can Trudeau call abortion a right?
  • Celebrate these Jubilee jailbirds
  • China has laws against sex selection. But not Canada. Why?
  • Family love is not a contract
  • Freedom to discuss the “choice”
  • Gender quotas don't help business or women
  • Ghomeshi case a wake-up call
  • Hidden cost of choice
  • Life at the heart of the matter
  • Life issues and the media
  • Need for rational abortion debate
  • New face of the abortion debate
  • People vs. kidneys
  • PET-P press release
  • Pro-life work is making me sick
  • Prolife doesn't mean anti-woman
  • Settle down or "lean in"
  • Sex education is all about values
  • Thank you, Camille Paglia
  • The new face of feminism
  • Today’s law worth discussing
  • When debate is shut down in Canada’s highest places
  • Whither feminism?

Categories

  • All Posts
  • Assisted Suicide/Euthanasia
  • Charitable
  • Ethics
  • Featured Media
  • Featured Posts
  • Feminism
  • Free Expression
  • International
  • Motherhood
  • Other
  • Political
  • Pregnancy Care Centres
  • Reproductive Technologies

All Posts

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Copyright © 2026 · News Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in