ProWomanProLife

  • The Story
  • The Women
  • Notable Columns
  • Contact Us
You are here: Home / Archives for Andrea Mrozek

The choices we don’t hear about

August 5, 2008 by Andrea Mrozek Leave a Comment

This is what I’m talking about: exercising your choices in favour of doing the right thing.

 

Women, empowered to choose life, in spite of obstacles, in spite of inconvenience, in spite of it all. In spite of knowing that your baby won’t make it, after carrying him for nine months. Is there not something heroic and honourable there? This is the substance of the choice that Somerville refers to in this article. And that’s the very same substance that ardent pro-abortion types won’t discuss, preferring instead to focus on how very different women’s “personal, individual realities” are.

 

I prefer to focus on what I can see, and what is true. Like the fact that disabled or not, this baby is still kicking in the womb.   

Filed Under: All Posts Tagged With: genetic termination, Margaret Somerville

Me? Need a protector? What?

August 1, 2008 by Andrea Mrozek 1 Comment

So last night I was sitting on my porch reading Save the Males. I was sitting on my porch because within four minutes of arriving home I was locked out. I had been in the house, mind you, with my very own set of keys, which remained inside, as I went back out… Never mind, it’s not a good story.

 

Back to Save the Males—I sat loudly guffawing as I read. People passed by, looking up as the neighbourhood was punctuated by my loud laughter. The author, Kathleen Parker is very funny. And funny people can say unpopular things.

 

Though for the life of me, I’ll never understand why what she is saying is “controversial.” Yes, I am out of touch—the zeitgeist of political correctism seems to be passing me by. Yes, yes, I’m learning when to self-censor. (Andrea enters chi-chi-la-la cocktail party. Old friend asks—so what are you up to these days? Ah, glad you asked: I am spearheading an effort to prove abortion is not a woman’s right! And you? Smile. Keep Smiling—“hold, hold”—as in the Gladiator ring.)

 

Here’s a quote that made me laugh:

 

At the same time that men have been ridiculed in the public square, the importance of fatherhood has been diminished, along with other traditionally male roles of father, protector, and provider, which are increasingly viewed as regressive manifestations of an outmoded patriarchy. The exemplar of the modern male is the hairless, metrosexualized man and decorator boys who turn heterosexual slobs into perfumed ponies. All of which is fine as long as we can dwell happily in the Kingdom of Starbucks, munching our biscotti and debating whether nature or nurture determines gender identity. But in the dangerous world in which we really live, it might be nice to have a few guys around who aren’t trying to juggle pedicures and highlights.

 

Now in my experience, women want men to be their protector and yes, provider. It is on pain of death that they will vocalize said desires. I have no problem doing so, (see previous anecdote from the cocktail party circuit) but I’ve been told “I’m different” perhaps even “special.” I’m also a woman who came dangerously close to calling 911—uttering the words “now is not my time to die”—on a family of raccoons. (My home is my castle. Correction: I rent. My apartment is their castle—and in any case I’m not allowed to have a shotgun. I wouldn’t know how to use it anyway, and that is where A Man would come in handy. It could hang over the doorway, as with Pa in Little House in the Big Woods—the books, please, not the TV series.)

 

What I relate to in the snippet of Save the Males above is the notion that we are living in dangerous times, and policy writers, assorted authors, lawyers and economists—well, when push comes to shove I hope they rise to the occasion, and I don’t mean by penning a strongly-worded letter. (“Dear Freedom Fighter, I understand that you may not have been given every opportunity in life, and that the decadent West has been needling you for a very long time. However, when the explosion occurred, many in my town experienced a severe drop in self esteem…”)

 

I will conclude by saying this Long Weekend, I plan on reading more of Save the Males—and one or two of them will even be around to fire up the BBQ. Of the criticisms this site has received one that bothers me more than others is that we are anti-male: Please, it just ain’t so. We are ProWomanProLife, so that you, my strong male friends, will not go extinct like the whales, and that when it comes to sex, love and babies you will not be told It’s None of Your Business. Most of you, I remain convinced, are aware that sex might involve a baby and that this is your domain too—your responsibility, your pride, your joy—to love and protect these kids and your women in the way that was always intended. 

 

_______________________________

Brigitte adds: A) I like men, too. Real ones, I mean. I find perfumed ponies sub-optimal – fer crying out loud I don’t need a guy with worse mood swings and emotional issues than I have, and if I needed someone to help me with my gown shopping, I’d call a real gay friend, not some wimpy metrosexual type. B) I enjoy the confidence my martial arts training has given me. I don’t need a protector, but hey, if hubby (who also has a second-degree black belt) feels like doing what needs doing should someone be so dumb as to try attacking us, I won’t mind. C) I also looooove not having to fire up the BBQ.

 

Filed Under: All Posts Tagged With: chauvinism, Kathleen Parker, Save the Males

America’s lost daughters

August 1, 2008 by Andrea Mrozek Leave a Comment

I’m not surprised when a barbaric practice begets other barbaric practices…

Steve Mosher of the Population Research Institute discusses sex selection abortion in the United States in the clip below. We know it’s happening in Canada–so why not the USA too?

[youtube:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZtfINUwalLA]

______________________________

Brigitte adds: My favourite part is where he challenges feminist organizations to join him in the fight to stop sex-selective abortion. “Where are the feminists when you need them?” Good question indeed.

Filed Under: All Posts Tagged With: america, sex selective abortion, Steve Mosher

What a cheery business they’re in

August 1, 2008 by Andrea Mrozek Leave a Comment

Pop the champagne–$4.3 billion dollars saved, by preventing babies from being born! 

I’m not used to this kind of “dollars and cents” analysis from the Guttmacher Institute, the research arm of Planned Parenthood. Viva The Guttmacher, for all the work they do to clean up this here human race–following on a long tradition of cleansing us from unwanted types…

Filed Under: All Posts Tagged With: Guttmacher Institute, Margaret Sanger

Relax-

July 31, 2008 by Andrea Mrozek Leave a Comment

Smoke a joint, do some yoga… I’m sure you can think of something.

The poll is so laughable, risible, ridiculous, idiotic–yet worth an entire post and many comments. I’m searching for a word, and I think it starts with “i”. Irony. That’s it.

PS. Do traditional hippies swear like sailors?

_________________________

Brigitte is no expert on hippies: However I am convinced that most people swear because they can’t be bothered to think of different words – and some people because they can’t think of better words. Which is a bit sad, but hey. So is the whole hippie thing (I thought even Tom Wolfe’s takedown of the Kesey bunch was unbearable). Anyway, what I don’t get is this: Where do people get the idea that being opposed to abortion is necessarily an attempt at controlling other people’s sexual lives?

__________________________

Tanya agrees with Brigitte: But I rather think it’s that he can’t be bothered to think of different words. How many times did he repeat the words ‘MASSIVE POLL,’ for Pete’s sake? Worst part is, with the exception of the word ‘hinky,’ repeating ‘MASSIVE POLL’ is as scintillating as the monologue gets.

Filed Under: All Posts Tagged With: Unrepentant old hippie

Who’s mixing politics and science again?

July 31, 2008 by Andrea Mrozek 1 Comment

The American Psychological Association (APA) has been reviewing their position on mental health after abortion for over a year. They are considering all the new research since 1990. There’s much for them to consider, all published in peer-reviewed journals.

Consistent Life has been writing letters to the APA to ask how it is that the APA can hold a clearly political stand, at the same time as they purport to act as unbiased arbiters of the research:

APA has held a position of abortion as being a civil right for women since 1969, and therefore has a clear political stand.

Meanwhile, pro-abortion psychologists bemoan those conniving pro-lifers who are, doggone it, getting published in peer-reviewed journals. Make’s ’em “seem credible”:

Since then, says Adler, anti-abortion advocates have become more world-wise. “They’re using scientific terminology,” she points out. They’re also gaining credibility by getting published in mainstream journals.

Oh the shame. Imagine that, research being reviewed and published–even when it suggests there are negative effects to having an abortion.

Let’s stop for a second–indicating there are negative repercussions, mental health or otherwise, is not a pro-life or a pro-choice thing to say. If it turns out a certain type of heart surgery is risky, no one declares the researcher to be against heart surgery. If a weatherman predicts rain, it doesn’t mean he’s against the sun. This is how crazy pro-abortion types get at the mere suggestion that their beloved “right” might not always be pain-free.

So they slam the research. Women who have abortions, they say, are not randomly selected. True. But neither are those who undergo heart surgery: There may be genetics, or health factors involved. We still study the thing. 

Slamming the research means one of two things: it’s either an admission that the peer review process is flawed  and I’d be open to that, having seen one study where fully fifty per cent of the study sample was lost and yet the authors still managed to declare abortion does not harm women–see Major et al, “Psychological Responses of Women After First-Trimester Abortion” for an example.

But more likely, it is a pro-abortion elite declaring their bias is AOK; a pro-life bias is not.

Before the APA undertook this, they ought to have dropped their anachronistic old-school statement, that abortion is a civil right. Abortion never was a right, not then, not now. And if they keep that sort of statement, it casts a pallour on their work regarding abortion and mental health.

Watch for the final APA report, which should come out this August.

Filed Under: All Posts Tagged With: American Psychological Association, APA, Brenda Major, Consistent Life, mental health after abortion, Nancy Adler, peer-review, post-abortion syndrome

Just doing what they were told

July 30, 2008 by Andrea Mrozek Leave a Comment

This little report talks about how kids today take the big step of having sex without a condom to show how committed they are. It’s like an engagement!  

 

Here we witness the power of lust to take two strangers having sex to the level of two strangers committed to the joys of enduring an STD together, til death do they part. Cuz

a ring is very temporary. You can sort of just take that ring off whereas if you don’t use condoms and get an STD then it is sort of a much less temporary result of your engagement than a tan line on your finger.

 Planned Parenthood must be quite distraught. Was it the curriculum? Were we boring? Did we not say you could have sex anytime, any place so long as it was safe? And there’s the rub: These kids are doing exactly what they were told. After all, before they move to condomless sex, they get tested. Now that’s romance.

Filed Under: All Posts Tagged With: Condom-free sex, National Public Radio, safe sex, sexually transmitted disease, STD

Communist abuses of Olympic proportions

July 30, 2008 by Andrea Mrozek Leave a Comment

The discussions I’ve heard here about the Beijing Olympics seem to centre on air quality. Meanwhile, half a million Chinese are in jail without charge or trial… Priorities, anyone?

__________________________

Brigitte adds: Though I am glad that China’s egregious neglect of the environment is finally being recognized for what it is, personally, I would like more attention paid to the country’s one-child policy and its effect not only on females (of the baby and grown-up variety), but also on families generally.

Filed Under: All Posts Tagged With: abuse, air quality, Beijing, International Olympics COmmittee, Olympics

Everyone is talking about how Malthus was wrong

July 29, 2008 by Andrea Mrozek Leave a Comment

Refuting false notions on “overpopulation” is going to require more and more posts. Though in actual fact “the birth dearth” is a greater problem, many still maintain out of date worries of too many people falling off the globe. (Apparently, they may also think the world is flat.) Some British sites address this issue here.

Tis true: “Human beings are the ultimate resource.”

Malthus. Not just wrong, but dead wrong. Correct your assumptions accordingly.

Filed Under: All Posts Tagged With: CentreRight, ConservativeHome, Malthus, Tim Montgomerie

Malthus was wrong

July 28, 2008 by Andrea Mrozek Leave a Comment

Russia is giving out cash prizes for people who have more kids and Germany, fertility rate of 1.4, is producing kinder-encouraging commercials. Encouraging a family-friendly atmosphere is one thing: I don’t think you can do this without encouraging marriage, which Europeans seem to have given up on, being so progressive and all.

Still, the ads are quite poignant. (in German, with subtitles, below.)

[youtube:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fTh92FnV_i4&eurl=http://catholicaudio.blogspot.com/search/label/Contraception]

Filed Under: All Posts Tagged With: birth dearth, Children, depopulation, germany, kinder

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 244
  • 245
  • 246
  • 247
  • 248
  • …
  • 279
  • Next Page »

Follow Us

Facebooktwitterrssby feather

Notable Columns

  • A pro-woman budget wouldn't tell me how to live my life
  • Bad medicine
  • Birth control pills have side effects
  • Canada Summer Jobs debacle–Can Trudeau call abortion a right?
  • Celebrate these Jubilee jailbirds
  • China has laws against sex selection. But not Canada. Why?
  • Family love is not a contract
  • Freedom to discuss the “choice”
  • Gender quotas don't help business or women
  • Ghomeshi case a wake-up call
  • Hidden cost of choice
  • Life at the heart of the matter
  • Life issues and the media
  • Need for rational abortion debate
  • New face of the abortion debate
  • People vs. kidneys
  • PET-P press release
  • Pro-life work is making me sick
  • Prolife doesn't mean anti-woman
  • Settle down or "lean in"
  • Sex education is all about values
  • Thank you, Camille Paglia
  • The new face of feminism
  • Today’s law worth discussing
  • When debate is shut down in Canada’s highest places
  • Whither feminism?

Categories

  • All Posts
  • Assisted Suicide/Euthanasia
  • Charitable
  • Ethics
  • Featured Media
  • Featured Posts
  • Feminism
  • Free Expression
  • International
  • Motherhood
  • Other
  • Political
  • Pregnancy Care Centres
  • Reproductive Technologies

All Posts

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Copyright © 2026 · News Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in