ProWomanProLife

  • The Story
  • The Women
  • Notable Columns
  • Contact Us
You are here: Home / Archives for Andrea Mrozek

About that Pill…

December 3, 2010 by Andrea Mrozek Leave a Comment

This is a very interesting article about the Pill. It describes how the Pill deceives women, in spite of being applauded as this great liberator. The author describes, rather factually, how the Pill denies women very concrete information about our cycles and how our bodies work. It deceives some women into thinking they have no physical problems with their cycle, when in fact the Pill merely masks symptoms, and any underlying physical problems remain. Finally, it gives women a false sense of confidence that their fertility will last forever. The good news is that many women are catching on to the deceit:

…[W]omen are half-consciously rebelling against the artificiality of the Pill’s regime. Removal from one’s true biological processes was more appealing in the Mad Men era, when machines were going to save the world and pills could fix everything, even the ennui of housewives. But for the wheatgrass-and-yoga generation, there’s something about taking a pill every day that’s insulting to one’s sense of self, as an accomplished, adult woman. “I feel like I’ve gotten a message over the years that the less I have to do with the nitty-gritty biological stuff of being a woman, the better, and that’s a weird message,” says Sophia, 35, who was on the Pill for fourteen years. “In my ninth-grade health class, I remember the teacher saying, ‘You can get pregnant any day of the month, so always use protection,’ and I kind of knew that wasn’t true, but because I was on the Pill, I never really cared about finding out the right answer. The Pill takes a certain knowledge away from you, and that knowledge is empowering.”

One weakness of the article is that it tries to say there are no physical side effects, which isn’t true, but then, this article is more about the cultural side of how the Pill affects women’s choices. Worth the (long) read, particularly when we have some public health nurses and doctors declaring the very best thing we can do is get every teenage girl on the Pill.

Filed Under: All Posts

Women who support Roxanne’s Law

November 30, 2010 by Andrea Mrozek 1 Comment

The vote on Rod Bruinooge’s bill banning coerced abortion will be on December 15, I believe. Here’s some of us who support it:
[youtube:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Yri-9bzbJg”>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Yri-9bzbJg]
________________________
Update: There is a bunch of video clips here, and ideas on how to support the bill, too.

Filed Under: All Posts

Warning! Seeing pictures could also lead to thinking

November 30, 2010 by Andrea Mrozek 2 Comments

From Carleton University. For more information, click here.
[youtube:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qYffo9dV8rI]

Filed Under: All Posts

Warning! Talking could lead to thinking

November 30, 2010 by Andrea Mrozek Leave a Comment

A nice letter to the editor from one Stephen Woodworth, the Member of Parliament for Kitchener Centre. It’s a reasonable letter asking for discussion about abortion, but let me assure you, those who favour our abortion anytime status quo are chiselling him into the “anti-choice” side of the ledger as I type:

I support efforts to encourage a calm and respectful discussion about abortion law reform in Canada, as Canadians have passionately differing views over whether our existing abortion law, which declares that a child is not a human being until fully born, should be reformed. Many Canadians have decided that this question is too unpleasant to think about, much less talk about. This is because people on both sides have made it unpleasant with heated rhetoric. Until we convince Canadians that it’s not a burden to deal with this issue, people will continue to recoil from what is really a healthy discussion. There is plenty of medical and scientific evidence that can help us to answer the question whether or not our law is correct to say that a child is not a human being before birth, and therefore not deserving of human rights. There are modern principles of human rights which can be brought to bear. Difficult truths can always be tempered with sensitivity.

The alternative is to perpetuate a chill on national dialogue that will serve to perpetuate the status quo. Who’s goal is that?

To put it bluntly, that’s the goal of every active pro-choice/pro-abortion group. (Isn’t it their favourite line to say this issue was long ago decided?)

Filed Under: All Posts

Sad days at abortion clinics

November 29, 2010 by Andrea Mrozek 7 Comments

I think this article probably sums up quite well what many women are feeling when they go for abortions.

Filed Under: All Posts

Not sure what Roxanne’s Law would say about this one

November 26, 2010 by Andrea Mrozek 6 Comments

Roxanne’s Law is Bill C-510, a bill to ban coerced abortion. It’s named for Roxanne, who was brutally beaten and left in a snowbank to freeze to death because she wouldn’t have an abortion. But what if she had managed to protect herself and killed her attacker? Looks like that’s what happened here:

She said that morning Godwin kicked her in the stomach, grabbed her and put her in a choke hold, threw a knife at her at the bottom of the stairs, attacked her and grabbed her by the hair, trying to pull her upstairs. She said he then kicked the door closed so she couldn’t leave.

“He was coming towards me. I was scared. He was attacking me. I’ve never seen him so angry, the look in his face,” she testified, noting she then picked up the knife from the floor. “I was at the bottom of the stairs. That’s when I looked at him, saw the knife in his hand. I stabbed him and he collapsed.”

Morin claims she was acting in self-defence.

The courts will decide this particular case. But it does raise the point that attempting to coerce abortion is not as rare as one might think.

Filed Under: All Posts

Free speech on campus: Depends what you want to say

November 25, 2010 by Andrea Mrozek 1 Comment

I almost missed this one. George Jonas on what you can and can’t say on campus. Naturally pro-life speech falls into the category of what you can’t say. My favourite part on why freedom of speech is curtailed:

Second, because the centre-left, in charge of both universities and the justice system, has a soft spot for the far-left from which free-speech deniers are launching their forays. Centrists and extremists of the left are kin under the skin. Left-centrists embrace illiberal institutions from “human rights” tribunals to affirmative discrimination, just like the far-left. While the centre-right is embarrassed by its far-right cousins and disowns them, the centre-left tries to find excuses for the black sheep of its own ideological family.

No matter how we got there, the end result is that we have police taking away pro-lifers in handcuffs.

Filed Under: All Posts

Yes, it was a hoax

November 24, 2010 by Andrea Mrozek 4 Comments

So the web site getting people to vote on whether a baby should be born or aborted really is a hoax. What a twisted thing to do.

I can really only think of one thing more twisted, and that’s the very many clinics we have actually aborting babies daily and calling it “women’s rights.”

______________________

Brigitte adds: If I understand correctly, they did it as a “pro-life” stunt. I would just like the record to show that this here pro-lifer very much disagrees with this kind of tactic. It’s not just twisted, it’s also quite stupid.

Filed Under: All Posts

New look, new life

November 23, 2010 by Andrea Mrozek Leave a Comment

I’m always grateful for sources of news beyond the mainstream. The more the merrier when it comes to media, I say, and somehow, by checking all the sources, we *may* get a true sense of what is going on.

In any event, check out LifeSite’s new look.

Filed Under: All Posts

Should Canada legalize euthanasia?

November 22, 2010 by Andrea Mrozek Leave a Comment

Vote no here, in this CBC online poll.

Filed Under: All Posts

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 158
  • 159
  • 160
  • 161
  • 162
  • …
  • 279
  • Next Page »

Follow Us

Facebooktwitterrssby feather

Notable Columns

  • A pro-woman budget wouldn't tell me how to live my life
  • Bad medicine
  • Birth control pills have side effects
  • Canada Summer Jobs debacle–Can Trudeau call abortion a right?
  • Celebrate these Jubilee jailbirds
  • China has laws against sex selection. But not Canada. Why?
  • Family love is not a contract
  • Freedom to discuss the “choice”
  • Gender quotas don't help business or women
  • Ghomeshi case a wake-up call
  • Hidden cost of choice
  • Life at the heart of the matter
  • Life issues and the media
  • Need for rational abortion debate
  • New face of the abortion debate
  • People vs. kidneys
  • PET-P press release
  • Pro-life work is making me sick
  • Prolife doesn't mean anti-woman
  • Settle down or "lean in"
  • Sex education is all about values
  • Thank you, Camille Paglia
  • The new face of feminism
  • Today’s law worth discussing
  • When debate is shut down in Canada’s highest places
  • Whither feminism?

Categories

  • All Posts
  • Assisted Suicide/Euthanasia
  • Charitable
  • Ethics
  • Featured Media
  • Featured Posts
  • Feminism
  • Free Expression
  • International
  • Motherhood
  • Other
  • Political
  • Pregnancy Care Centres
  • Reproductive Technologies

All Posts

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Copyright © 2026 · News Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in