ProWomanProLife

You are here: Home / Archives for All Posts

Read while waiting in line at the grocery store…

by 3 Comments

An entertainment rag (can’t remember which one) showing this picture of the Palin family pre-Trig (their youngest child). The caption – loosely quoted: “Rumours about Bristol being Trig’s birth mother were sparked after the publication of this picture showing Bristol apparently pregnant and Sarah Palin, well, not.”

Sounds like some entertainment columnists have seen too many photoshopped pictures of anorexic teenagers for the good of the rest of us. It’s called an abdomen and most of us have one, including my 12-year-old daughter. And my 11-year-old son. Scary.

Honours

by 1 Comment

An ad in today’s Hill Times asks for a review of how the Order of Canada Advisory Council works. Wouldn’t we all like to know.

As an aside, just found out two of my favourite historians are members: Michael Bliss and Michael Marrus. (Yes indeed, I have “favourite historians” and a growing collection of signed books. Imagine how lucky a girl is when she has signed copies of books by Martin Gilbert and Norman Davies. But I digress.)  

Here’s the problem–Bliss and Marrus deserve real honour. Michael Bliss never taught me, Professor Marrus did, and his was easily one of the best classes I ever took in five years at UofT. Thing is, he was a stickler for using the right words…

Could he possibly think that Morgentaler getting this award for “health care” is accurate? That supporting “a woman’s right to choose” for all its “truthiness,” makes any sense at all?

Nice

by 1 Comment

This is more the response I was expecting, even from women who disagree.

Journalists, including Canadians, who could barely contain their glee at the sight of the family-values queen turning out to have a pregnant unmarried daughter – as though the two are mutually exclusive – are infinitely more delicate about respecting the privacy of closeted gay politicians, for instance.

Being pro-life is not a seal on a perfect life–and that doesn’t make anyone a hypocrit. We all make plans for our lives. Or try to. And then other stuff happens. Planned Parenthood? That’s a myth.

__________________________________

Rebecca adds: Is the rule now that only politicians whose children are virgins until marriage are fit to hold office?  If anybody believes Bristol Palin is unusual in being sexually active at 17, they’re kidding themselves.  And contrary to the nitwits bleating about the futility of abstinence-based sex ed – we have no idea if she used birth control.  There is no perfect method of birth control.

 

I’m also very, very tired of people pointing to Mrs. Palin’s statement that she was “proud of Bristol for choosing to keep her baby” as proof that Palin wants abortion to be a choice at least for her own daughter.  It’s clear to me that she was referring to the decision between adoption and parenting.  (Although choosing to carry a baby to term and then adopt is no less praiseworthy.)

 

Finally, the great crisis of illegitimacy is about just that – illegitimacy.  Young women aged 17, 18 and 19 have been having babies for centuries.  The difference is that they were married when they gave birth, which the Palins have indicated is the plan for Bristol and the father of her baby.  I personally would not choose for my children to be married and parents quite that young (growing up and getting an education is hard enough work without such steep responsibilities) but the reality is it happens, and it’s not the end of the world, especially if the couple are committed to making it work and have the support of their families and community.

Let’s recap, just so we are all on the same page

by 2 Comments

Ken Epp designs and proposes Bill C-484. It’s uncontroversial among Canadians, who overwhelmingly approve of it in public opinion polls, until it passes second reading. At this point, pro-abortion extremists get worried. They begin a (at least somewhat successful) public campaign to discredit the bill and to create fears that really Bill C-484 intends to change our abortions laws, and give unborn people personhood status. In order to overturn Bill C-484, they put forward their own legislation, through Liberal MP Brent St. Denis.

The government’s proposed solution is actually already before the House of Commons. It was put forward last May by Liberal MP Brent St. Denis (Algoma—Manitoulin—Kapuskasing) in a private member’s bill that adds the targeting of a pregnant woman to a list of sentencing factors.

 Joyce Arthur supports that legislation, publicly: 

Now, Joyce Arthur, the head of the Abortion Rights Coalition of Canada and one of the top pro-abortion activists attacking the bill to protect pregnant women, is urging support for an alternative. In an editorial released on Monday, she said she prefers the new bill C-543 by Liberal MP Brent St Denis.

Rob Nicholson copies that legislation, much to the chagrin of many supporters of Bill C-484.

And then Joyce Arthur says this:

Joyce Arthur, of the Abortion Rights Coalition of Canada, believed that C484 would have led to making abortion illegal. However, she said that she too could see no reason for what Mr. Nicholson is proposing.

Keeping up with the inconsistencies is totally exhausting.

The next Margaret Thatcher?

by 1 Comment

Interesting piece by Barbara Amiel on whether Sarah Palin is like Margaret Thatcher. She highlights also all the delicious ironies the result of her nomination.

Had she been a man with similar political views, the left’s opposition would have been strong but less personally vicious: It would have focused neither on a daughter’s pregnancy, nor on the candidate’s inability to be a good parent if the job was landed. In its panic, the left was indicating that to be a female running for office these days is no hindrance but an advantage, and admitting that there is indeed a difference between mothers and fathers that cannot necessarily be resolved by having daddy doing the diaper run.

Just to be sporting, I’ll highlight the irony for some on the right but not for me personally. It is that people who normally would say mothers should, well, mother, are cheering her on in a job that will call her well away from her kids and home. Thankfully my line on women working and raising kids has always been that they should do what they feel comfortable doing, what they choose, working this out as a family, without government interference. (ie. no state funding for inequitable child care arrangements that not every woman can or will choose, like institutional day care.) 

Yesterday I had an email from another “downscale” educated woman who is thrilled with Sarah Palin–she pointed out she and her husband are working together on this one. How novel, we remarked, they are like a team.

Us downscale white people

by 3 Comments

David Frum writes:

But even based on what we know already, opinion about Palin’s life story will divide sharply. I wrote a column for The Week’s online edition suggesting how that opinion will divide. Briefly, the Palin choice will intensify GOP support among downscale white voters – while adding to the GOP’s difficulties among more educated white voters. 

I have a university degree what has got three letters in it, yet I find myself enthusiastically cheering for Gov. Palin. I am also white. I would be surprised to hear I am the only person in this situation. Is there such a thing as more educated downscale white voters? As Mark Steyn says, ease up on the snobbery, dude. “You’d be surprised how crowded it is down at the ‘downscale’ end.”

____________________________

Andrea adds: Downscale, upscale, whatever. I don’t think she’s courting the Lawrence Park vote.

___________________________

Rebecca adds: That’s tone deaf, even for Frum. He’s written some great books, my favourite of which is How We Got Here, which takes some of the focus on the culture wars off the 1960s and takes a closer look at the importance of the 1970s. His latest, Comeback, was just … off, in many ways. From his position on life (he wants pro-lifers to stop worrying about abortion and pay more attention to embryo-destructive research, as if it were a zero-sum contest between them, and as if a culture that won’t protect a third trimester baby could be bothered to protect a zygote) to his inattention to the role of culture in creating and perpetuating poverty, the book struck me as somehow misguided, as if he had carefully taken aim at his subject and then sneezed as he loosed his arrow.

At the time, I thought that this was a function of his preoccupation with foreign policy in recent years. He’s done some important work in that field, so fair enough if he’s not as au courant with social policy as he used to be. Now, though, it looks as if perhaps he just doesn’t get small-c conservative America.

_______________________

Andrea adds: “pay more attention to embryo-destructive research”–is that what he wants? Because that redeems his other off positions at least a little for me. I firmly believe that it won’t be too long before women won’t choose abortion for themselves. I’m less hopeful about those scientists who have control over many more lives, doing research on embryonic children. A mother knows what her unborn child is, intuitively. Does a scientist?

Obama and Palin are good for democracy

by 3 Comments

My guess is that voter turnout will be high for this election in the United States. Prior to Palin being chosen for VP, we had a very motivated group of Democrats who love Obama and will turn out in droves to vote for him. Now we have a group of very motivated Republicans who love Palin (sorry, this ain’t about McCain) and will turn out in droves to support that ticket. The choices are very different, very clear. The fact that both sides love their candidates will push more people to the polls.

This is good for democracy.

(What’s not good for democracy is a political spectrum that blends into one… I’ll let you guess what country I’m referring to.)

Cross-posted to The Shotgun.

She’s appallingly competent

by 1 Comment

…my sentiments on Sarah Palin exactly, courtesy of Barbara Kay:

The convention center exploded with joy, no doubt composed of 90% relief that – the Olympian comparison is apt – this talented but untested American gymnast had nailed a perfect 10 on the bars, the vault and the beam. She was calm and she radiated assurance. Her pointed barbs at Obama’s weaknesses were legitimate, and slyly, amiably expressed. Aggression without stridency.

Meta