ProWomanProLife

  • The Story
  • The Women
  • Notable Columns
  • Contact Us
You are here: Home / Archives for All Posts

Show me the data

April 26, 2008 by Andrea Mrozek Leave a Comment

This today, in the Post. And more needed than ever, is a discussion on freedom of conscience for the medical profession. The comment below highlights the issue well. So I decided to make it a post of its own. Dr. Philip Ney responds to the question “In practice, how hard is it to be pro-life in medical schools these days?”

What about, how hard is it to be a pro-life professor in a medical school? Very hard and becoming harder. Why? Because medical schools are abandoning evidence-based medicine and the pro-life physicians are letting them. Abortion and sexual preference are now designated moral issues, which because they are such, cannot be treated or scientifically investigated.
Thank the Lord I was academically successful (full professor 4 times, academic and clinical dept. head etc.) and was an outspoken pro-lifer. I also lost 3 positions. I know it has become much harder in medical schools.
What would I advise students and young profs? Don’t keep quiet and don’t compromise. If God wants you to get to the top, you will. Remember Joseph and stick to your principles. If you are asked if you would perform an abortion, answer “of course, when and if it is therapuetically indicated and when and if there is good evidence abortion is beneficial and relatively free of harmful effects. Until that time, I will adhere to primum non nocere.”

Don’t forget that the onus of proof rests on those who propose or perform any medical proceedure to show: it is indicated, beneficial, relatively free of harm, done in good conscience, performed only with fully informed consent and then only when all other avenues, less invasive, have been tried and found wanting. Keep insisting, “show me the data.” You can rest assured there is no satisfactory evidence abortion by choice is good treatment and plenty of evidence it is harmful. Ask me for references if you wish.

 

Filed Under: All Posts Tagged With: Archbishop of Toronto, Canadian medical association, Centre for Cultural Renewal, charter of rights and freedoms, Dr. Philip Ney, Dr. Rene Leiva, freedom of conscience, Iain Benson, Physicians for Life, The vocation of the Catholic physician, Thomas Collins

When is pollution not pollution?

April 26, 2008 by Rebecca Walberg 1 Comment

Intelligent discussion about the environment and pollution can be hard to find. I find the loudest voices on both sides of the “are we headed for ecological armageddon?” debate to be noisy and poorly read in basic statistics. There’s a lot to be said for maintaining the environment, especially in places like Canada, where open spaces are abundant and incredibly beautiful, but it takes a pretty hard heart to ask Indians and Chinese to do without heating and basic transportation for the sake of a theoretical reduction in world temperatures of .8 degrees several decades in the future.

Here is an issue of pollution and a threat to wildlife that’s worth more discussion than it’s getting.  The hormones in birth control pills (used also in the morning-after pill and some abortion inducing drugs, but because of sheer volume, it’s really about birth control pills) end up excreted into sewage, and make their way, despite all the treatments meant to neutralize human waste, into the water, well, everywhere.  This is devastating some fish populations.  If an oil refiner were releasing a substance into the water that had similar effects, we’d hear of nothing else, and be encouraged to boycott the producers, call for new oil taxes, lobby for new laws, and so on.

It’s no secret that the hard core environmental lobby are in favour of Zero Population Growth, where they don’t favour reducing the population.  The most common and reliable birth control method (in the developed world, anyway) pollutes the environment.  Will Greenpeace or similar have the intellectual honesty to call for a new look at birth control and our reliance on synthetic hormones to manipulate nature?  Many people have spoken out about hormonal manipulation of livestock and its effects both on humans and animals.  Why the silence here?

By all means, we (humanity) need some method of birth control that is safe and effective.  There is a lot about the pill that is politically attractive: it is, used properly, very effective, it is entirely within the purview of the woman involved, which meshes well with the reality of the hook-up culture, it’s marketed for all sorts of trivial things that make it even more appealing (want to have only four periods a year? want to clear up your acne? try the Pill!) and it makes drug companies a ton of money.  But there are increasing reasons to think that it’s not very safe.  If it’s not safe for wildlife to be exposed to these hormones indirectly, maybe we’ll finally start to look at how healthy it is for the women who ingest it daily.

Filed Under: All Posts Tagged With: birth control pill, pollution

Who’s that girl?

April 26, 2008 by Andrea Mrozek Leave a Comment

Why it’s Rebecca Walberg, ProWomanProLifer and media superstar. I wondered why Rebecca was not as active blogging, and found out it’s because she’s been writing for multiple Canadian dailies, here, here and here. Remember the little people, Rebecca, remember the little people… and by that I mean us, of course.

Filed Under: All Posts Tagged With: Rebecca Walberg

“Abortion Man”

April 25, 2008 by Andrea Mrozek Leave a Comment

I’d say this clip is definitely satire. I did not find it funny, but I don’t think it was meant to be. Join the debate. And yes, as Michelle Malkin warns–if you are easily offended, don’t watch.

______________________________

Brigitte adds: Yikes! I, too, think it’s meant to be satire. Awfully bad satire, mind. But they can’t be serious.

Right?

Filed Under: All Posts Tagged With: Abortion Man, Michelle Malkin

Reuters gets in on pro-life conspiracy

April 25, 2008 by Andrea Mrozek Leave a Comment

When Life Canada posted billboards that said this: “9 months. The length of time an abortion is allowed in Canada” the pro-abortion extremists went apoplectic. Ads were taken down in some cities, angry letters to editors were written claiming inaccuracy.

Now Reuters is in on that same crazy notion. The conspiracy widens.  

CANADA – Abortion has been legal, for any reason at any time up to delivery, since the Supreme Court struck down an anti-abortion law in 1988.

Filed Under: All Posts Tagged With: abortion in CAnada, international scene, Reuters

No grazie

April 25, 2008 by Andrea Mrozek Leave a Comment

The April Italian election featured abortion. The media analysis did not. Read about that here.

Looks like the public can stomach that divisive abortion debate. Is it the pundits who can’t?

Filed Under: All Posts Tagged With: abortion, Chuck Colson, Italian election, Italy, Silvio Berlusconi

Status of Women versus women

April 25, 2008 by Andrea Mrozek Leave a Comment

There’s women’s views, and then there’s the Status of Women view. If there’s one agency that needs to be defunded pronto it’d be them. I’d argue this by starting simple, with their name. “Status of Women.” Whose status? Which women? And we could move on from there.

(Cross-posted to The Shotgun)

Filed Under: All Posts Tagged With: Bill C-484, Ginette Petitpas, Status of Women, STatus of Women Canada, Violence against women

A special kind of biased reporting

April 24, 2008 by Andrea Mrozek Leave a Comment

Women don’t earn less than men, access to abortion is not about women’s rights, and Bill C-484 is not about abortion. Other than that, I suppose this article is just fine.

________________________

Véronique adds: There is an interesting dichotomy here. In 1928, the Supreme Court decided that women were not “qualified persons” and we look back with righteous indignation: How can “personhood” be so arbitrarily determined? Yet, in the same breath, we condemn Bill C-484 thus reaffirming our right to arbitrarily determine the non-personhood of the fetus. Pushing the irony even further, we can see that the same court — although differently made-up — declared women and fetuses non-persons.

I would like to know what is the moral basis of that argument. What makes arbitrary determinations of personhood and humanity wrong when it comes to women yet right when it comes to fetuses? Is it just that excluding fetuses is easier? More convenient? That’s not much of a moral argument.

Filed Under: All Posts Tagged With: alice west, equal opportunity, feminism, Jean Webber, Women's rights

Are food and water extraordinary?

April 24, 2008 by Andrea Mrozek Leave a Comment

Samuel Golubchuk was, as per this piece in the Canadian Medical Association Journal, “at the threshold of multiple organ failure in a Winnipeg intensive care unit.”

The piece describes how “fundamentalist religious beliefs” are propping up his life at the expense of giving the bed to a more needy patient.

An obligation to provide extraordinary care to dying patients, including patients who are minimally responsive, forces one to breach the everyday duty of care, which is to provide the best balance between probable harms and foreseeable benefits. That is why an approach that excludes the option to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining care is unworkable.

I’m not a doctor, but I never thought of food and water as “extraordinary measures.”

_______________________________

Tanya adds: I’m not sure I follow their point about “exploiting the dubious distinction between acts and omissions.”

 

If withholding food and water (in this case by removing a feeding tube) is simply an omission for which no one can be held liable, why is it called neglect when it is done to a child? It is inevitable that anyone who cannot feed himself will die if no one else feeds him. Seems like a pretty deliberate act to me. But I’m no doctor either.

 

Filed Under: All Posts Tagged With: futile care theory, God as doctor, Samuel Golubchuk, Winnipeg General Hospital

No decay of the human family here

April 24, 2008 by Tanya Zaleski Leave a Comment

Quebec is only meeting the increased demand for daycare by half. We have the coveted $7 a day daycare system in place here in this province, and, apparently, we can’t get enough of it. Essentially, we’ve created a monster that can never be quenched. Daycare here is the norm. It’s so normal, that everything else is abnormal. Attempting to illustrate:

Mary to Doris: I’m sending my son to the Big Daycare down the road. Where are you sending your daughter?

Doris to Mary: Oh, I’ll be staying home with her. (or My mother will be watching her 5 days a week.)

Mary to Doris (gasping for breath): What? Aren’t you terrified that she won’t be socialized?

Yes, that’s right. Many in Quebec believe that, if you don’t send your child to daycare, they will be that weird kid who sits in the corner and talks to himself. A fallacious stigma once reserved only for homeschooled children has now attached itself to those kids who spend their early formative years with (brace yourselves) family.

Filed Under: All Posts Tagged With: $7 a day, Daycare, Quebec, stay-at-home mom

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 443
  • 444
  • 445
  • 446
  • 447
  • …
  • 480
  • Next Page »

Follow Us

Facebooktwitterrssby feather

Notable Columns

  • A pro-woman budget wouldn't tell me how to live my life
  • Bad medicine
  • Birth control pills have side effects
  • Canada Summer Jobs debacle–Can Trudeau call abortion a right?
  • Celebrate these Jubilee jailbirds
  • China has laws against sex selection. But not Canada. Why?
  • Family love is not a contract
  • Freedom to discuss the “choice”
  • Gender quotas don't help business or women
  • Ghomeshi case a wake-up call
  • Hidden cost of choice
  • Life at the heart of the matter
  • Life issues and the media
  • Need for rational abortion debate
  • New face of the abortion debate
  • People vs. kidneys
  • PET-P press release
  • Pro-life work is making me sick
  • Prolife doesn't mean anti-woman
  • Settle down or "lean in"
  • Sex education is all about values
  • Thank you, Camille Paglia
  • The new face of feminism
  • Today’s law worth discussing
  • When debate is shut down in Canada’s highest places
  • Whither feminism?

Categories

  • All Posts
  • Assisted Suicide/Euthanasia
  • Charitable
  • Ethics
  • Featured Media
  • Featured Posts
  • Feminism
  • Free Expression
  • International
  • Motherhood
  • Other
  • Political
  • Pregnancy Care Centres
  • Reproductive Technologies

All Posts

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Copyright © 2026 · News Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in