ProWomanProLife

  • The Story
  • The Women
  • Notable Columns
  • Contact Us
You are here: Home / Archives for Andrea Mrozek

You call that sympathy?

March 7, 2008 by Andrea Mrozek Leave a Comment

Re.: Bill C-484, the unborn victims of crime bill, this column about sums up how much sympathy a pro-abortion advocate is prepared to have for women murdered when pregnant.

…the Supreme Court of Canada has ruled that a woman and her fetus are considered “one person.” That means there are no “unborn victims” of crime…

There you have it. There are no unborn victims. And “unborn victims” gets quotation marks, just to highlight how delusional a pregnant woman really is.

Don’t get me wrong, I like charades–have played it many times. But really, how long can women like Antonia Zerbisias keep this up? 

Filed Under: All Posts Tagged With: , Antonia Zerbisias, Bill C-484, Supreme Court, Toronto Star

Don’t debate this, either

March 6, 2008 by Andrea Mrozek Leave a Comment

stopfemalefoeticide.jpg

Don’t debate how India is paying cash to stop sex selection abortions.

Let those women (and the girls in the womb?) debate it–in their own minds.

Filed Under: All Posts Tagged With: foeticide, india, infanticide, sex selection abortion

I’m gestating on this one…give me a moment

March 6, 2008 by Andrea Mrozek Leave a Comment

What a letter.

I wasn’t sure how to title this post: “No need to debate abortion, but a definitive need to speak clear English” or how about “Pro-choice letter writer admits we are all just in various states of gestation…the quintessential pro-life point” or finally, “Yes! I’m in a state of gestation too.”

One small point on this letter to the editor: A debate can’t occur in isolation, in someone’s mind. That’s not a debate, that’s solitary contemplation. And women and men don’t contemplate abortion unless they are challenged to do so. Let me reiterate a point I’ve made before: An unexpected pregnancy is a very bad time to contemplate one’s views on abortion for the very first time.

Muriel Beauroy’s views are profoundly anti-woman, and I might add, contrary to making an informed choice.  

But keep up the good work, incoherent pro-choicers! Only makes my job a whole lot easier.

_____________________

Brigitte scratches her head in acute puzzlement:

To those who bemoan the conscience of many women on this matter, I would simply remind them that at any given moment vast numbers of women are in a state of gestation, visibly or not, to term or not. This is quite natural and private.

So we don’t need to bemoan the conscience (or, more aptly, lack thereof) of women because vast numbers of them are gestating even as we speak? Well, if that’s the pro-choice position, things are looking up indeed.

Filed Under: All Posts Tagged With: , ban debate, Muriel Beauroy, National Post, York University

Bill C-484 passes second reading

March 5, 2008 by Andrea Mrozek Leave a Comment

Bill C-484, the Unborn Victims of Crime bill, passes 147 to 133 in the House this evening.

(This is the bill that would make the murder of a pregnant woman count as two murders. If you want to read more about it, we’ve commented on it here, here, here and here. It now goes on to committee for discussion and debate. After that, it will return to the House for a final vote, and only then will finally go on to the Senate. That’s how I understand parliamentary procedure, anyway…)

Filed Under: All Posts Tagged With: Bill C-484, Ken Epp, unborn victims, Unborn victims of crime

It comes down to this

March 5, 2008 by Andrea Mrozek Leave a Comment

Elizabeth from Prince Edward Island wrote in to our site with this comment. We don’t normally publish comments as posts, but we are making an exception for this one, as Elizabeth doesn’t likely have much time before her friend goes and gets an abortion. If you want to offer your advice to her, we’ll forward it on, and publish the best comments at the end of the week, as usual.

I just found your website today and I really appreciate everything that you are doing.

I recently graduated from university and this story from York U aptly illustrates what pro-life students must face. Our views are considered on par with Holocaust deniers, white supremecists and wife beaters.

I live on Prince Edward Island, where you cannot get an abortion on demand. You must travel to New Brunswick and convince a panel of doctors why you should have one. Abortion Rights advocates habitually decry this situation as a violation of a women’s human rights. Myself, I am extremely proud of this situation and hope that it my province continues to stand out in North America as a place where babies are not killed.

Having to leave the Island to get an abortion requires women to put additional thought into their choice and really consider what they are doing.

A friend of my roomate (who lives in another country) is currently planning on an abortion. She originally was going to have the child, but is now worried it will jeopardize her relationship with the father.

I would like to try and convince this woman to change her mind and keep the child, as I doubt she would regret it, but my pro-choice roomate is against this and said she would be angry if I interfered. She does not believe this woman is mature enough or ready for parenthood.

What do people on this site think? Should I try and interfere? I just think that she would never regret giving birth, even if she ultimately chooses adoption. And can you imagine meeting the person whose life you saved?

Filed Under: All Posts

The squeaky wheels of student unions

March 5, 2008 by Andrea Mrozek Leave a Comment

Reasonable people have reasonable concerns about abortion-and, I might add, about pro-life arguments.

But you don’t find reasonable people at student unions, for the most part. And you certainly don’t find them at “women’s centres.” (That’s a place on campus the vast majority of women just don’t go.)

Yet these are the people who have power, as we’re seeing at York right now. They are the quickest to take offence, and their voices are the loudest. Precisely because they are completely unreasonable, they are heard.

The reasonable students are studying, playing sports and doing whatever it is students do.

These centres represent a fringe, barricade mentality: They are trapped in 60s ideology and unable to move with the times.

I’m glad Ms. Kelly Holloway of the York University Graduate Students Assocation banned the abortion debate: It highlights the strange alternate universe she inhabits for all to see. And I thank her for the national, front-page coverage on the abortion debate that never was.

Perhaps soon we can all move on a little from the notion that pro-lifers are the extreme ones here.

cross-posted to The Shotgun.

Filed Under: All Posts Tagged With: abortion debate, Feminist nonsense, Jojo Ruba, Kelly Holloway, York University Graduate Students Association

New comment page up

March 3, 2008 by Andrea Mrozek Leave a Comment

This week’s comments are posted, here.

Filed Under: All Posts

Abortion not up for debate at York U

March 3, 2008 by Andrea Mrozek 1 Comment

I already had more than an inkling that York University is a fourth rate institution–home to a sophistic stew of ideological propaganda. And I’m not just saying that because I went to UofT.

They prove my point here: Abortion can’t be debated “cuz it’s like debating the KKK or wife beating.”

Someone, anyone, take pity and get these kids at the York Federation of Students an education.

Filed Under: All Posts

Hell hath no fury like a fool scorned

March 1, 2008 by Andrea Mrozek Leave a Comment

lakeheadandlife.JPG

Recall how Lakehead had their club status denied.

Now the Lakehead Student Union has decided they want a pro-life/pro-choice debate. March 4 is the date. The Lakehead Life club invited Jojo Ruba to speak. 

If they were denied status before, they should now be preparing for a full excommunication.

You see, Jojo is responsible for the whole kerfuffle at Carleton University in 2006, when the Carleton student union banned the pro-life club there. That incident directly followed his debate with Planned Parenthood at Carleton University.

I happened to see him in action against the two (yes-two) ladies from Planned Parenthood. Apparently they brought each for moral support, which would have been very much needed because Jojo singlehandedly cleaned their clocks.

Pro-choice people to debate are hard to come by. I understand why they are wary. Flaky arguments that skirt the issue is what I heard when I attended the 2006 Carleton debate.

Jojo is respectful, kind, well-informed, logical and good. He’s excellent.

I hope Lakehead University holds this debate. I’m just saying-the pro-life club should prepare themselves for the fallout, because Mr. Ruba is really good. And the pro-choice side in the 2006 debate was really weak.

No one likes to be made the fool and apparently angry fools do foolish things.

Filed Under: All Posts Tagged With: ban, Jojo Ruba, Lakehead University, pro-life clubs

Justice denied

February 28, 2008 by Andrea Mrozek Leave a Comment

On Latimer, it’s justice denied.

You see, Canadian courts tend to be easy on killers of the disabled. Seven out of ten Canadians support Robert Latimer. Seventy percent of Canadians agree with assisted suicide for the chronically ill and disabled…

_________________

Brigitte adds: It still wouldn’t be right if 9.9 out of 10 supported it. And, ahem, Tracy Latimer did not die by suicide. It would help if we remembered not to confuse everything all the time.  

Filed Under: All Posts Tagged With: Human Life Matters, Robert Latimer

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 267
  • 268
  • 269
  • 270
  • 271
  • …
  • 279
  • Next Page »

Follow Us

Facebooktwitterrssby feather

Notable Columns

  • A pro-woman budget wouldn't tell me how to live my life
  • Bad medicine
  • Birth control pills have side effects
  • Canada Summer Jobs debacle–Can Trudeau call abortion a right?
  • Celebrate these Jubilee jailbirds
  • China has laws against sex selection. But not Canada. Why?
  • Family love is not a contract
  • Freedom to discuss the “choice”
  • Gender quotas don't help business or women
  • Ghomeshi case a wake-up call
  • Hidden cost of choice
  • Life at the heart of the matter
  • Life issues and the media
  • Need for rational abortion debate
  • New face of the abortion debate
  • People vs. kidneys
  • PET-P press release
  • Pro-life work is making me sick
  • Prolife doesn't mean anti-woman
  • Settle down or "lean in"
  • Sex education is all about values
  • Thank you, Camille Paglia
  • The new face of feminism
  • Today’s law worth discussing
  • When debate is shut down in Canada’s highest places
  • Whither feminism?

Categories

  • All Posts
  • Assisted Suicide/Euthanasia
  • Charitable
  • Ethics
  • Featured Media
  • Featured Posts
  • Feminism
  • Free Expression
  • International
  • Motherhood
  • Other
  • Political
  • Pregnancy Care Centres
  • Reproductive Technologies

All Posts

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Copyright © 2026 · News Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in